User talk:Slugger O'Toole/Archive 1

Welcome to the WikiProject Catholicism 101!

Hello, Slugger O'Toole/Archive 1, and welcome to the Wikiproject:Catholicism 101! Thank you for your generous offer to help contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project Talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and God Bless! -- MamaGeek TALK CONTRIB 13:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CST

I think that between us we should be able to significantly clean up/improve this page, but we need to agree on somekinda overall strategy. I think that the fundamentals contribution represented a serious improvement, by helping to draw all the elements together, and making it clear how the RCC understands and builds its ST. Without it the whole article loooks like a fairly arbitary set of rules and conditions. Lets talk about it on the Talk page a bit before we get into any more editing. Phil 20686 13:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KOC Note

Thanks for the heads up on the Knights of Columbus article... I'd be happy to help out, but I'm not sure what to do. Is there anything specific I can do to help? Clint 01:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Pius XII

Thanks for your comments. One question: do you remember the source for the fact that Pius distributed money to people when Rome got bombed? This was removed a long time ago by another user because there was no source provided. If there is a source, we also need a date for when this happened. Also some context. Pius performed many acts of charity during the war, some notable, some not. If he distributed a lot of money though, this seems notable. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 23:57, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find that I addressed all of your comments with the following exceptions: I really don't know how to follow up on this Knights of Columbus video and I don't have a book on me right now that talks about Pius's relationship with Japan. I'll see what I can do on these. As for Dalin's book, it was cited already, but I added a sentence linking to it. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 03:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vote in progress to move Counter-Reformation to Catholic Reformation

This move makes sense because Counter-Reformation implies that that the movement was against reform. Rather as a reform movement within the Catholic Church, it is most precisely known as the Catholic Reformation. This is now the more favored term in academic theological circles.

Please stop by talk:Counter-Reformation for the vote. Thanks, --Vaquero100 19:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi

But as I pointed out, I'm a heathen, and worse, an evil homosexual who'll burn in hell for ever if your church has its way. I'm just not interested in the topic, and I'm offended by the way the church has focused on people's genitals for the past century, and killed thousands (millions?) of African women because of the ban on condoms.

Having said that, I want your article to be in the best prose possible. Surely there are WPians who are sympathetic to the cause ... Have you tried researching the categories of WPians? What about other catholic-oriented articles—look at the history for each, and find good copy-editors. This would be an investment in your future WP contributions, too.

Tony 15:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AndyZ may be willing. Fg2 is good. So is Ubercryxic. But these people may not appreciate my recommendation, and may have the same qualms as I do. Good luck. Tony 17:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KofC

Hello, the KofC article is in very good shape and there's not too much copy editing to do. I worked on the intro so as to make it more readable, and I think it's stronger now. I did delet "family" and I apologise if that needs to be in there, though I think "fraternal service organization" covers it and the family aspect becomes apparent later in the article. Let me know if you have any questions regarding that. Murcielago 14:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic devotions

Hey Briancua.

I just started the Catholic devotions article. It's not much yet, but it is a start. Thanks for your interest. --Vaquero100 17:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categories in userspace

Hi! I noticed that in your scratchpad / draft / alternative article User:Briancua/list you have the categories still activated, so it's showing up in Category:Animals and a few others. Could I suggest that you deactivate them (by putting a colon before 'Category' in the link) until such time as the article is in the mainspace rather than the userspace? (As per WP:CG, "If you copy an article to your user namespace (for example, as a temporary draft or in response to an edit war) you should decategorize it".) Cheers, Ziggurat 01:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrigh Violation!??! I am the one who wrote it all...

Regarding: Doug Obey on Wikipedia

Why on earth would it be a copyright violation if I am the one who wrote it??

I created the website (And wrote ALL of the content within it... )therefore I have every right to copy my own creations and use them as such on Wikipedia.

Please remove the copyright violation. I GIVE PERMISSION! (otherwise I wouldn't have posted it!)

