Jump to content

User talk:SmileBlueJay97/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Speedy deletion of Jean-François Legendre-Héral

Hi, Thanks for the alert. I meant to link to an *existing* wiki article in French, but I don't why it won't stick. Cheers, RB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parker Bowring (talk • contribs) 11:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

The article was deleted under criteria (A3: Article has no meaningful, substantive content) of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. You'll need to create a page with sufficient content before you link to other pages.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  10:15, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Reintjes Gearboxes

Sir, Kindly review the rejection of 'Reintjes Gearboxes'. Reintjes GmbH is a leading marine gearbox manufacturer and is well known in the field of marine equipment.Praphull lal (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)<www.reintjes-gears.de><www.reintjesmiddleeast.com>

Institut de Management et de Communicatin Interculturels

Hi SmileBlueJay97, Thanks for your message about the Institut de Management et de Communication Interculturels. This article is an on-going translation of the French page. To translate the expressions the English website of the institute was very helpful. Is it not a way to add content to wikipedia? Thanks AudioTapeGirl (talk) 13:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello AudioTapeGirl. I'm not very sure what you mean but your article was deleted under criteria G12 of speedy deletion. It had an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.isit-paris.fr/-ISIT-since-1957-.html Never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others. This could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt Wikipedia. If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble. Please read WP:COPYRIGHT for more information.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  17:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Redirect to Aaron Yan

There were no references, therefore notability was not demonstrated. Deb (talk) 16:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

I see. The page was created about 2 minutes ago. Perhaps, you can add an {{unreferenced}} tag instead of redirecting it? There is always the note that says This page is only 2 minutes old. Consider waiting to tag it, unless the issue is serious. on the curation tool. I apologize for not adding the references before publishing it. I will add them on now. I also should of added the {{under construction}} tag to the page.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  17:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
I knew you were an experienced contributor and that it was probably an oversight. That's why I redirected it instead of deleting it. Deb (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nano programming

Hello SmileBlueJay97. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nano programming, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It may well be a neologism, or just an emergent technology, but A7 doesn't apply to technology innovations, nor can it possibly be spam as it's not advertising anything. If youo think it should be deleted, then take it to AfD. Thank you. GedUK  12:05, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for notifying. I was going to nominate the article for Afd but it was still deleted by User:Alexf under criteria A7 of speedy deletion. The creator was also blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia for promotional purposes.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  14:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of James_Overall

Hi SmileBlueJay97, the page isn't a hoax. The information is completely factual, and if you would like evidence of the Royal British Artist's fact, then feel free to pay for a subscription to docstoc.com and download: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/164530522/Annual-Exhibition-2012---The-Royal-Society-of-British-Artists

Kind regards,

KingAresIV — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingAresIV (talk • contribs) 15:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

The page is a blatant hoax. You wrote about your gaming history written in first person POV. Under the section 'Death and Afterward' you wrote 'Currently alive.' Under section 'Philosophical and political views' you wrote 'Wikipedia is not a soapbox for individuals to espouse their views. However, views held by politicians, writers, and others may be summarized in their biography only to the extent those views are covered by reliable sources that are independent of the control of the politician, writer, etc.' You also cited references as <ref>Last, first (date). [http://URL Name of page]. Page xx. Publisher: xxxx</ref>.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  17:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Hit By Lightning

can you help me. why is every other movie in the world on wiki but you keep deleted my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Ades (talk • contribs) 16:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mike Ades. I tagged the article under criteria A7 of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. The article currently fails WP:MOVIE. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (films) for guidelines on film notability. WP:TOOSOON also applies. I strongly recommend that you use Articles for Creation instead of creating a new article directly: doing so may grant more leeway with respect to various rules/policies/guidelines/best practices. Read this page for tips on starting an article. If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me here.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  16:43, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Problem usernames

Hi SmileBlueJay97. Just thought I would pass along some advice about reporting usernames to WP:UAA, as was given to me a while back. If the username is very obviously a problem and the account is editing abusively (e.g. corporate username posting advertising, someone impersonating a notable person and editing their biography, etc.), report it to UAA but don't leave any warning on the user's talk page. Leaving a {{uw-coi-username}} template automatically inserts them into the UAA holding pen (WP:UAA/HP) and the admins have no choice but to grant the user a grace period and give them the opportunity to change their username. In the interim, they have more opportunity to inflict further damage.

