Jump to content

User talk:Social Earnings Ratio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have received a deletion request for 2 images for which I have the full IP authority for. Please see below:

From: Olinga Ta'eed [1] Sent: 08 December 2015 13:16 To: FutureVision2015@aol.com Subject: IP on Wiki Entry

I wish to confirm that you have our permission to use all the diagrams available to use on the following site:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Social_Earnings_Ratio

In particular the disputed diagrams Harvest.PNG which comes from our brochure (https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0ZjMfC4YqmvckUweVRIdEtSNkE&usp=sharing) and front cover of our CCEG magazine (http://issuu.com/seratio/docs/social_value_and_intangibles_review_929adaa177aea2) are, like the rest, approved for use on the wiki page under Creative Commons License. Indeed, the whole of Social Earnings Ratio is already registered under Creative Commons 4.0 as stated on your wiki and available here: http://find.jorum.ac.uk/resources/18904 and also http://www.cceg.org.uk/#!research/cmp.

Yours faithfully

Professor Olinga Ta’eed

Director Centre for Citizenship, Enterprise & Governance

www.cceg.org.uk www.seratio.com

Mobile: +44 (0) 7798 602987

Bureau 112 | UN Innovation | Green Street | Northampton NN1 1SY UK | tel: +44 1604 550100 | e-mail olinga.taeed@cceg.org.uk

AfC notification: Draft:Social Earnings Ratio has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Social Earnings Ratio. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am an ex MBA student from the University of Northampton (where Social Earnings Ratio originated from) who did this project voluntarily as an exercise since graduating. I am one of the 30,000 members of Centre for Citizenship, Enterprise and Governance which operates like Wiki - we are volunteers trying to contribute our time to explain the concept of Social Earnings Ratio.

You also said the name "Social Earnings Ratio" may violate Wiki rules but did not explain why? I notice these are similar and they have been accepted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price%E2%80%93earnings_ratio

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_return_on_investment

The UK Intellectual Property Office (government) has accepted the term as unique (referenced in the article) so it is not a generic comment

Thanks

November 2015

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Social Earnings Ratio", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Social Earnings Ratio. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Earnings Ratio (December 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Social Earnings Ratio, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:13, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless

[edit]

Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Earnings Ratio (December 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Social Earnings Ratio, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:32, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Social Earnings Ratio

[edit]

Hello, Social Earnings Ratio. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Social Earnings Ratio".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin Let's talk! 10:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]