User talk:SlayerXT

Welcome!

Hello, SlayerXT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

March 2008 Butthole surfers edit

Regarding your edit sometime in March on the Butthole surfers. You say they were not Hardcore punk in their early days correct? I noticed you deleted that little tidbit that was thrown in there.I think you should really hear the stuff they made in their first first years. Just listen to the 1982 demos and tell me those werent pure hardcore. If you can find them.And if not hardcore, explain to me, what genres would the songs "Hate my Job" and "Suicide" go under?

regards.

Unfamous13 (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dignity (album)

Hi. Regarding your edits to Dignity (album): in accordance with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags), flag icons should not replace country names in single and album article infoboxes—they are meant to help the reader rather than decorate, and removing the country name will prevent the reader from learning quickly what country each flag is representing. Also, Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums states that only the earliest known date that an album was released should be specified in the infobox, with additional dates listed in a "Release history" section in the article. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Once Bitten (album) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 18:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons in info boxes

Hi, nice work, but just a note that per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags)#Summary, point 4:

"Flag images, especially flag icons in biographical infoboxes, should not be used to indicate birth or death places, as this may imply an incorrect citizenship or nationality."

I think they're not for use in band info boxes either, but I'm not certain, so I've left a note for someone who will know at User talk:John#Flag in band info boxes. Tyrenius (talk) 16:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your good work, SlayerXT. The MoS is ambiguous about flags in band infoboxes but there is a project consensus not to use them this way. There is no extra information in

United States that is not in United States. Best wishes, --John (talk) 16:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The thing to remember is that as an encyclopedia for adults, we mainly rely on text to get information across. We also need to cater for people with low bandwidth, disabilities etc. Another problem is that of over-emphasising nationality, which using the flag will do. In general, we don't use things just because (in some people's opinion) they make the article look nicer. See also WP:PRETTY. Best wishes, --John (talk) 16:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your consideration. Let me know if you need help with anything in the future. --John (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Template:Infobox_Musical_artist#Origin before adding any more flagicons to band infoboxes like you did to Betzefer. Aspects (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This time read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (flags)#Not for use in locations of birth and death before you add any more more flagicons to biographical infoboxes like you did to Dan Andriano. Aspects (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Handy hint

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a [[timestamp] when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Tyrenius (talk) 17:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to referencing

Click on "show" to open contents.

Notability of Burning Organ (band)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Burning Organ (band), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Burning Organ (band) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Burning Organ (band), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Doug aldrich.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Doug aldrich.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Talent genre

I have reverted your edits to Billy Talent's genre again. We should wait until some strong consensus is reached, and base it on verifiable sources, so we can avert any edit wars. Please be patient! One of the good article criteria requires an article to be stable and not subject to an ongoing edit war, and we need try to resolve and preserve that. Thank you. -- Reaper X 04:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Whitesnake.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Whitesnake.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jonathan Gallant.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jonathan Gallant.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aaron Solowoniuk.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aaron Solowoniuk.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Duff mcKagan.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Duff mcKagan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Good Charlotte has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 22:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of House of Lords (band)

An article that you have been involved in editing, House of Lords (band), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Lords (band). Thank you. --Explodicle (talk) 15:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Duff_mcKagan.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Duff_mcKagan.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Good to be Bad. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 00:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Do not add flags to artist infoboxes (See: WP:MOSFLAG. Also do not wikilink years any musician or album infoboxes. By the template rules unless a year has a specific month and day along with it... it doesn't get linked. Also, music labels use "piped" links. Example [[Mercury Records]] would be [[Mercury Records|Mercury]]. Read WP:ALBUM for all the guidelines regarding album infoboxes. Some of you edits are passable. But most undo the rules set down by WP:ALBUM. Example for genres only the first word in the first genre is capitalised. Any second/third genres must be lowercase. And all field entries are seperated by commas and not coded breaks. The guidelines for musician boxes specify all field use commas except genres which do not have a written specification. The consensus for the genre field is commas and to be consistent with the rules in place at WP:ALBUM genres, especially if there are more than 2, should be seperated by commas. If there are only 2 genres in place it doesn't really matter. If commas were there then leave them there. If a coded break was there it is OK to leave it alone. Please read all these rules and understand them so that all your edits don't have to be corrected... or in many cases... reverted completely. It's a shame to put effort into doing something when your contributions are just going to be reverted. If you read and follow the rules your edits will be allowed to stay. 156.34.222.121 (talk) 13:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Scream (Tokio Hotel album). Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AngelOfSadness talk 14:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images, however, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reason, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. Please note that we take very seriously our criteria on non-free image uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 17:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Motley crue b.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Motley crue b.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jacoby shaddix 02.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jacoby shaddix 02.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Josh todd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Josh todd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hi,

Thanks for improving the articles about Israeli bands!

