User talk:Slgsx

July 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Above the Rim (soundtrack), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 03:56, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to American Soul. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adakiko (talk) 03:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Ja Rule. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Throast (talk | contribs) 13:39, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meet the Woo 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 04:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at DaBaby, you may be blocked from editing. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Lil Zane. InvadingInvader (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

47.40.45.254 has added back the edits reverted by Liz. Jay

02:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Grant (rapper) (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Grant (rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slgsx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 02:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Comments: sigJezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slgsx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for removing content with explaining. Next time I will explain my edits use the edit summary.

Decline reason:

I'm guessing you're User:Fhones et al.? If not, you can appeal via WP:UTRS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. There is at least one account and IP range that are blocked to prevent your from editing; your use of this account is block evasion.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just as an FYI, threats of harm pretty much make you ineligible for the standard offer. Your talk page access is revoked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@NinjaRobotPirate: I didn't see it. Maybe my glasses are not strong enough. meh. Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They're on the same IP range. There's more evidence on Simple English Wiki, if you need it. See simple:special:permalink/8366287#Sinlu22. I don't usually bother to document the steps necessary to come to the conclusions I reach. I got docked points for that in my calculus exams. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61366

is closed. Between CU evidence I cannot see and other information, endorse block. Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW-- https://sigma.toolforge.org/editorinteract.py?users=Interclipz&users=Slgsx&users=47.40.45.254&users=Chosewisely&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]