User talk:SomeoneOK

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, SomeoneOK! I am Blablubbs and I am the volunteer who received your account request. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome! Blablubbs|talk 20:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where should I start if I want to contribute to Wikipedia? I had found a couple mistakes in one article but I would like to know where I could help! SomeoneOK (talk) 01:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there – sorry, I only saw this now. There are always things to do on Wikipedia – you may want to look at our task centre, which lists some great ways to contribute. Please let me know if I can help you with anything. (please use {{reply to|Blablubbs}} on reply). Blablubbs|talk 13:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to IP address blocking—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:41, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles

Article titles always use sentence case so you should not be moving them to not do so as you did with written language. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:06, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw, thank you! SomeoneOK (talk) 20:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please do not move move an article to a different title if it's simply a matter of capitalization as most of the time it's already correct to begin with. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, just noticed a majority of Articles seemed to follow all capitalization except for articles, so I thought it was wrong. SomeoneOK (talk) 20:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alphabet

The article Alphabet you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Alphabet for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TompaDompa -- TompaDompa (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Medicine

A WP:WikiProject is a group of editors who like to work together on articles. You're welcome to join us at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine. It's a good place to ask questions or to help each other out. If you'd like to, you're also welcome to join the informal, low-key contest about adding citations to articles: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Wikipedia/WikiProject_Medicine_reference_campaign_2023?enroll=qyoufwds (All you have to do is sign up at that link, and then edit normally. Everything else is automated.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tempting! I'll think about it. If there's stuff on immunology I may. SomeoneOK (talk) 19:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, please do! I saw your name in this list of recent edits because of your edits to Death, and I was particularly hoping that you would sign up. The contest covers anything that has {{WikiProject Medicine}} on the talk page (Category:All WikiProject Medicine articles lists them all – there are tens of thousands), and if you have a favorite article that is related to medicine but isn't tagged yet, then we can add it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will. I'm not entirely sure what article I want to improve if citations are what's needed if there's a category of articles that have citation tags and are related. I'll try and wipe as much as I can out. SomeoneOK (talk) 20:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to select any particular article. But since you asked, 😇 it happens that we have this whole huge list, and if you can tell me what general subject area interests you, I could probably get you a shorter list. For example, this short list has an end-of-life theme and this short list is about women's health. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it's no burden to you, if there's an immunology list and a mental health list, those are the fields I have a "decent" knowledge of. SomeoneOK (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Psychology-focused list is easy, although probably incomplete. Try this list for immunology (might be a little slow to load), or this list for molecular biology, if you're more interested in the MCB side of things. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This list might be better for mental health. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Death, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alphabet

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alphabet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Benji man -- Benji man (talk) 20:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alphabet

The article Alphabet you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Alphabet for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Benji man -- Benji man (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Death

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Death you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Death

The article Death you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Death for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:06, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]