User talk:Somalipictures

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Somalipictures, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Sharma Boy to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 22:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Liance, I want to check the article, Draft:Sharma Boy if there is anything wrong or if it is worthy to be published when it is verified. Somalipictures (talk) 08:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liance Requesting to have my account unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Somalipictures (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your There is a misunderstanding, because I don't only work with a private account to ads here, but it is important to get information from places where it is important for the public to know, such as All articles have been Wikipedia:Articles for deletion based on the fact that this user Somalipictures (talk) been banned. Imam Shafi's Foundation, Hormoud University, Sharma Boy , Badri Hussein, Roti Abukey and etc., because my account is from Somalia, and mostly works on issues related to my country. So I strongly request that I appeal this case and be given another chance to be aware of what is wrong with my account and be given appropriate advice. We hope this mistake will not happen again. Somalipictures (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, multiple simultaneous unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 12:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfC notification: Draft:Sharma Boy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sharma Boy. Thanks! -- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Badri Hussein (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Grabup were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are just profile links, no in-depth coverage of the subject from multiple independent sources found.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Badri Hussein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GrabUp - Talk 16:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Somalipictures! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GrabUp - Talk 16:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rooti Abuukey (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I believe that this needs two things: stronger sourcing (most citations are from websites) and better copyediting for non-neutral language ("my grandfather's bread").

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rooti Abuukey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 13:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharma Boy (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see comments.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sharma Boy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdirahman Ali

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abdirahman Ali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ae245 (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdirahman Ali for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdirahman Ali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdirahman Ali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ae245 (talk) 17:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Somali Inside News

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Somali Inside News requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somali Inside News. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, as you must have realised would happen, because it has been used to evade blocks on one or more other accounts. The article edits you did with this sockpuppet account have also all been reverted, and the pages you created have been deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you know how to do so, using your original account. JBW (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW @Wikishovel, I want help. I don't know why I was banned, because you don't know anything about what I was accused of because I don't know, I think I only worked to improve the pages made in my country, and there is nothing else. I am now aware of what happened, and I can find a solution if possible, I hope this will not happen again. I am an official account managed by an individual, so please know, only the terms are new to me, so the mistake happened, and I apologize. Have a good day. Somalipictures (talk) 19:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want help

Somalipictures I don't know why I was banned, because you don't know anything about what I was accused of because I don't know, I think I only worked to improve the pages made in my country, and there is nothing else. I am now aware of what happened, and I can find a solution if possible, I hope this will not happen again. I am an official account managed by an individual, so please know, only the terms are new to me, so the mistake happened, and I apologize. Have a good day. Somalipictures (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the talk pages of your earlier accounts, it seems likely that you genuinely don't understand the reasons for the blocks, so I will try to clarify things for you. You were told at User talk:Abdiaziz Ali 1 and at User talk:Jonhman12 that you were blocked for advertising or promotion. Other accounts have been blocked either with no explanation on the corresponding talk pages or with the explanation that the account has been blocked because of abuse of multiple accounts. If you have an account which is blocked, it is not permissible to just try to avoid the block by using other accounts, and doing so leads not only to those other accounts being blocked to, but also to administrators being unlikely to unblock any of your accounts. If you are found to have been repeatedly evading blocks in this way, you may be banned from editing, which means that no administrator is allowed to unblock any of your accounts unless a community discussion authorises them to do so. Looking at the editing history of your various accounts, I can confirm that your main purpose in editing Wikipedia is evidently to promote, publicise, or advertise certain people, businesses, etc, which is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Since you have continued to do that after being blocked for doing so, with no indication that you have any interest in doing any other kind of editing, the blocks seem perfectly justified. However, if you are interested in doing other kinds of editing, on other subjects than those that you have been promoting, and if you believe that unblocking you would be beneficial to the encyclopaedia, you may request an unblock. You have been told how to do so on the talk pages of several of your earlier accounts, but I will remind you here. First read guide to appealing blocks and then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page, replacing "Your reason here" with appropriate text. However, I think it fair to warn you that the number of times you have just tried to evade the blocks by using other accounts, rather than posting an unblock request, very considerably reduces the likelihood of your being unblocked. JBW (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to have my account unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Somalipictures (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your There is a misunderstanding, because I don't only work with a private account to ads here, but it is important to get information from places where it is important for the public to know, such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion Imam Shafi's Foundation, Hormoud University, Sharma Boy , Baderi Hussein, Roti Abukey and etc., because my account is from Somalia, and mostly works on issues related to my country. So I strongly request that I appeal this case and be given another chance to be aware of what is wrong with my account and be given appropriate advice. We hope this mistake will not happen again. Somalipictures (talk) 03:46, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

None of this is relevant to your abuse of multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Somalipictures,

If you want to know why you were blocked, read the messages left for you on your User talk page. You keep creating new accounts to avoid a block on your original account. As long as you keep doing this, your edits will be reverted and your page creations will be deleted. Go back to your original account and appeal your block from there. You have to promise to stop socking with new accounts. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Liz,

Can you please help me appeal her account ban. I promise to stop stocking new accounts. Somalipictures (talk) 06:50, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Several people have given you advice on how to get unblocked and yet you do not seem to have taken any of it to heart. Nonetheless I will try again. You have evaded your block several times, so the first thing you should do is to stop editing anything but your own user talk page, no exceptions, for at least six months. This lays the groundwork for a standard offer. Once the six months has elapsed read WP:GAB, after reading it the first time read it again. Reread the advice given to you by JBW above on this page, and that by others at User talk:Abdiaziz Ali 1 and at User talk:Jonhman12. Log in to User:Abdiaziizho if you still have its credentials, if not go to the oldest account you have credential for. Write a very careful request that shows you understand what you did wrong, as just one example block-evasion, give a credible assurance that you will not repeat those same errors, and explain in detail what you want to edit about and why. If you choose to simply continue evading then all the pages you create will just end up repeatedly deleted, your call. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:39B9:A943:564A:3BA (talk) 23:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]