Can you please write an edit summary when you edit articles? You never write it and i see that you have been already asked to do it. It is much easier to follow Wikipedia when editors provide an edit summary. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nail Within

A tag has been placed on Nail Within requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BigDunc^Talk 14:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Nail Within. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. BigDunc^Talk 18:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Nail Within, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. BigDunc^Talk 18:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nail Within

A tag has been placed on Nail Within, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BigDunc^Talk 22:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nail Within

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nail Within, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BigDunc^Talk 08:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sum41Demo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sum41Demo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Avital tamir.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Avital tamir.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? matt br 14:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The same message applies to Image:Matan cohen.jpg, Image:Daniel V.jpg, Image:Theyswarm.jpg, Image:Arafel.jpg, Image:Acropolis.jpg and Image:Ian Dsa.jpg. matt br 14:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As stated on the notice I placed on the images and in the message above, please do not remove it. To contest my tagging, please add: {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|Your reason why a free replacement can not be found or created}}. Thanks, matt br 19:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the notice I have placed on the images. If you dispute the tagging, please add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|Your reason why a free replacement can not be found or created}} to the image page. As non-free images of living people, they must adhere to the non-free content criteria. These images fail the first criterion "No free equivalent", as freely-licensed equivalents could be found or created. Please ask me on my talk page or at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions if you have any questions. matt br 14:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Fading

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Fading, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? tomasz. 13:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Theyswarm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Theyswarm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Yevgeni Shestak

A tag has been placed on Yevgeni Shestak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rosiestep (talk) 05:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

june 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Stone Temple Pilots, you will be blocked from editing. Wikiscribe (talk) 15:04, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit of The Fading

Hi, I saw you edited The Fading entry. Thanks for the fixes, but is there any reason for why did you changed the last name "Aranovič" to "Aranovich", and first name "Paul" to "Pavel", regarding to the band members? Boris (Nomæd) A. (talk) 09:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to you on my talk page, where you answered. By the way, I think there are a bit too many links that you added. Once for each name/topic is enough, IMHO. No idea what's the Wikipedia's official stand of the issue, but as I saw, same link rarely is used more than twice in a single article.

Boris (Nomæd) A. (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I supplied the page with a sufficient information, including links, and linking to the Wacken Metal Battle competition info, which must give more importance to the band. I guess when you open a page for a band, you need to give as much info and make sure that it's not just one of the thousands of new and irrelevant bands form daily.

Boris "Nomæd" Aranovič (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. --neon white talk 00:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nail Within

A tag has been placed on Nail Within requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BigDunc^Talk 15:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 10:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion of Phantom Pain (band)

A tag has been placed on Phantom Pain (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironho lds 01:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Matricide (band)

A tag has been placed on Matricide (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironho lds 04:12, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Fading - seriously, please stop editing!

Please stop editing The Fading band info.
Where the hell did you read that The Fading are signed by Metal Blade Records?!
I can't revert your changes every 2nd time...

Boris "Nomæd" Aranovič (talk) 14:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Travis Barker, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ŁittleÄlien¹⁸² (_talk\^contribs) 02:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Stop removing Rock from genre fields in music related articles. Rock is the parent genre of all the sub-styles of rock music including heavy metal, alternative rock, progressive rock.. etc. The field is not a sub-genre field. It is a genre field. Rock is the genre, the rest are just styles of rock. If you continue to remove the Rock genre link from articles where it is placed legitimately as a genre description, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Libs (talk) 14:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Libs (talk) 14:11, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anthem Metalfest

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Anthem Metalfest. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthem Metalfest. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sum41Demo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sum41Demo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Acropolis (band)

A tag has been placed on Acropolis (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 17:31, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Instructions for Self-Destruction.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Instructions for Self-Destruction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:24, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nail Within (album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nail Within (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Reference details go here

[1]