Thank you,

Jason Stadtlander Stadtlander Designs (If you have any doubts, look at the bottom of the website... it says "STADTLANDER DESIGNS" at the bottom)

Theology of the Body

Thanks for the Theology of the Body section on the CC page, Brian. We desperately need a comprehensive approach to this teaching on WP. Maybe you or I should propose this on the collaboration page. Vaquero100 02:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that and voted in support of your nomination. Good going, Brian. Vaquero100 02:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pope John Paul the Great

Why did you remove every instance of Pope John Paul the Great? --Briancua 23:32, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a redirect to the actual article, and there's no consensus in the world at large that this should be his title. You'll notice that I didn't touch the discussion of the subject in the article, since it was well-cited, and that I didn't mess with people's sandboxes. --Sar e kOfVulcan 00:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Catholicism Assessment

Hello, fellow WikiProject Catholicism member. The project has recently begun work on assessing articles relating to Catholicism, and you are invited to comment and participate. The subpage for this assessment is located here. Thank you. —Mi ra 07:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

Congratulations, Brian, I just saw that K of C made it to featured status! I know that was a big goal for you. Well done. Vaquero100 03:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lies My Teacher Told Me

How was the see also section to A People's History of the United States irrelevant? Like Lies, it focuses on parts of American history that aren't always talked about in your everyday classroom. Also, see [[Textbook#High_school|here]. Amazon.com's page for Lies also includes People's History in the "Customers who bought this item also bought" section. [1] It also says that 56% of people who get Lies also buy People's History. AK Press's page for Lies says "File alongside Zinn's People's History Of The United States". [2]. This page has People's History listed as a related book. Here are a bunch of comments people have made about Lies, and a few of them also mention People's History. I'm not the only one who thinks they are relevant to one another. I'm going to put it back in, but if you want to take it out again, feel free to mention it on the article's talk page (I have it watched). Thanks. Ungovernable Force^{The Wiki Kitchen!} 12:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church

There is a vote at Talk:Roman Catholic Church: A Vote on the Title of this Article on moving Roman Catholic Church to Catholic Church. You are invited to review it. --WikiCats 04:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of rowing blades

Have you see this page? --evrik 17:31, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

link to Iranian

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something Iranian, please do not link to Iranian, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as Iranian people, or Iran, by writing out [[Iranian people|Iran]] or [[Iran|Iranian]]. Regards, Jeff3000 06:24, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:O'boyle hall.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:O'boyle hall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy of UCA does not constitute permission to release under GFDL -Nv8200p talk 17:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weld Family

Thank you for correcting that point of information in my article on The Welds. I misunderstood the info in the William Weld article. I edited the later so others won't make the same error.

I see you have done work on several articles re: Greater Boston. I've been contributing in this area as well. You can see a list of my original articles on my user page. Not only might some of them be of interest to you, they are all very new and may not have been proof read by anyone other than me. It would be nice to have someone savvy about Boston and Norfolk County look at them. Happy Holidays. ◄HouseOfScandal ►08:26, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Society in Dedham for Apprehending Horse Thieves

This article has been nominated for deletion through the AfD process. Rklawton 16:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, here are some of my concerns about the article on pornography addiction.

Yes... i hated to use James Dobsons views as an attack, and I know that i should not have. but the main problem is that there are NO I repeat NO counter claims in defense of pornography with a reputable source and easily verifiable claims. This ALONE on such a hotly debated (Though perhaps not quite as much nowadays as in the 90's) topic... is good standing to almost INSTANTLY slap a POV notification, as well as a weasel word template due to it only giving the reader (Whom as i've said in numerous other topics with matters similar to this) Might just be looking for answers, research, or an average teenager trying to see if looking at pornoraphy will send them to hell or not etc. etc.

So that's why I consider it important that at least an EQUAL amount of statements for both sides of this debate be placed INSIDE the article and be in a seperate section for each of them which is easily viewable. (Perhaps set up the article so it has general definition of addiction first, then general info on the debate, and then seperate sections for views FOR and AGAINST or vice versa of the existence and proliferation of pornography addiction which conform to ALL wikipedia standards.)

