User talk:Soccerguy1039/Archive1

Warnings

Nov 2006

Please stop adding unsourced statements while removing legitimate information from articles as you did to Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy XIII. It is considered vandalism and may result in a permanent block from editting Wikipedia. Axem Titanium 04:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Szvest ^{Wiki me up ®} 09:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerguy. Which site are you refering to? Which site have you been citing? All i read is this:

Final Fantasy Insider has stated that Final Fantasy XIII's completion stands at 13%, while despite what the Final Fantasy Versus XIII page may say, Final Fantasy Versus XIII's completion stands at 1.3%..

It is the opposite. I placed the reference to what User:Axem Titanium had edited. The reference clearly says that it could span a decade; just the opposite of what you claim. -- Szvest ····> ^{Wiki Me Up ®} 12:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see which site you are refering to. ffinsider.net is a forum/fan site, etc... It is not notable by wikipedia standards. Please refer to WP:Verifiability for more details. Szvest ····> ^{Wiki Me Up ®} 12:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 2006

Stop adding innacurate information to the Final Fantasy XIII page. As discussed on the Talk page, the weapon is NOT a gunblade. If you disagree then it can be discussed on the talk page. If you continue to change it to Gunblade despite our objections, your edits will be viewed as vandalism and you will be banned. Simondrake 23:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't change it to gunblade again.

If you took the time to look at the talk page you'd see the conclusion was not to refer to it as a gunblade until it is named by Square-Enix.

If you continue to change it to gunblade without explanation it will be viewed as vandalism and you will be banned. -- Simondrake 00:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is your final warning. There is no evidence outside your imagination to suggest your edits are accurate therefore you are vandalising repeatedly despite warnings. If you continue to vandalise and make personal attacks you will be bannedSimondrake 03:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT delete your talk page. It is not yours to delete. Furthermore, deleting others' comments is considered vandalism. — Chris53516 ^(Talk) 20:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

This edit is not acceptable here- please be civil. Friday (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Be sure not to revert excessively at Final Fantasy XIII. Friday (talk) 00:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours for changing another editor's comments. Normally, I'd just warn you, but you've have and removed a few warnings already. If you will continue editing, please read WP:CIVIL. Friday (talk) 19:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat Violation

You were blocked for 24 hours for a variety of offenses including deleting your talk page which listed all of your other offenses. The reason cited was that you were editing another user's comments on a talk page. Since you were unblocked you have edited that same user's comments on the same talk page four times. Not only is this vandalism but it is also abusive. Do not do this again or you will be blocked again.131.227.231.180 01:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blockings

I've already read all the past posts on my blockings and warning and such, and since they're all in the past I don't think that it's really very important that they stay on the page.--Soccerguy1039

The page isn't just for your own benefit. If--hypothetically--someone were to feel that you did something inappropriate on some Wikipedia page, they might say, "I wonder if he's done that kind of thing before?" And they'd come over to your talk page and see whether you'd been given warnings. So that's why your talk page is supposed to stick around. You can create an archive page, and move old warnings there, because that way they're still visible to people who visit your talk page (if they click through the link). But you're not supposed to just go and blank out the warnings. -- Narsil 08:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do I archive something?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccerguy1039 (talk • contribs)

Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page—ウルタプ 06:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned template

Is there any reason you insist on removing the "unsigned" template I put on your post at Talk:Final Fantasy XIII? It's important to know who says what in a conversation and it's just more convenient for everyone.—ウルタプ 06:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]