User talk:Soccerguy1039

Happy holidays !

You may want to consider endorsing this petition: User_talk:Friday#Petition_to_recall_User:Friday_from_the_position_of_admin. StuRat 12:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why would anybody want for you to remain an administrator? All you do is annoy people, and I can't sign it anyway since you blocked me. Not too smart are you?--Soccerguy1039

I agree, and the way to get rid of him is to sign the petition (after your block ends). To clarify, he remains an Admin forever unless he is forced to run for re-election and defeated, which is what this petition tries to do. StuRat 13:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my username shown in red and yours is shown in blue StuRat, and why does it only let me post half the stuff I type?--Soccerguy1039

Hey is there a petition thing like that for Canadian-Bacon? Because power-hungry egotists shouldn't be allowed to be administrators.--Soccerguy1039

If you're reading this AuburnPilot, when you posted that comment on the petition page about other people using my account you read something wrong. I am the only person that uses this name, but other people use the computer that I'm on most of the time, so I was definitely the one that signed that petition.--Soccerguy1039

Actually, I did a little research on Chemistry and now I'm happy that Friday wasn't forced to retry for the position of administrator.--User:Soccerguy1039

Archive2

Wow, I'm trying to archive the crap these idiots have been posting on my page but it won't let me archive it into my new archive.--Soccerguy1039

Well nobody better try and repost this crap onto my page since I'm trying to archive it and I will once I'm unblocked.--Soccerguy1039

Retarded Blocking

Haha that Friday guy that blocked me was so retarded that instead of blocking my name he blocked the IP address that I was using at the time. How stupid is this guy? I mean seriously, it'd make more sense to block my name since I don't have any other names rather than my IP address since I use multiple computers.--Soccerguy1039

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Canadian-Bacon (UTC)

Wow that was lame, I never made any personal attacks. It's really stupid of you to make insinuating comments about false comments. I don't know where power-hungry egotists like you get off.--Soccerguy1039

Calling editors stupid and retarded both here, as well as Talk:Final Fantasy XIII definately qualifies as personal attacks. Canadian-Bacon (UTC)

Calling idiots stupid and retarded doesn't qualify as a personal attack because it's true, and the only way you wouldn't know this is because you're stupid and retarded, but hey here's a compliment Canadian, at least you're not as big of a dumbass as that AuburnPilot queer.--Soccerguy1039

That comment in itself is a further personal attack, and is likely to get your account banned from editing again. Haven`t you learned your lesson yet? Stop acting the fool. Plebmonk 06:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What? Hehe well I don't think I'll be much of a problem again cause Mike's really getting pissed off at me for getting him blocked so much for just letting me use his computer, not to attack anybody but administrators are lame and block computers instead of users so people like Mike are constantly getting blocked because I use their computers.--Soccerguy1039

Learn some grammar and then retype that please. Plebmonk 04:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'm going to let you use my computer anymore Tyler, I'm tired of always being blocked.--67.174.128.249

There's nothing wrong with the grammar used in that Plebmonk.--Soccerguy1039

Uh Tyler, I was just wondering, if the reason that you keep getting blocked is because you remove that unsigned template, then why don't you just sign it? That way you wouldn't get blocked for it.--67.174.128.249

Um, I never really thought about it, but I guess I could do that.--Soccerguy1039

Re: "Sockpuppet"

…No.—ウルタプ 21:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't always check the history.
That was some bad knowing what you said.—ウルタプ 00:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me if I always check the history. I do not always check the history.—ウルタプ 18:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does this conversation have any sort of point?—ウルタプ 05:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to May (Pokémon). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Artichoker (Discussion) 01:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to May (Pokémon). Your edits are vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Artichoker (Discussion) 00:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Ash Ketchum. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Artichoker (Discussion) 18:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Ash Ketchum.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Artichoker (Discussion) 23:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page William Shatner has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to the page William Shatner constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Doulos Christos ♥ talk 01:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]