User talk:Smsarmad/Archives/2016/July
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Smsarmad. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Eid Mubarak!
Eid Mubarak! آپ کو اور آپ کے گھر والوں کو دل کی اتھاہ گہرائیوں سے عید کی خوشیاں بہت بہت مبارک۔ |
Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Sheriff. Eid Mubarak to you as well. --SMS Talk 05:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
BLA
Hey, SMS, same IP as had to change plans. Looked at that source, and while at first glance it seems to be an academic paper, I doubt it is. I base this on the fact it cites http://pksecurity.blogspot.com, and as near as I can see, the author of that blog is not an expert in the field of terrorism, let alone terrorism in Asia. Can you find out anything about him? Also, just because some blogger claims Brahumdagh Bugti accepted aid from India and Afghanistan does not make it true, he denies it, per BLP it has to be put as an allegation, along with his denial. What do you think?. 2A00:11C0:63:794:0:0:0:7 (talk) 16:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Actually, going by the source you provided the blogger, (or the authors of this paper) make the claim of indian aid from this quote, (domain no longer valid sadly) “We love our Indian friends and want them to help and rescue us from tyranny and oppression. In fact, India is the only country which has shown concern over the Baloch plight. We want India to take Balochistan’s issue to every international forum, the same way Pakistan has done to raise the so-called Kashmiri issue. We want India to openly support our just cause and provide us with all moral, financial, military and diplomatic support.” If so, then all that is being said there is they would accept help, not that they had received any. 2A00:11C0:63:794:0:0:0:7 (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)