Jump to content

User talk:Soman/Archives/2015/February

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 60th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide commemorations in Beirut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamra. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Minorities (Lebanon)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gatzeab.PNG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gatzeab.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

Proposed deletion of Lekh Nath Neupane

The article Lekh Nath Neupane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sher Bahadur Kunwor

The article Sher Bahadur Kunwor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 60th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide commemorations in Beirut

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

Nepalese politicians

Okay thanks-thing was I couldn't even get to the site at all, I tried to shorten it and it didn't work even. So I was unsure of what to say, but thanks again! (I've been the past few days adding stuff to anything on the shortest articles, something I've noticed is that the shortest articles pages are getting longer and longer articles if you count 771 bytes long lol, but a few years ago the 1000 shortest BLP's wouldn't even have anything over 600 bytes even!) Wgolf (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Beirut V - Minet El Hosn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 11:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

All India Forward Bloc

Hi Soman,
I don't know if this political party is a particular interest of yours, but I see that you created the Satyapriya Banerjee page. I thought you might take a look at the new Rajat Kumar Das BLP to see if it's worth keeping, prodding or even WP:CSD for non-notability. His main claim to fame seems to be that he is their "Central Web Administrator"! Regards, 220 of Borg 23:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

I'd delete the article. Being a district committee member of a political party is not enough to assert notability. --Soman (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Earth-grazing meteoroid of 13 October 1990

Thanks very much for the review. May I just ask which site seems to have restricted access? I accessed freely all the sites mentioned in the references. Jan Kameníček (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

I was unable to access the harvard.edu link when I did the review, thought it needed password. Now it works, however. Maybe I just had a connection problem. --Soman (talk) 15:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I see, thanks for explanation. Jan Kameníček (talk) 17:38, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beirut I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nahar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Deletion review

Hi Soman, as you may know this AFD was closed as delete all and I am also shocked to see the outcome. Should we take it to the deletion review? Because the closing admin in his talkpage notice states that if we aren't satisfied with his actions or want them changed, we can take it to deletion review. What do you think? Nomian (talk) 17:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it should go to deletion review. But I think a better first step would be to gather involved editors and develop a consensus on what should be considered criteria for notability of bilateral relations. If billions of dollars of trade annually isn't considered notable, what is? --Soman (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
That's a good idea but as far as I have seen, there had been many discussions regarding the criteria for notability of bilateral relations but so far no consensus has been reached to determine it. And I have a feeling that this time also we won't reach any consensus to determine the criteria for notability of bilateral relations. Nomian (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Soman, I have decided to take it to the deletion review. Nomian (talk) 16:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

DYK for Beirut I

Allen3 talk 12:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soman/Archives/2015/February&oldid=1125494436"