User talk:Slasher405

Reuben Foster edit

Do you have a citation for the middle name of Rueben Foster being Burdon? I cannot find that information anywhere else and would like to verify authenticity.

Someone has removed the middle name. Calibus78 (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slasher405, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Slasher405! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@HostBot: No thanks. No tea for me. But I'm glad you gave out an invitation. Slasher405 (talk) 22:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Jonnu Smith

Hello, Slasher405,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Jonnu Smith should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonnu Smith .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mduvekot (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert; ledes

Per wp:lede, your addition was not appropriate. --2604:2000:E016:A700:4817:7C35:95FE:6A92 (talk) 21:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the previous reversion. It could be considered point-blanking, and that could also be inappropriate. Slasher405 (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what you are trying to say. The material moved from the lede to the body did not belong in the lede. Per wp:lede. But you keep restoring it. Without an understandable explanation. I've linked to wp:lede for you. --2604:2000:E016:A700:4817:7C35:95FE:6A92 (talk) 21:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And now, you just after this discussion, and after edit warring, gave me a warning? This makes no sense. I quoted wp:lede to you. 2604:2000:E016:A700:4817:7C35:95FE:6A92 (talk) 21:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just started a discussion at ANI. Slasher405 (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Given the input from other editors in this ANI discussion, I will revert. Nobody else seems to understand your rationale, or accept it, and I above gave you my rationale. I agree with the other comments at ANI (except for the one asking why neither of us opened up talk page discussion - as you pointed out, I did). 2604:2000:E016:A700:584:4549:565B:AFCB (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As for your request, we will reach an agreement, so the added content at the beginning of the article will no longer be put up. Slasher405 (talk) 16:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NFL Draft

There's no need to add the date the player was drafted. The round and draft selection is good enough--Yankees10 15:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me. Slasher405 (talk) 15:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Kimberley Garner, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Please read WP:BLPSOURCE Scr★pIron^IV 18:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ScrapIronIV: If you check out the link to her profile at IMDB, it shows proof of her birth date. Slasher405 (talk) 18:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is not a reliable source for biographical information. Scr★pIron^IV 18:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing more to worry. I will not put any repeated info back. Slasher405 (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, it takes a while to get accustomed to all the special little ways Wikipedia has of doing things. My first year was quite rocky. It will start to come naturally come in time. :-) Scr★pIron^IV 19:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your WP:ANEW report

Hi Slasher405. Thanks for helping out. In this case, it would have been better to use increasing levels of the uw-unsourced warning template (see Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings/Usage and layout for more info) after each edit and then reporting to WP:AIV after the final-level warning. Also, a new editor has to be warned about WP:3RR and reverted after the warning before they can be reported to WP:ANEW. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis Samuel contract

You posted Sterling Shepard's contract on Curtis Samuel's Wikipedia page. Your reference said Samuel may receive a similar contract, but that does not mean you post Shepard's contract numbers on Samuel's page. Its wrong and very misleading to users who do not check your reference. Toeknee44 (talk) 00:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zack Greinke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might be exposed...

Just a simple copy-and-paste nonsense pool here. No need to debate any further from here. Slasher405 (talk) 20:24, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

There is currently a discussion on the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents, regarding an issue where you may be involved. Slasher405 (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exposed? Am I hiding something? Akocsg (talk) 01:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have nothing to hide. You performed forgery of another user's signature. I'm turning you in for this. Slasher405 (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? What signature? