User talk:Snowgrouse

Cleanup

Cleaned up as of May 2017; too many spammy comments that have nothing to do with improving the wiki but just attempt to start a chat with me, and too many invitations I'm not interested in. NB: I'm not really here to chat about the topics I'm involved in; I'm sure there are discussion forums elsewhere on the Internet where you can find more like-minded people to discuss the stuff. Kindly have a look at the Talk page guidelines; it says right there that this place isn't a social forum.

However, of course, if it's something directly relating to an article, I'll take note! The above is just to notify the "hi, can you proofread my book for me" or "have you tried these mantras? They're really powerful!" folks.

Cheers. --Snowgrouse (talk) 05:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Snowgrouse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

: Why do Indian Wikipedians do this mass messaging thing? It was one of the main reasons I had to clean up my talk page--because I was constantly getting this kind of spam from Indian editors. I don't want to remove myself from WikiProject India, but it seems like I have to so I won't be spammed with this again. I don't even want to opt out of all mass messages, just the overenthusiastic Indian editors. Being a part of the project doesn't indicate I have the interest or the time for this kind of thing, sorry. --Snowgrouse (talk) 03:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicts of interest in academic publishing

Hi, Snowgrouse, I've clarified (hopefully) the bit you tagged in Conflicts of interest in academic publishing#Avoidance, disclosure, and tracking. Thank you for pointing out my jargon, and please let me know if it's still hard to understand.

You also corrected a misspelling, specifically "biassed"->"biased". I make plenty of spelling mistakes, but this one is actually a dialect difference; British English (and some Commonwealth Englishes, less consistently) double the last consonant when using some suffixes, I think because the sound is often repeated in pronunciation ("travel-ling"). Now I totally do not care what spelling variants are used, but some editors really, really, really care, so I thought I'd let you know before you run up against one. Official policy is to not edit war about it or gratuitously change style within an article: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Spelling. Since the article in question never had a consistent dialect (which is definitely my fault), there is nothing at all wrong with your edit, which was helpful, and this note is in no way intended to criticize you. HLHJ (talk) 17:41, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, and thanks for the pointer. I've only encountered "biassed" incredibly rarely even in US scientific/academic texts, so I was surprised to see it pop up. Too exhausted right now to go and check the article, but I appreciate the heads-up. --Snowgrouse (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Levänluhta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sami. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sauna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baltic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]