User talk:SlaveToTheWage/Archive 4

List of French castles

To: User:M-le-mot-dit, User:Kaustuv, User:SlaveToTheWage, Talk:List of castles in France#Organisation of this list, Wikipedia talk:France-related topics notice board#List of castles in France - request for suggestions

List of castles in France: I have looked at the users' suggestions and comments and have made a new draft that I think could be the way forward. It uses the basic format drafted by User:M-le-mot-dit and the sort of layour used in the French Wiki.

My proposal, with notes and explanation is at User:Emeraude/Castles2.

For information, other versions are:

List of castles in France - the present page
User:Emeraude/Castles - my first draft, grouped by dept.
User:M-le-mot-dit/draft - M-le-mot-dit's draft, grouped by region, then dept

What do you think? Emeraude 14:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Golubac fortress/General policy

Well, since you've targetted yourself for questions, here goes!

First off, there seem to be rather a lot of numbers for such a little bit of text based on the referencing I did for the article. Did I go overboard, and should just stick to numbers at the end of sentences, rather than also in the middle?

Also, I had a couple questions that I stuck on the talk page (except I imagine it's not a very high-traffic article, so who knows when it'll be seen). When sources disagree on dates, how is that usually dealt with?

In the process of finding sources and trying to figure out where the legend part should be, I also noticed that the majority of Golubac is taken word-for-word from the bottom of this page. What's done about things like that? Stick the site as a reference and note that it needs rewriting, or should it be deleted for copyright infringement, or? While deleting seems like the most likely, doing that would also turn the page into something completely useless.

Thanks! -Bbik 19:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thousand-Article Anglicisation

Hello STTW. I would like to ask you for your input in this - literally thousands of articles have been sloppily "Anglicised" already (changing "rÃ©gion" for "region", for example, without modifying the phrase around it in the least to provide the proper context/meaning of the term) without any prior discussion at all, and one is continuing this rampage in spite of an ongoing discussion and WP:RFC about it. As you are major contributor to France-topic articles, so your input in this case is even important. Please help. You can find the discussion here. Thanks. THEPROMENADER 19:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WPBiography project tagging (copied from here)

I came across STTWBot while {{WPBiography}} project tagging articles listed at DYK. Is it possible to modify STTWBot to assist me in tagging biography article talk pages with {{WPBiography}}? Thanks. -- Jreferee 16:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bot currently has approval for tagging WikiProject France and WikiProject Germany only. Any change has to be approved at Wikipedia:Bot requests first. So when if you can wait then I could request for an approval and help you out, should take perhaps a week or so. STTW (talk) 16:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my WPBiography tagging, I review the article for living, groups, etc, and then paste and then edit the following text according to my review of the article:{{WPBiography |living = yes no |class = |needs-infobox = yes |activepol = yes |a&e-work-group = yes |politician-work-group = yes |military-work-group = yes |sports-work-group = yes |s&a-work-group = yes |musician-work-group = yes |listas = |needs-photo = yes }} This string of text contains the most used WPBiography text and is useful for most articles. This may help you in configuring the bot. It would be nice to work with you on modifying the bot so I can get an idea of how bots are put together. -- Jreferee 17:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request made re WikiProject Spain

I've made the request for the bot described by you for WikiProject Spain. Just curious - how does the bot work? How can a bot know what's a Spain-related article or not? Plus, what happens next? How do we know if its approved? Full of curiosity -> EspanaViva 22:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot

Could you reprogramme your Wikiproject:France bot so it doesn't automatically add its project template to the top of the talk page above all other project templates? It's annoying for those of us in other projects who have created or worked hard on articles without any input from Project:France members to see those pages suddenly claimed for your project. By all means add your template if it's relevant, but put it after the existing project templates on the talk page please. Thanks. --Folantin 09:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into it. I have no problem with the Project France template appearing on any article relating to France, it's just the order of the templates that's a problem. Cheers. --Folantin 11:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of Talk:Swiss French

Hi, your bot tagged Talk:Swiss French as being within the scope of Wikiprojet France; of course, no one will mind if the participants come and improve the page, but I thought you may want to doublecheck if this page should really be tagged as such. Swiss French refer to the particularities of the French language as it is spoken in Switzerland; there is a clear connection with French, the language, but not so clear with France itself. Cheers, Schutz 12:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of Canadian articles

Hello. Your bot has been tagging articles related to Canada (mostly to Quebec) with the Wikiproject France tag. It is no more appropriate tagging these articles with the WF tag than it would be to tag United States with Wikiproject Britain. Could you please reverse the excessive and unnecessary tagging. Thanks. Skeezix1000 13:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

I regret I can't decipher your message: "There are many pages where this redirect was introduced by you today, could you also revert them." Revert what? If you are referring to the note about a redirect page left by User:Mikkalai on my Talk Page, I responded in full at the page he requested. If you or he disagree with me, by all means, please do a Wikipedia:Requests for comment.