If there is some ambiguity with the username and their edits but you still believe it violates the username policy, then the {{uw-coi-username}} template would be an appropriate notice to leave. If they look like they have a problem username but no edit history at all, the {{uw-username}} template would do. --Drm310 (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Drm310. Thank you very much for this advice. I have a much better understanding on what to do with problem usernames now.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  17:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome. I should add that there's another instance where the {{uw-coi-username}} template is appropriate - if the user has a problem username/edits, but their edits have been in only the Articles for Creation or Draft spaces. That's considered a lesser infraction, and therefore they deserve the chance to redeem themselves with a username change.
I know it can be confusing on the interpretation and application of the username policy and its associated mechanisms. It took me a while to learn the intricacies of it all. Keep up the good work! --Drm310 (talk) 19:54, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Civility

Don't call test edits vandalism, it's needless biting of new users. Test edits are also deleted, so there's no upshot to namecalling. WilyD 10:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

I didn’t think tagging a page for G3 would be considered offending or namecalling as the articles do seem like hoaxes. Thank you for notifying. I understand now and will make sure to tag the articles for G2 instead in the future.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  11:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

The Soldiers' Charity

Hello,

In response to your flagging of the Soldiers' Charity wiki page, you may have seen a note contesting it from one of my colleagues here at ABF The Soldiers' Charity.

Essentially, the current wikipedia page for the Army Benevolent Fund is out of date, and so is the URL /Army_Benevolent_Fund

As we re-branded a few years ago to ABF The Soldiers' Charity, more commonly known just as The Soldiers' Charity, we felt we needed a new Wikipedia page, so that the URL is correct, hoping that /Army_Benevolent_Fund would one day just re-direct to the new page.

The page isn't being used for fundraising asks or anything like that, rather it is, with citations, explaining in a factual manner who we are and what we do as a charitable organisation. I can't seem to edit the /Army_Benevolent_Fund page either - I think it thinks I'm vandalising it! And even so, not being able to change the URL means we're still listed on Wikipedia under our old branding.

As the British Army's national charity it's important we maintain good online awareness, so I do hope our new Wikipedia entry will be allowed, and the previous /Army_Benevolent_Fund page re-directed to /wiki/The_Soldiers'_Charity

If you have any queries on any of our edits or requests, the best place to catch me on is at cmirzai@soldierscharity.org

Many thanks & keep up the good work.

Chris Mirzai Digital Communications Officer ABF The Soldiers' Charity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesoldierscharity (talk • contribs) 11:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Chris Mirzai. I have removed the speedy deletion template from the article but there are still some issues in the page that needs to be fixed.
  • Wikipedia needs reliable, independent sources to support its content - of the references you've provided, only the bigcurry.org one could be considered to meet those criteria. All of the rest are from The Soldiers' Charity themselves, which makes them highly suspect (and look like promotion.
  • The article has an unclear citation style. Simply copying and pasting the URL of an online reference is not helpful in the event of linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. See Wikipedia:Bare URLs for more information.
  • You have a conflict of interest to the subject. All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.
  • Your current username may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website.
I have redirected Army Benevolent Fund to The Soldiers' Charity. If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me here.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  11:36, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi there,

Thanks for your quick response and for taking down the deletion template *and* adding the re-direct. I'll edit the citations and update them accordingly.

Many thanks

Chris — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesoldierscharity (talk • contribs) 13:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Re-write of "Dot Chinese Online" and "Dot Chinese Website" Articles

Hello SmileBlueJay97,

We contested the deletion of the articles "Dot Chinese Online" and "Dot Chinese Website" and mentioned that we would rewrite the articles. We went ahead and rewrote the articles. Let us know if we still need to make changes.

Thank you, Allegravita — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allegravita (talk • contribs) 18:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Merseyside Polonia

I strongly would consider AFD for this article. It looks well written, cites sources and serves a major community. RWCasinoKid (talk) 10:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Created by someone with WP:COI. No attempt to provide evidence of notability. No external sourcing - in fact, relies entirely on its own website.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  11:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

ESSL Security

Please let me know what the solution is. i wanted this page to be live as it is important. Please point to the specific content on the page that violates the policies. I would be glad to do so. Would you like to help me out instead?. I would be thankful to you.

Regards, Arun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunessl (talk • contribs) 11:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
I have altered the content and hope its all clean. Please let me know what should i do in keeping the page from being suspended.
Regards,
Arun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunessl (talk • contribs) 11:47, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Arun. Here's a quick review of the main issues.

  • You have a conflict of interest to the subject. All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations.
  • Try creating an article ‪using Wikipedia:Article wizard‬ the next time. Using Articles for Creation instead of creating a new article directly may grant more leeway with respect to various rules/policies/guidelines/best practices.

Feel free to contact me here if you have any more questions..  SmileBlueJay97  talk  12:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
thank your time. I will re write the entire content from the scratch. So can i delete the entire content and do it again?.
Regards,
Arun — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunessl (talk • contribs) 12:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Arun, Of course you can rewrite the article. I have added {{speedy deletion-author request}} tag to the article. The article should be taken down soon. Use Wikipedia:Article wizard‬ to create your article. Your article will need to be reviewed before it goes 'live'. It will first be created as a draft stored in Articles for creation. When you finish, you'll be able to submit it to be reviewed by volunteers (you can add a message here and I'll review it for you). After a successful review, it will be moved to the article namespace. Read this page for tips on starting an article.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  12:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi! Thanks for the wikignoming on my talk/user page. Hasn't gone unnoticed. Best,  Philg88 ♦talk 16:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

You're more than welcome. Congratulations again on your RFA!  SmileBlueJay97  talk  21:29, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot

Hi SmileblueJay,

Thank you so much for your time. Once am done with the article writing, i would definitely get it to your notice.

Regards, Arun

No problem. Good luck and feel free to drop a message here if you need help with the article writing.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  21:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Email

Hi i emailed you. Hannah.santas (talk)

Hey, I read your email. Which article were you referring to? Also please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) in the future. Thank you.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  20:43, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Lambda Delta Psi Sorority, Incorporated has been deleted per G11 and G12 of speedy deletion.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  01:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.

Hello SmileBlueJay97,

I just new to wikipedia and not familiar with what can be included in an encyclopedia. Thank you for your message,and I will be more careful in edit a page next time. BTW:I am not completely agreed with wikipedia's A7 criterion,for it seems to differ from my view to an encyclopedia. But every institute has its own rules,so I can perceive(I am not sure whether this word is fitted here or not,for my english is not very well) it. --Easpillar (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello Easpillar. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia. Your article was deleted under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. All article topics must also be verifiable with independent, third-party sources. The person have not yet received enough attention to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. You may also want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles in the future. Feel free to contact me here if you have any more questions.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  02:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Your copying of plot summaries from external websites

(I have subsequently removed these sections). This is a violation of the copyright policy. What's going on? MER-C 04:11, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey MER-C. I apologize for the copy-right. I know it's a very bad excuse but I started creating articles about dramas this month and followed the template/outline of the dramas created before. I think we have a big problem here. I just did a brief check and found that almost every single drama created has copy-right issues....(2000-2010)(2011-present).  SmileBlueJay97  talk  04:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Another check: many of the korean dramas have copy-right issues as well...from 1997 to 2014  SmileBlueJay97  talk  05:04, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
I have brought this issue to Wikipedia talk:Suspected copyright violations.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  05:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Yes, this is a perennial problem. It looks like all the copyvios are fixed and you have learned from this incident, so I'm not going to take further action. If you see any editors who are repeatedly copying or faithfully translating plot summaries (be aware that copying may be from Wikipedia; sure signs of a plot summary copyvio are lack of spoilers and promotional tone) please let me know. MER-C 10:55, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Review request for eSSL Security article

Hi SmileBluJay,

I have created an new article with the same title (essl Security).I have submitted it for the review. Can you please review it for me?.

Regards, Arun

Hey Arun. It seems like your submission has been declined by Revent. I would have made the same decision. You still haven’t addressed the issues that we’ve discussed above. Please see the comment that I’ve added to the draft. Also please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) in the future. Thank you.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  10:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
(nods) To show notability, you need to show that the company has received 'significant' media coverage that is over a period of time, and not all related to one specific event. This means things like newspaper, magazine, or industry journal articles that are primarily about the company, or give it several paragraphs of discussion. Things like blogs or press releases don't count, neither do entries in 'comprehensive databases' like Bloomberg, or the 'two paragraph' type of pro-forma coverage of business events such as contract signings. The article also must be primarily based upon what has been said about the company in those sources.
Also, the 'products' section you have now reads like the kind of 'this is important because of (whatever) and we offer the perfect solution' foo that is written by advertising people. Reventtalk 10:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Please recover WxMEdit

This page WxMEdit should not be speedily deleted:

It was NOT promotion:

  • It was similar to [[Notepad++] and MadEdit, they are not promotion, nor does wxMEdit.
  • It was referenced in MadEdit. There need a artcle wxMEdit.
  • The relationship of MadEdit and wxMEdit is similar to Open Office and LibreOffice that both of them exsit.

If you still regard it was promotion, please explain why Notepad++ and MadEdit were not but wxMEdit was. Nicholas martin 2013 (talk) 15:57, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

If you can not explain I will recreate the article since there are a lot works done by me to collect and typeset. And I found you tried to delete MadEdit either, dou you have any enmity about MadEdit and it's successor?
Nicholas martin 2013 (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi Nicholas martin 2013. Here's a quick review of the main issues. As the page has already been deleted, I can't recall all the issues on the page.

The article has been deleted twice under WP:G11 and once under WP:A7 of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion.

  • An encyclopedic article should be about the software - it's history, significance and purpose. What you've got is largely just a list of features and updates, which make the article seem highly promotional. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. For more information please see what wikipedia is not.
  • Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. The tone of the article is overly flattering and does not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia.
  • Wikipedia needs independent, third-party sources to support its content, all the sources you've provided are from WxEdit themselves, which makes them highly suspect (and also looks like further promotion).
  • Please do NOT add promotional content as you did to MadEdit here. Personal opinions about how you think wxMEdit is superior to MadEdit-PV will be removed.
  • The article also fails WP:NSOFT. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (software) for guidelines on software notability.
  • If you want the article restored, you should go ask Alexf or RHaworth and provide a valid reason in support of your position. Please also see WP:REFUND.

I assure you that I don't tag articles for deletion due to personal enmities. I tag them for deletion because they do not meet Wikipedia guidelines. Regarding MadEdit, this is an example of why "If article X then article Y." is fallacious. The article also has issues that needs to be fixed. Please feel free to contact me here if you have any other questions.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  18:35, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

(I moved your response below)
  • Well, The first edition of the article I've written DID contain it's history, significance and purpose., but the bot said it was copyed from google code. OK. Then I wrote the second editon in my words, I must confess that the edition lacked significance and purpose. But the rest of the article is not the features and updates, but the description what's the difference between wxMEdit and MadEdit.
  • While there was a long list of features and suppored programming languages in Notepad++, I didn't mean "if article X then article Y", but is was a model, an example that a description of software had a feature list is NOT a reason to be treat as promotion.
  • The article I wrote did not contain any words of praise. All content were described as is. While it was common sense that a continually maintained fork had less bug and more features than the discontinued one.
  • The content in MadEdit was not added by me and I agreed that it should be removed. While there was no similar words in my article at all.
  • Explaining so much, I just intend to not be deleted thoughtlessly when reocver/repost it. If any section was not suitable enough, just delete/ rewrite the section, just like what did by User:Discospinster for MadEdit. I didn't intend to promote it, but please don't treat it was promotion every time just because other one have ever promoted it. Thanks. Nicholas martin 2013 (talk) 07:15, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

