User talk:Snarkyalyx
November 2024
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bunq, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pridemanty (talk) 09:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Concerns Over Negative Content on Bunq Article and Potential Promotion of N26. Notice on behalf of Pridemanty - Cabayi (talk) 13:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi Snarkyalyx! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bunq several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Bunq, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, I wasn't even aware this was an edit war at the time, I just thought that the other person didn't read the comment in the reverts to discuss this in the talk page. Snarkyalyx (talk) 15:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Even if they are not engaging on the talk page, it's still an edit war unless an applicable exception applies. I don't quite see one that does. In the future, consider warning the other individual for edit warring using the {{uw-editwar}} template and then, if the other individual continues after the warning, consider making a report at the edit warring noticeboard. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Alright - I understand now, thanks a lot for your time and for the info! Snarkyalyx (talk) 16:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Even if they are not engaging on the talk page, it's still an edit war unless an applicable exception applies. I don't quite see one that does. In the future, consider warning the other individual for edit warring using the {{uw-editwar}} template and then, if the other individual continues after the warning, consider making a report at the edit warring noticeboard. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)