P.S. â you should note User:Mikkalai warns not to leave messages on his Talk Page. However, his insulting a Wikipedia contributor is not only a violation of the Wikipedia:No personal attacks policy, but making unfounded assumptions as part of that attack is the conduct of an imbecile. --- Handicapper 16:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC) (MBA, CFA) [reply]

WikiProject France tags

I have undone a number of the WikiProject France tabs added to talk pages by STTWbot (talk). They seem to have been added indiscriminantly to pages that have nothing to do with France: for example, Canadian, Belgian, Swiss, Moroccan newspapers, pages on Canadian literature, Canadian schools, as well as pages dealing with the French language, but outside France. I have corrected over 50 pages already. Can you do something with your bot to correct this error? Thanks. â Grstain | Talk 14:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your message on my talk page:

"Thanks for informing me, I will have a look again at the categories being tagged and revert the wrong ones. You need not revert the edits, just let me know the category and I will remove the wrong tag. Sorry for that! STTW (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

please note that it seems that you were tagging pages with such categories as French language, French-language literature, French-language newspapers, French language schools and French-English translators, all categories which may or may not be connected with France. Thanks. â Grstain | Talk 12:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've removed the tag from Lâamour de loin for example - in spite of the title, this is a work by a Finnish composer. Could you please fix the problems with the bot before you let it proceed any further. It isn't very discriminating and it still isn't respecting the order of templates already on the talk pages. Thanks. --Folantin 14:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to say that I've removed the Wikiproject France tag which was (at the time, correctly!) added by the above Bot to the Talk page for I Lombardi alla prima crociata. I've hived off the detail about the considerably revised French version of the opera to JÃ©rusalem, a stub that I've just created, and I've inserted the tag on the Talk page of the latter. --GuillaumeTell 17:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not tag Air France-KLM. This is an international holding company that doesn't even have 50% French ownership. The bot has been tagging lots of pages of this nature, such as CFM International. Please stop. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 22:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In response to what feels like "inaccurate project france tagging" onto French-Belgian Project Comics articles, we did revert the first round of STTWbot actions (exclusively Belgian-related articles, shallow French connections) leaving be where there was a case for Project France interest, but now the bot has gone back and re-covered all its incorrect tracks. Any chance it can rectify this by itself, as it is boring and time-consuming to fix.. :( âMURGH ^disc. 05:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing, I will remove the wrongly tagged articles after manually going through the category. STTW (talk) 07:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France template - "importance"

STTW - is the "importance" section of the WikiProject France template working?-- NYArtsnWords 16:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The template is working, I corrected the error on Paris. Most probably that is why you contacted me. STTW (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually is was in relation to the History of France page, among others... I set the importance there to "top", but it remains categorized as "importance unassessed". Unlike other templates, I have yet to see any of the WikiProject France templates indicate "importance", only "quality". --NYArtsnWords 23:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in WP:F

My interest is prehistory until the end of the monarchy, then just New France. I am also interested in French culture, editing along those lines. Les Invisibles 02:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Your article request at Portal:Germany/Things you can do

Could you add an explanation what the article should be about at Wikipedia:WikiProject Germany/Article requests? Thank you, Kusma (è¨è«) 18:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yoko Tsuno

Hi SlaveToTheWage! STTWbot tagged some Yoko Tsuno related articles with Wikiproject France template, but Roger Leloup, the author, is belgian. Are you sure it is apropriated? FrÃ©dÃ©rick Lacasse 01:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I removed all the tags (for Yoko Tsuno albums I mean)FrÃ©dÃ©rick Lacasse 22:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hey, thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia! I have read a lot about what I'm supposed to do but I'm sure there's a lot more I should know (like how to sign). Question: some pages don't have any footnotes at all. That seems strange to me. Aren't articles supposed to have lots of independent references? Thanks again. Frankskey 21:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Stride logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stride logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