The bot sent you the message probably because you used copy-righted material. (See WP:COPYVIO). By this is an example of why "If article X then article Y." is fallacious. I meant that notability of one package does not automatically mean that others are notable as well. Wikipedia is not a directory of all software that can be confirmed to exist. Software that is just another entry in a crowded field will need more persuasively significant sources, of a kind that indicate that it stands out from the crowd. The main problem really isn’t that you didn’t include the significance and purpose, the tone, or that it was promotional. The main problem is that the article fails notability. There is no significant coverage found in independent reliable sources. Please see Wikipedia: Notability (software) for guidelines on software notability. If uptakes continue and coverage starts to accrue, the article can be recreated.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  08:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Help please

Hi! If you're so inclined, I'd appreciate your wikignomeness on my user page. I want to expand the text section starting "Need a map..." and before I do that I'd like the 10 user boxes grouped into two columns of five (which will move the whole block left a bit). The text should start as far up the page as possible like yours does. The Babel stuff should ideally stay where it is over on the far right. I could probably figure out how to do this, but you seem to be much better versed in such things than I am. Feel free to decline, ask questions, tell me it's impossible, shout expletives etc. Cheers,  Philg88 ♦talk 16:21, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Blimey that was quick! Many thanks, exactly what I wanted. FWIW, re the CSD request in the preceding section, IMHO it does significantly differ from the deleted page and is not overly promotional in tone. I will leave it to a more experienced admin will know more than me to decide whether to delete or decline. That said, at first glance it's an unreferenced article and if after checking whether it has the requisite sources to meet WP:GNG and/or WP:NSOFTWARE, it's certainly a candidate for AfD. Best,  Philg88 ♦talk 18:08, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi! You're very welcome. Feel free to contact me again if you need my help on anything. I also agree that I should have checked more thoroughly before I tagged the page for deletion. My mistake. I tagged the page for G4 after I saw that it has been deleted per AfD but didn't notice that the software were different. I also tagged it for G11 after seeing the promotional sounding content that was later removed and didn't see that the development of the software has already stopped. I will be more careful in checking in the future.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  19:14, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Removing the CSD tag was a good call. If you want to go for the AfD, do the WP:BEFORE and if you draw a blank, go right ahead. Check your email in five minutes, I'm about to send you a message. Cheers,  Philg88 ♦talk 19:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  08:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

EnrichLA

Hello there. I was hoping to get more information about the deletion of the EnrichLA page. It was tagged for deletion because it "seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons." What are these reasons? So we can address them. Thank you 

Benlomondla (talk) 02:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey Benlomondla. The article was deleted per G11 (Unambiguous advertising or promotion) and G12 (Unambiguous copyright infringement) of speedy deletion.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  08:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Joshua Vescovi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Vescovi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Vescovi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

I have voted in the page, though I ask you to exercise caution when posting on multiple talk pages to attract attention for a discussion.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  08:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Re-verification for eSSL Security article

Dear SmileBlueJay,

I have removed the contents that contradicts with Wikipedia policies.

Please find the details on the changes made,

  • Contents on products have been removed as it was more of an advertisement.
  • External links linking to blogs and newsletter has been removed.

I personally think the article is ok to be accepted. Please review the article and do the needful.

