User talk:Smeddlesboy

DYK

On October 18, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Laura Spence Affair, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Well guess who created the Wellfield page? Sure you can work it out by looking at my contributions! & I remember you going on about Andorra by Max Frisch back in high school.... Nice to see your interests haven't changed too much! Claret 17:05, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although... have you seen how many people have edited the WBHS page?! And the VGMS one was started by someone else.... Claret 17:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

link to British

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom, Great Britain or British English by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 01:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK!

On 9 January, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Leighton, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 22:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Leonard

Hi, I noticed that you have included Leonard's spouse as Graham Turner and removed the bit about her being married to Alex Mansfield. I have some references that she married Mansfield in 2000 [1] (if you enlarge the scan you'll be able to read this in the corner). Another news article I have from 1996 says that she and Turner were together (but not married) for many years, but clearly they must have split before she married in 2000. Do you know if she and Mansfield divorced and she went on to reunite and marry Turner? I'm not doubting what you have added, i just want to make sure it's all sourced so that nobody can argue against it :) Gung adin ♦ 20:12, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dalkeith High School

I have nominated Dalkeith High School, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalkeith High School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —BradV 00:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Newbattlehs.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Newbattlehs.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Are you that maths teacher at newbattle high school who is Mr Watkins? I figured it out with the box things on your userpage--Spongefrog (talk) 22:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saltersgate School

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Saltersgate School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability since 9/2007. I don't believe this one is notable; it's a school for special needs children. Total of 11 hits on Gnews, all of which are incidental mentions.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ray^Talk 22:32, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This guy won't respond, he's on a very long Wikibreak.--Spongefrog (talk) 10:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Smeddlesboy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

David Smith (botanist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Newbattle Community High School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

frame-1-2919221|accessdate=7 July 2013|newspaper=Edinburgh Evening News|date=3rd May 2013}}</ref> (the source article erroneously refers to John as a "former History teacher" but he is still

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Initial teacher education

A tag has been placed on Initial teacher education, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not WP:DICDEF

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Werieth (talk) 15:15, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Smeddlesboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam Nelson (footballer)

The article Adam Nelson (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never played at a fully professional level. WP:FOOTYN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Nelson (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Nelson (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Nelson (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 05:28, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Smeddlesboy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Smeddlesboy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Through the Dragon's Eye episodes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Through the Dragon's Eye episodes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Through the Dragon's Eye episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- D'n'B-t -- 09:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]