FAC

I noticed that you are a member of Biography wikiproject. Just in case you have time and interest in the topic (cinema):

I would like to have your comments on my work for further improvement. Any suggestion will be very much appreciated. Thanks. Sangak 18:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also wrote a section on the presence of Iranians in French New Wave. Might be of interest to you. (?) cheers. Sangak 18:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 27 February, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Villeneuve-sur-Yonne, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Yomangani ^talk 22:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot and WP:Portugal

Hi there,

I've noticed that your bot helps out with WikiProjects France and Germany. Is it possible that it would also help WP:Portugal? Would you set it to do it, then? I believe it would be really helpful.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (please join WP:Portugal or WP:SPOKEN) 16:13, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty much the guy leading the project, so if that counts for anything just tell me what I need to do to help you get the approval. I'm not an admin, though, which isn't surprising since no one ever thought I was worth even a barnstar.--Saoshyant ^{talk / contribs} (please join WP:Portugal or WP:SPOKEN) 16:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Germany tagging

Thank you for your work with the stub categories! If you have good suggestions how we can organize the rest of the tagging work, I'd love to hear them (as I don't trust the category system, I'm tagging in a semi-automated way with my AWB account Kusma using AWB when I get around to it, but don't think we should tag several subcategories deep - this has resulted in lots of annyoances and trouble with other project tags). Are there any stub categories left or have you done all of them? Kusma (è¨è«) 16:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to do the tagging slowly and partly by hand, as that means I manage to get an "importance" parameter in when I have heard of the article's subject every now and then. Perhaps we should generate a category list and then have people tackle some parts of it? If you can create a category list, we could work from that. Probably the best place to discuss is the project's talk page, though :-) Happy editing, Kusma (è¨è«) 17:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Eastern Germany

Perhaps you'd be interested in this:Talk:Historical_Eastern_Germany#Requested_move. -- HrÃ¶dberÃ¤ht (gesprÃ¤ch) 05:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adrianna Lamalle

It was an honest mistake I made when rating the article for the Biography Wikiproject. I've now re-inserting the France tag to the page, and please accept my humble apologies. LuciferMorgan 21:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images and infoboxes

Hi! I'm slightly confused about what I've done wrong with wiki markup for one or the other of those. I added the city infobox to KutnÃ¡ Hora yesterday, but the picture that was supposed to be at the start of the "Architecture" section, on the left, won't show until the very bottom of the infobox. I'm too impatient to wait for someone to come along and notice/fix it, so... Why's it doing that? I didn't notice any issues or special markup on other city pages that I checked when I tried to fix the problem, any idea what's wrong? Thanks, -Bbik 04:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 7 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article LadurÃ©e, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 15:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BarnabÃ© Brisson on DYK for 8 March 2007

Did you know? was updated. On 8 March, 2007, a fact from the article BarnabÃ© Brisson, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thank you for the nomination! — ERcheck (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

France Inter

See Wikipedia:Template substitution. The radio stations project template is a textbook example of the kind of template that should be substituted rather than called. Bearcat 17:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those took place long before Wikipedia began to encourage substitution for templates. The way it was explained to me, server load can become an issue if templates are always called rather than substituted. Also, I don't particularly see what kind of expansion is likely on the radio station template. Bearcat 22:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STTWbot

Hi Mets501! There seems to be some mistake perhaps from my side) as I wanted to request a 2nd task for my already existing bot, STTWbot and not a new bot (STTWbot 2). Which is shown in Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Bots_in_a_trial_period. Could you please correct it? STTW (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, that was my fault :-) I've fixed it. âMETS501 (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:House of Bourbon

You may be interested in the discussion.

--Malaiya 02:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 12 March, 2007, a fact from the article Gavroche, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 14:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GÃ©raud RÃ©veilhac

Hello,

I saw you red the uppon article, I would like to thank you for correcting the text, my english is sometimes a bit hesitant. Kind regards. SalomonCeb 19:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

I put in the article all the informations I found concerning General RÃ©veilhac. If you found some infromation in french, could you please give me the links or references and I'll translate it for you. Kind regards. SalomonCeb 21:48, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message, I answered to Rigadoon on his talk page: User talk:Rigadoun#GÃ©raud RÃ©veilhac. SalomonCeb 20:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 17 March, 2007, a fact from the article GÃ©raud RÃ©veilhac , which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NEMA connector

You changed [[USA]] to [[United States|USA]]. Note that you don't really need to do that; see Wikipedia:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken, where it says:

In particular, there should never be a need to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]]. That is, there should be no need to replace a redirect with a piped link to the target if the description is exactly the same as the redirect title.

Some editors have the mistaken impression that fixing redirected links improves the capacity of the Wikipedia servers. Because editing a page uses much more resources than following a redirect, the opposite is true. It is inadvisable to worry about performance anyway.

Personally, I'd think that if following redirects was expensive, the MediaWiki developers would optimize it so that it wasn't expensive any more. I don't think there's any real reason why it needs to be expensive.

Jordan Brown 06:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. STTW (talk) 07:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Le Secq

On 27 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henri Le Secq, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 19:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ChrÃ©tien-Louis-Joseph de Guignes

On 9 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article ChrÃ©tien-Louis-Joseph de Guignes, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 16:07, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indian collaboration of the week news

As mentioned in Wikiproject India newsletter of March 2007, the weekly collaboration of the Indian wikiproject has fallen from its once high feats. This message is to request the users to visit the collaboration page and help rejuvenate it.

The present collaboration of the week is Religion in India. Please go through the talk page of the article to see the proposed changes in the article. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ashok_Leyland.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashok_Leyland.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've signed up

Hello, thanks for your invitation to join the France WikiProject, I decided to sign up. Is there some sort of newsletter? I would much prefer not to receive one because of the size of such things. I prefer to get just a link if at all possible. I can't promise to dedicate myself solely towards the project, but I'd be more than willing to help on a casual basis. Thanks again for the invitation! --Kyoko 23:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you

Thank you for the Branstar. Much appreciated. Emeraude 10:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, it's my first barnstar. It's pleasant to see that our contributions are well accepted. Regards, â M-le-mot-dit (d) 17:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

May 2007 edition of the WikiProject Germany newsletter

The Germany WikiProject Newsletter
Issue I - May 2007

From the editor

This is the first issue of WikiProject Germany's newsletter. The newsletter is intended to help all members of the project to keep up with new developments and coordinate new collaborative efforts.

Other areas where you can help

Assessment requests: Some open Requests for assessment need to be answered. To see new assessment requests as they come in, you can watchlist the assessment page.
More task forces and subprojects: As this WikiProject covers a very large topic area, it is helpful to add more task forces that focus on specific aspects of Germany. Currently, we have a Mainz task force, a Munich subproject and some joint task forces with other WikiProjects. Any project member is invited to start a new task force. Suggestions for possible topics:
- Transportation in Germany
- German politics (the political system of Germany and the biographies of its politicians)
- German Democratic Republic

Be creative! If you have an idea, just suggest it on the project talk page (don't forget to watchlist it).

Categorization: Uncategorized Germany stubs need to be categorized

Project news

Criteria for B-Class status: The assessment criteria for B-Class have been changed. {{WikiProject Germany}} template now has 5 switches, B-Class-1 through B-Class-5 that correspond to 5 easily checked criteria that an article should meet to be assessed as B-Class. The advantage of this system is that now there is a clear boundary between Start-Class and B-Class articles. Authors of articles that were assessed as Start-Class now get more direct feedback what they should improve to attain a B-Class rating.

All of our B-Class, Start-Class and Stub-Class articles now need to be checked whether they meet any of the B-Class criteria. This is a major effort, and we need your help! If you want to help, but don't know how, please post at the project talkpage.

Cities and municipalities task force

A task force dedicated to creating and improving articles on all German cities and municipalities has been started and is looking for help.

This newsletter was delivered by Kusma using AWB to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, Kusma 12:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:BRFA

Hi! I wanted to remind you about your active BRFA, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/STTWbot 2, that will probably end up expired in a week or so if you don't give us an update. If you no longer need the bot, you can put {{BotWithdrawn}} there and we will close it for you. Thanks! ST47Talk 00:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Re:Indian stamps

Replied to you here. Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 24 May, 2007, a fact from the article SS Paris, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Smee 08:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Kalam

My apologies for any inconvenience caused. have a good day.--219.94.117.93 13:53, 29 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Gemology

Hi there, I am sorry for not responding before, last few months were insane ! I have recently (this month) started to do some serious editing on the gemstone pages.. and had a look at your google groups as well. Would you have some time to work on the gemology pages ?

Gem-fanat 21:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

CaÃ±a que que

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article CaÃ±a que que, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.150.205.106 00:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been expired. Please see the request page for details. âMETS501 (talk) 03:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP: France Newsletter

I noticed that you created a potential format for a WikiProject France newsletter. I was just wondering if anything was going to come of it; it seems like a large enough and active enough WikiProject to have a newsletter, so I was curious as to whether or not it did at one point and stumbled into your outline. Just curious. Thanks - matt91486 15:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply. I'd be more than happy to help, but I admittedly am unsure of the processes by which newsletter work is done. Just let me know what in particular should be worked on and I'll lend a hand where I can. matt91486 22:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

jsut got your message

i'm up let's do it i'm willing to help the wikiproject france! let me know Abdelkweli 19:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Diorama (band) article

I've noticed that the English version of the article considering the German band "Diorama" is rather poor, so I would like to contribute. Since your bot made the last edit, I was compelled to ask you for permission to make the changes. Respectfully,Withered Fairy 18:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks :)

Thank you for the warm welcome and the information you provided. I've already made the edit and hopefully, it is more presentable than the one before. Nice to be a part of the team! Withered Fairy 12:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Henry Corbin

On 5 January 2007 you requested that the Henry Corbin article be wikified. I believe that that has been done by others, so today I removed the wikification sticker. Please fell free to make other suggestions on the talk page. Thanks for calling this page to our collective attention. --Bejnar 21:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have linked some of the redink terms to appropriate Wikipedia articles, I have unlinked titles to books that in all likelihood will never have articles. Some of the names remaining as redink probably ought to have at least short articles. I have placed a "needs footnotes" box on top of the article. I only got about 2/3 done when the philosophy got to me. Maybe next week I'll take another look. --Bejnar 19:49, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AndhraBank logo.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:AndhraBank logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:Apollo logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Apollo logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bhel logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bhel logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 17:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:BombayDyeing.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BombayDyeing.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:BPCL logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BPCL logo.gif. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image source problem with Image:BPL logo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BPL logo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GautierBook.png

Thanks for uploading Image:GautierBook.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HM-LOGO.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:HM-LOGO.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WikiProject Newsletter n°1

Bonjour and welcome to the first WikiProject France newsletter!! It should become a monthly special of our project, but until the next issue, here are some points to consider for the month:

In an effort to determine the active members from the inactive, all members are asked to simply sign on my special userpage.
I have slightly rearranged and updated the Project page, putting all the featured lists in collapsible tables. This unclutteres the page and you only have to see them if you want to. Give your feelings at the talk page.
I have made a Wikipedia advert for our project, Image:Qxz-ad108.gif, what do you think? Personally I feel the words need improving ...
There are still map problems at Template:French commune - any help at resolving them would be greatly appreciated.
What about starting a monthly drive? We currently have no Featured Portals (except for the Basque Portal which really isn't French any way), so how about improving Portal:France??? I don't know what's exactly wrong but the criteria can be seen at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria.

It doesn't seem like a lot, so I hope we will still have enough problems for nexts months issue. Salut till the next issue, Chris DHDR (17:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Music Today

Hi. I came upon the Music Today article which you created. But I'm not sure what it is about. I can't find information on that magazine. There is an Indian online music magazine - but the article doesn't appear to be about that - [1]. Is it this one - [2]? BuildControl (talk) 12:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have at look at the version which I made here [3]. Since then the quality and content of the article has changed considerably!! The article definitely needs a clean-up. --STTW (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Solon SE

A tag has been placed on Solon SE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 16:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is a company listed on the TecDAX and ÖkoDAX, perhaps that makes it notable. --STTW (talk) 16:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Solon SE

Hi. Sorry, perhaps my tagging was a little hasty, however, I still tend to agree with my initial assessment. The article as it stands, is extremely short, providing little context. It is totally unreferenced, with no reliable third-party sources to establish any notability. While I daresay being part of the organisation you mention (I don't really understand economics!) does make it likely that it is notable, firstly, notability is not inherited from membership, and secondly, the article does not cite any sources asserting such notability.

Generally, it needs significant touching up, and I'm happy to remove the CSD tag if you wish to make changes along the lines above! Cheers, ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 16:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, wikipedia also needs hasty editors. Thanks for removing the CSD tag, happy editing. --STTW (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:ONGC Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ONGC Logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --STTW (talk) 16:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Remarkable Gardens of France

STTW, Thank you for your note. I enjoyed going thru the article on the Remarkable Gardens of France. I agree that when it gets too long, an article tends to be difficult to read, one reason being that other editors may decide to add to one section & the whole article becomes out of balance. The idea of making it on the model of the List of castles in France is excellent, and that could be the start of a collection using the same type of map, for food, climate, (wild) plants & animals etc. (which may already exist). All I can do to help is go thru texts, correct French & details when I fall upon something I know. I have put the article on my watch list. Aurevoir! Frania W. (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on my talk page

Thank you for welcoming me ! I don't intend to be here a lot : I'm a fr: wikipedian and I edit en:WP mainly for interwikis. Bye ! --Edhral 21:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your message about WikiProject France. I don't think I will be here enough for a real participation in that project. But if you need a clue one day or another from a French people, I might help you if you warn me on my talk page (or -- it would be better -- on my fr: talk page). --Edhral 18:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shaker Verlag

A tag has been placed on Shaker Verlag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan2 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is already deleted ... no time for me to react?? --STTW (talk) 08:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I userfied the article to User:SlaveToTheWage/Shaker Verlag so you can work on it and show notability before we can move it back to mainspace. Agathoclea (talk) 21:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot for WikiProject Egypt

Could u please make a bot for adding the {{WikiProject Egypt}} templates to the talk pages of Egypt related articles that are in Category:Egypt and it's subcategories. I have done more than a hundred yesterday which took me a lot of time and it would require a lot more if I continue to do them manually. Please consider doing them like your bot for WikiProject France and WikiProject Germany. It would save me a lot of time and would make WikiProject Egypt a lot better. Currently I'm instead of improving Articles I'm adding templates, which is time consuming and unrelated to the encycolopedic entries. Please help. Just a template saying that the article is there but unnaccessed or like the bot for WikiProject France it cheks for other quality and importance scales. your help is greatly appreciated and will be noted on the WikiProject Egypt main Page.

Thanks a lot. --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 10:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which categories should be included? --STTW (talk) 17:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for earlier, I wikilinked the Categories name. Is it possible to make it for all connected to Category:Egypt ?--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 18:53, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sambot has already taken care of it. Thanks though.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 09:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP GER tagging

I noticed your bot is tagging for WP Germany. Would it be possible to piggyback tagging for Munich onto it. If the bot recognizes a Munich related article when tagging for Germany he would add |Munich=yes|MunichImp=}}? Agathoclea (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Let me know that categories which you want to include? --STTW (talk) 11:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Munich would do the trick. A bit more complex heuristic would be to recognize articles that have Munich mentioned in their lead at the time of tagging them for WP Ger. Agathoclea (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. One edit did not recognize that it was already tagged as it was a multiline template. Don't worry if it can't be fixed as I need to rate importance of all anyway, but you might want to get it done for similar runs later. (PS is it possible to add importance= to those where it is missing - only if you touch it anyway)? Agathoclea (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Fixed the regex typo. --STTW (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you remember what you tried to achieve here? Obviously you were not looking at the article in question but possibly at another template which you wanted to tag at the time. Maybe you did that anyway or maybe that edit is missing. Agathoclea (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC) Found it! - Agathoclea (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops ... thanks for correcting it. --STTW (talk) 16:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:WirtschaftsBlatt-Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:WirtschaftsBlatt-Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

How difficult would it be for your bot to spit out a list of all articles that are in Category:All unreferenced BLPs and are tagged for WP:Germany? Agathoclea (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes should be possible, what needs to be done with the list of articles? --STTW (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment there is a drive to delete unreferenced BLP. A lot of the older articles can be sourced quite trivially, but then again a non-German speaker might have problems understanding the German google results. So I'd rather we as a project give the list a once-over rather a combination of robot like taggers and deleters. Agathoclea (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The other point would be that if articles do get deleted the redlinks in that list will give an indication to go back and check at a later date to reinstate the articles with sources. Agathoclea (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old username

Just wondering, your old usernames talk page and archives are currently orphaned, do you have any objection to moving them to your userspace, and rejigging your archives to fit them in. Thanks--Jac16888 ^Talk 14:59, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is also at least one image at commons referring to you old username as the original uploader. Agathoclea (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you could move them to my Archive 1 as long as I have nothing to do with my old username --STTW (talk) 17:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, done. Thanks. Created two new archives and moved these ones forward as there was a fair amount of content--Jac16888 ^Talk 17:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ah sorry, forgot to fix those names--Jac16888 ^Talk 17:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Villeroy & Boch logo.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Villeroy & Boch logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]