Regards, Arun Arunessl (talk) 04:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey Arun. I have declined your submission. Your draft has been declined twice because it does not meet notability guidelines. The submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  08:55, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Deleted article

Did you look at the article before you deleted it? Contributorzero (talk) 16:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Seriously, I put some effort into the Mohamed al-Zahawi article you deleted, I would like to know if you looked at it before you deleted it. Contributorzero (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey Contributorzero. Sorry for the late reply, I have been fairly preoccupied with work these few days. I tagged the article for deletion but I wasn't the one that deleted it. If you want the article restored, you should go ask Fuhghettaboutit and provide a valid reason in support of your position. CorenSearchBot performed a web search with the contents of Mohamed al-Zahawi and found that the article appears to include material copied directly from www.globaljihad.net/view_page.asp?id=2257. If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  14:00, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
@Contributorzero: Hello Contributorzero. I have looked at the deleted content again, and again compared it to the source it was marked as a copyright violation of. It is almost entirely copied and pasted from that source and so it was properly deleted, will not be undeleted, and should not have been posted by you. You may not have been aware you could not do this but now that you do, please be very careful to respect other's copyright. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Page marked for deletion

Hi,

You marked a page for deletion and I responded to request to change it - however, you have not responded. Can i not change this page so it can be approved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmberPT2014 (talk • contribs) 08:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey AmberPT2014. Of course you can change the content. Please feel free to do so.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  14:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

bare URL

bare URL fix tool is not working, can u help any other option or tool, can u please provide the link Mardaani (talk) 10:17, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey Mardaani. Which article do you need help on? I'll help you fill in the references.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  13:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

DELI Amsterdam

Hi Smiley! Thanks for letting me know my premier page was marked for deletion however I wasn't able to make the changes you suggested in time. I have done my best to make them now here and really would appreciate your input/feedback. It is my aim to make more pages of new additions to Amsterdam's tourism scene like this to add the Amsterdam main Wiki page to make it even better for users. BECAUSE the Visitor’s Survey (2012) http://www.iamsterdam.com/amsterdam%20visitor%20survey%202012 reveals that 75% of visitors consult the internet before deciding to visit Amsterdam. :) Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amsterfiend (talk • contribs) 10:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey Amsterfiend. I moved your page to Articles for creation draft. Please see my comments in the page. Also please leave new messages to the bottom of my talk page or else I might not see them and please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) in the future. Thank you.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  13:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Giselle Garcia Reality TV Speedy Deletion

The page is about a reality star currently filming for a VH1 reality show.

Social Media: twitter.com/giselle_envy Instagram.com/giselle_envy www.facebook.com/GiselleGarciaVh1

articles including Giselle http://blog.vh1.com/2014-05-14/vh1-transamerica-press-release/ (Click view photo gallery and Giselle is 3rd or 4th photo and her bio is there)

http://variety.com/2014/tv/news/vh1-orders-tyra-banks-gay-rosenthal-produced-docuseries-transamerica-1201181464/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qorqeousd (talk • contribs) 15:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Garcia does not appear notable enough for her own article, but if an article gets written about TransAmerica, then a redirect to that article might be in order. Unfortunately, as of yet, no such article has been created. Also social media such as twitter, instagram, facebook and blogs are not reliable sources.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  16:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel

Okay man, listen! I'm 14 years old and live in Denmark, I speak perfectly good english, but the phrase: "speedy deletion-advertising" and "speedy deletion-significance" makes no sense to me. I don't know what they mean, but I can assure you 'The Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel' is both a real and loved YouTube channel. This was going to my surprise for Douglas (the creator) and hopefully I would then become 'Member of the Month'! I have a LOT to work on that I have not yet writen (Like the Secret Oath and Membership Roster) and I would appreciate if you could explain to me what the problem is, and what I have to do to fix it! I used to write this page on another page (for YouTubers only) but their Source Mode was way to hard for me, so I changed to you and your flowless system. Please get back to me, and reconsider your choise! I am sure we can figure this out, and come to agreements. Thank you for reconsidering, -Rasmus Hartwich — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasmus Hartwich (talk • contribs) 16:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey Rasmus Hartwich. Even though the YouTube channel may be real and loved it has not yet received enough attention to satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please see A7. No indication of importance and G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion for more information.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  05:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SmileBlueJay97/Archive_2&oldid=1050201193"