User talk:Soodvarun11

Welcome!

Hello, Soodvarun11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dr. J P Singh Oberoi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Hqb (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. J P Singh Oberoi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. J P Singh Oberoi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hqb (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soodvarun11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to wikipedia. I want to edit the article posted my me.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You don't appear to be blocked. An article of yours is tagged for speedy deletion, but you can still edit it (while its future is being decided, anyway). Peridon (talk) 18:41, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphan

Regarding your (misplaced) question at Template:Help me/doc: I assume you are referring to Gurpreet Sandhu. The {{Orphan}} tag there means what it says: no other articles link to that article. Please read the Wikipedia guidelines mentioned in that template. In short: try to find other articles that mention this person and link him in those articles. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but if there is no article which has Gurprret Sandhu's Name in it then how to remove this Tag ?

(Please read WP:TALK and WP:SIGN.) It shouldn't be removed. Maybe someone finds a way of introducing his name to an article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Gurpreet Sandhu ‎. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 12:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Kuru (talk) 11:21, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soodvarun11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You may be right. My Content need references which I am collecting. Give me some time. Wikipedia is huge so takes time to understand each aspect. Please unblock me. Thanks in advance.

Decline reason:

Please have only one unblock request open at a time. See below. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you can commit to only adding material that is strongly sourced, according to our guidelines on reliable sources and policy related to biographies of living persons, I'll unblock. Can you also indicate that you've read WP:COI? Kuru (talk) 13:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Awarded-Scholarship-for-1989-90.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Awarded-Scholarship-for-1989-90.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Awarded-Scholarship-for-1989-90.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soodvarun11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is very much unfair contributors. Why my editing is been blocked..I am a pharma student and I am looking Dr. Gurpreet Sandhu from 3-4 years. He has good name in pharma industry and contribution to society for his research work. I want people should know about him and his work...may be my content is not according to wikipedia..please give me time and suggestions to correct it.

Decline reason:

(1) If you are not willing to stick to the terms under which Kuru offered to unblock you, above, then unblocking you would not benefit Wikipedia. (2) After four years of persistently promoting one person (including posting such marketing-speak as "a highly-driven business leader with three decades of experience" and "a true international citizen with a global perspective") you asked to be unblocked because you "want people should know about him and his work". That sounds like an indication that you intend ti continue to edit for promotional purposes; if not, then you need to make your intention clearer. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I added a question for you above, right below your previous unblock request. Kuru (talk) 11:05, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Gurpreet Sandhu.jpg

You uploaded or restored , File:Gurpreet Sandhu.jpg, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]