User talk:Sokuri

railroad square

please review the section of the santa rosa article entitled 'railroad square'. there you'll see brief mention of the hitchcock movie that was filmed there. that's an encyclopedic reference of a highly notable film. a separate section for a recent popular (but not particularly critically acclaimed film)is inappropriate. Anastrophe (talk) 22:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adam (cat)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adam (cat), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Adam (cat). -- MisterHand (Talk to the Hand|Contribs) 14:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Adam (cat)

I have nominated Adam (cat), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam (cat). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jfire (talk) 06:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on the AFD for Adam (cat)

Please do not make personal attacks, such as what you did on the AFD. It is uncivil and does not prove your point about the notability of Adam. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Adam (cat)

A tag has been placed on Adam (cat), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Adam (cat), you will be blocked from editing. Jfire (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you on crack? Sokuri (talk) 04:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

If you want to nominate for deletion go through the proper procedure. Do not make offensive comments. (You are already on a final warning for this.) Harry was a white dog with black spots (talk) 18:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McCann article

There is no chance of that article being deleted as a speedy., if you feel the article should be deleted, take it to AFD - however, there is no chance of it being deleted as this is a notable subject. --Fredrick day (talk) 19:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that, but it has already survived two AfDs, and hasn't got any less notable since. Harry was a white dog with black spots (talk) 19:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, if you wish to raise concerns over the article, take it to AFD. I'm the third editor to tell you to this now. Continuing to edit like this will end in your account being blocked. By me. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sokuri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm trying to show you guys that Adam is notable. I don't deserve my first block being forever. I'm trying to prove you guys wrong- and you guys are- but you won't listen, and start trolling.

Decline reason:

Who is the one trolling here, here, here, and here? Your incivility and refusal to collaborate within established Wikipedia policies and guidelines justify this block. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.