User talk:Snabbkaffe
Welcome!
|
Plip!
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Rosetta Barnstar |
| A multilingual person deserves the Rosetta barnstar SStephens13 (talk) 22:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC) |
February 2015
[edit]
Hello Snabbkaffe. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), or content (CSD A3), moments after they are created, as you did at Jose J. Tupaz Jr.. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. The page author has stated on the article's talk page that he has not yet finished writing the article. Gparyani (talk) 00:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Pushbullet Deletion
[edit]The page was a stub and I had reached out to the Pushbullet community to contribute more to the article. I've provided more reasons why it is notable on Talk:Pushbullet. Is it possible to undelete or view the contents of the deleted page? Can I update it to include links for why it's notable, or do I have to start from scratch? Beardedlinuxgeek (talk) 22:57, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry about this. I can not access any deleted data - so I'm sorry I can't help you there. If you want access to what you've written before, or would appeal to have the page reinstated, you should contact the administrator who deleted this article, User talk:Nawlinwiki, as I do not have such privileges. From what I could remember, the article could have been interpreted as advertising, so rewriting some parts might not be a bad thing. Again, I'm very sorry. I hope that you're not discouraged by this and continue to edit and improve Wikipedia! Snabbkaffe (talk) 23:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]A Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Swedish Barnstar of National Merit | |
| A small appreciation for all your contributions towards deleting articles! "Du gamla, du fria, du liten smorgåsbord... ...Ja, jag vill lida, jag vill dö i Sverige!" | ||
| this WikiAward was given to user:Snabbkaffe by SS13 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 2 March 2015 (UTC) |
Trouted
[edit]
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: A REASON
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For your exemplary dedication and courage in getting other people's hard work deleted SStephens13 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC) |
Joerg Spreitzer
[edit]Hello Snabbkaffe, as I am writing the first time on a talk page .. I hope i am doing right here. Thank you for visiting my first page (joerg spreitzer) and giving me notice that I did not do any references on the page. Now I have. I hope it is OK now. Thanks for your further comments. (196401yoyo (talk) 13:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC))
- Hello again @Snabbkaffe:. Thank you for visiting Joerg Spreitzers page again. the new entry is that the ressources have no reliable relevance. This I dont understand because DerStandard.at und Horizont are relevant newspaper or magazin in Austria. I added now additional ressources that the Lions are valid. Maybe I can also find Link to the Lions Archive (but this costs money to see online). A Lion is for Advertisiers like a Oscar in Film. And with the combination of beeing in the Jury at Cannes, London (LIA) and NY (design festival) it is quite unique in Austria. I hope this makes it relevant. Thank you for your information. (196401yoyo (talk) 19:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC))
@196401yoyo: The concerns are not regarding the validity of the sources, what I noticed is that it might not be encyclopedic content. I know that those awards/juries are impressive. I simply tagged it as it may not fulfill the notability criteria of Wikipedia. My concerns are that, although his CV is impressive to say the least, it may not meet the strict criteria of WP:BIO especially as the awards were, if I understand things correctly, given to his organization and not to him as an individual. Snabbkaffe (talk) 21:23, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Snabbkaffe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Snabbkaffe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Snabbkaffe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)