I think this should be a minimum and that the internet section should have extra details added, and the plethora of recovering from addiction links be shortened down to a few informational ones instead of five links leading to different pages on a single website.

I think this is quite reasonable and I hope that this can be met up with on your part

Nateland 20:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Primal Scream (Harvard)

Can you prove that you were the author of the photos you uploaded to this article (i.e. with the meta-data, etc.)? Savidan 00:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:John W. O'Reilly.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:John W. O'Reilly.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 19:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirects at Democrats for Life

I just thought I'd let you know that there are many double redirects that need to be fixed. I can do some of them. Thanks for working with me at that page. I appreciate your inputs and your willingness to reword things so that they're WP:NPOV. I'm looking forward to working with you in the future. Joie de Vivre 05:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

practical men

shows you how practical I am, time to log off and head home *yawn*, sorry for the bother.. --Isolani 17:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Supreme HQ.gif

Hi Briancua, I've seen the nice Image:Supreme HQ.gif that you've uploaded and wonder if it has a licence that would allow to upload it to the Commons. Have you taken this picture or where is it from? Thanks, Ibn Battuta 01:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd hate to black list this image because it doesn't have any source information. Could you please add the missing information? Thanks. --Ibn Battuta 07:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David L. Paterson

We need a reference for

"He was graduated from The Catholic University of America in 1989 with a BA."

Paterson's father was/is a Presbyterian minister. No reason not to go to The Catholic University of America but does need a citation. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 05:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I found the reference! [3] Thank you for the info. It helps the bio/profile quite a bit. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 05:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LittleMaroonStar1.png

Thanks for uploading Image:LittleMaroonStar1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Tim Murray.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tim Murray.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Chowbok ☠ 03:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Bishop_Lori.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Bishop_Lori.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lawrence G. Costanzo

Lawrence G. Costanzo, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Lawrence G. Costanzo satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence G. Costanzo and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Lawrence G. Costanzo during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Freedomeagle 22:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: History of The Catholic University of America

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as History of The Catholic University of America, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://tour.cua.edu/heritage/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:History of The Catholic University of America and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:History of The Catholic University of America with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:History of The Catholic University of America.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:History of The Catholic University of America/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:History of The Catholic University of America saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! P.Haney 23:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apologies then. I didn’t know that you had gotten permission from the authors at the time, so I tagged it because it looked very similar. It might be nice if you got someone to add the things that are suggested here. Again, I’m sorry about tagging the article. P.Haney 18:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Carl_Anderson.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Carl_Anderson.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KofC_WYD.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KofC_WYD.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CUA Cardinal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CUA Cardinal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dedham flag.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Dedham flag.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:CUA Aerial.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:CUA Aerial.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 03:37, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

Hello Slugger O'Toole/Archive 1!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 06:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MyDedhambanner1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MyDedhambanner1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 19:34, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Knights of Columbus

I have nominated Knights of Columbus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKiernan (talk) 08:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Briancua, one of the reasons give for FAR is that pictures you provided do not have a source listed. Is it possible to correct this before it becomes a reason for delisting? Marauder40 (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of graduate programs at The Catholic University of America

I have nominated List of graduate programs at The Catholic University of America, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of graduate programs at The Catholic University of America. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Madcoverboy (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Briancua! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 35 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Lawrence G. Costanzo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Paul R. Devin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Dennis Savoie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert J. Lane - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jean Migneault - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Patrick Fahey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Regis J. Armstrong - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
William J. Byron - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Catholic social teaching

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Catholic social teaching/GA1. I have placed the article on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Alveda King.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alveda King.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Catholic University of America and The Knights of Columbus for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article The Catholic University of America and The Knights of Columbus, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Catholic University of America and The Knights of Columbus until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John W. O'Reilly

The article John W. O'Reilly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nonnotable person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 02:32, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

File permission problem with File:Flather hall.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Flather hall.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 04:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]