User talk:Pridemanty

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 23.84.96.19 (talk) 10:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An obvious WP:BOOMERANG case, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ddjjo. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:31, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't answered my question/s, please do or I'll ask an administrator to look into this matter.

There are many independent, reliable sources in this article, just one of them is from a blog, pray tell me what can be more independent or reliable than articles from well-known newspapers and television networks in Colombia? PLEASE be specific about which source you consider not suitable? These articles are not drafts and nevertheless they were accepted [some with reservations] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolina_Acevedo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adriana_Arboleda https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angie_Cepeda [no references] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carina_Cruz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mar%C3%ADa_Dalmazzo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mar%C3%ADa_Helena_Doering [no references] These articles contain some of the sources of my article, what is the difference? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danielle_Arciniegas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dora_Cadavid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_Caicedo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paulina_D%C3%A1vila This article has only references about her death: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adriana_Campos I can give you many more examples and please be specific about the difference between them and mine. GinnevraDubois (talk) 10:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC) GinnevraDubois (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft talk:Livy Renata

Hello! Please feel free to leave your feedback on my talk page regarding the appropriateness of the article. I have replaced some references that are not reliable sources and added careers. Does the article deserve to be moved to the main page? Badak Jawa (talk) 06:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bunq. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 13:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk I am not editing Bunq page now but as I can see they already reverted your edits too despite explaining to talk things to talk page first. I highly suspect this could be a Wiki Firm probably WikiBusines.Pridemanty (talk) 04:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit log shows none of Red-tailed hawk's post-XC protection edits (1, 2, 3) have been reverted. This is called lying. ElementW (talk) 09:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]