User talk:Snowysusan/Archive 4

re

Hey Susan,

i have mentioned few outside parties as reference, hope i have done it in proper way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikassharma2512 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Cosmic Biology

I do not believe my page needs adequate sources, as it is a system of beliefs, and thus, can not be proven or disproven. I myself, created this system of beliefs, and thus their are no sources to reference, other than the Religion's facebook page. This is a well thought out, scientific, system of beliefs, that is intelligent in its design, and explains many things about the nature of existence. As such, I believe that its Wikipedia Article should be verified for creation, as other people have the right to know about this Religion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Overdrive 418 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

New Article — Preceding unsigned comment added by BoatFan (talk • contribs) 22:27, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Hello Snowysusan,

You declined my page a few days ago, I made major edits based upon your suggestions. I resubmitted it, can you please review again and possibly approve?

Re: Cosmic Biology

If what you say is true, then every Wikipedia page about every Religion should be deleted, as no Religion is based upon verifiable information, as it cannot be proven or disproven. Overdrive 418 (talk) 22:34, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Vodans review

Hi Susan,

Thanks so much for helping me refine the Vodans page for inclusion on Wikipedia. I have added an additional reference supporting the release date. Is there anything else you can suggest before I resubmit it for review? Thanks in advance.

Cheers, Chris. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopher.widdowson (talk • contribs) 15:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Lael A. Alexander

Dear Susan~

Please tell me how to correct this. I am the publicist for Lael A. Alexander and his companies-I am the author of his websites so the content that I have posted here is by my own hand. I write all of the content for online and print use. I am simply trying to post it here as well. He is the inventor of a new frequency 802.11L and I have to have all of these things in order as the work goes to market. You can reach me at the office at 713-952-9034.

Thank you so much, Nicole Murray

Waves in the Sky Above

Dear Susan

The article that you declined because of not "adequately supported by reliable sources" is perfectly reliable, I think there's a mistake because the source Discogs is, let's say, "the wikipedia for music", I linked to Discogs because is the most trusted source on the net. I don't understand why you declined my submission. Please let me know what I have to do. There are plenty of sources on the net that prove that this album in question exist and it is fully supported for many labels around the world.

Thank you,

Suzanne Caseneuve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuCas (talk • contribs) 10:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

The article Call Recorder - IntCall was declined for 'not adequately supported by reliable sources'

This is an app I developed so I am the 'reliable source' for info about the app itself. Regarding other sections, can you please tell me which do not have sufficient reliable sources? thanks, Galit

Delay in review

Hey, I want to know why you are not checking my article since 3 to 4 days........Is there any reason, then please tell me....I am waiting for your reply. Thanks.

Call Recorder - intCall submission

Thanks you for the clarification. Actually the only reason I thought of adding this article was because I saw an article published by a competitive company so thought it was OK. I even used it as a template, changing the relevant details and adding more general info. I can only guess they were published because they hired someone who knows how to do it while I tried to do it by myself. So naive of me. And I thought Wiki was different. Thanks, Galit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Telestarinfo (talk • contribs) 20:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)