User talk:SmashStar30

Welcome!

Hello, SmashStar30, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses ^{(talk) (contribs)} _{Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page} 20:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of video game genres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gran Turismo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rocket Start (Mario Kart 8 Deluxe).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rocket Start (Mario Kart 8 Deluxe).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Charizard (Super Smash Bros. Ultimate).png

Thank you for uploading File:Charizard (Super Smash Bros. Ultimate).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial details

Please stop adding unnecessary trivial details like "The match begins when the announcer counts down..." and similar. Please give WP:VGSCOPE a read as well. -- ferret (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks re Eurovision Home Concerts note

I truly appreciate your comments about my work on this Eurovision Home Concerts series. From your notes I see you appreciated the series from day 1 when they put it up on 14 April where you say: "Eurovision's YouTube channel did a great job broadcasting Home Concerts and this Friday, more artists will perform their hits". Isn't it fascinating how this series makes us revisit Eurovision in fresh new eyes and you rediscover the songs and how beautiful they are? You appreciate the thought put beyond them. Then come the covers with a whole new take on the songs they are covering? My heart melted. The moment I started watching the three videos up till now for April 3, 10 and 17, my first instinct was to open the Eurovision 2020 page on Wikipedia and there was only one lonely sentence about the series. Right there and then I decided it was well worth my while to work on this and develop it. So I created a section. And while watching, every time I heard an artist, I would add his or her name to the list after verifying their names and proper spelling. So the section you see now was a reflection of what I was watching the videos in real time. That's the reason for all these edits as they were real time for me. Then, and I am on episode 3 and trying to edit, suddenly Sergey Lazarev and Elena Paparizou come on my screen to sing a duo version of "You're the Only One" and suddenly I started crying as I found their duo interpretation so touching, genuine, impressive and heart warming. And I knew I had done the right thing on Wikipedia. I was amazed by all the artists, but the series hit a nerve in me after having confined myself in my home for weeks now. But these three minutes by Sergey and Elena just melted my heart. So as a token of thanks I dedicate to you that interpretation here. Enjoy! I know you worked a lot on the "Love, Shine a Light" Eurovision show. But you must know I adore that song by Katrina and if you would go to my User page, just below my multilingual greetings, I say "Love, shine a light ... and werldwayd wishing for you the world" (it's a play on my edit name). So there a link between what you did for the Love, Shine a Light page, and you did quite a lot, and my whole belief in Wikipedia as a great work of love and dedication to shine for the world. So through this section, it is a beacon to benefit from the Home Concert Series. So, since "Love Shine a Light" means so much to me as well, I dedicate the music video of that great song to you as well here. Cheers and many thanks. werldwayd (talk) 07:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you see, an esteemed colleague deleted everything I added in one sweeping revert. So knowing less by Eurovision 2020 readers is more I guess. I was planning a live editing process for day 4 of the broadcasts, but I won't bother. It's futile. Just remind you that the fourth episode is on in about 30 minutes. Good listening. werldwayd (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Major 2nd. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

If you ever need any help with disruptive editors, please contact me via my talk page. I can place notices just like this one. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 18:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification regarding last message

When undoing, please distinguish as an edit war. If you come across disruption like this again, please get in touch with me or another more experienced editor. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Schulte (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Urban (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Bowser (character), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 23:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hey you're welcome

for the edit of bowser, if you want to have a friend like me. come chat with me anytime --Eliskuya2 (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Today is your birthday

Today is not the 31st so how is it your birthday? MrRedPanda25 (talk) 02:00, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts

Hello. Quick question. Have you ever edited under another account? You remind me of another editor. Let me know. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 12:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I see you’re editing and not responding to me, and the more I look into it, the more certain I feel, so I’ll be blunt, I’m pretty certain you’re block evading. I need a response to you on this. Sergecross73 msg me 18:38, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I'm not block evading. Second, I have a different account. The reason my first one is blocked is because of the disruptive editing. That is why I'm replying with a friendly smile. 18:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Editing on a different account after your first one was blocked is textbook block-evading. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 18:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, unfortunately, as Thomas points out, “editing under another account because the prior one was blocked” is exactly what block evasion is. And it’s not allowed. And while there are opportunities for second chances, the problem is, you’re still making the same mistakes you did with your prior account. You are still adding the same type of bad screenshots, and add a lot of minor details that aren’t helpful. As such, you are blocked again. Please stop making accounts, or you’ll be blocked every time you’re discovered again. Sergecross73 msg me 20:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Okay, you got me! I deserved it so, I'm leaving Wikipedia with a friendly smile! SmashStar30 (talk) 00:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Best of luck with your other hobbies. Sergecross73 msg me 13:46, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]