User talk:Sohoforgotpassword

I forgot my password to Soho527 so I changed my username to this one.

Sohoforgotpassword (talk) 05:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fashion Affair Magazine

The article Fashion Affair Magazine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable magazine.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Finngall ^talk 06:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks. Can other editors help add to the article too? I will do some more when I can.

Sohoforgotpassword (talk) 11:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goddessy Organics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Goddessy Organics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Banner talk 14:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:This is the logo for Goddessy Organics.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This is the logo for Goddessy Organics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Goddessy Organics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Goddessy Organics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tutelary (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goddessy Organics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goddessy Organics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goddessy Organics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 23:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sohoforgotpassword. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 17:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Goddessy Organics

Thanks for your message on my talk page. I'll have a closer look at the article when I can, but it might not be for a day or two. Deletion discussions normally last for a week, unless there is an overwhelming consensus to delete or keep the article, so there should be no danger of the article being deleted within the next few days. Meanwhile, take a moment to look at this information about the kind of sources that are required. The first of the sources in the article at present is unfortunately not a valid reference (the My Nature Mart one, a website selling the product), and I also notice one reference that is a press release (online PR web). But as I say I haven't really looked at the article, I just wanted to give you a heads-up. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 10:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Should I remove that link or let someone else do it? I did not notice that detail but will take a look later when I can. Since this seems like a process and more difficult than I thought, I will let you and others edit the article as you see fit. Sohoforgotpassword (talk) 12:56, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. I will remove that link now before I head out. Sohoforgotpassword (talk) 13:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fashion Affair Magazine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fashion Affair Magazine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashion Affair Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Goddessy Organics. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 11:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fashion Affair Magazine.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fashion Affair Magazine.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:This is the logo for Goddessy Organics.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This is the logo for Goddessy Organics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]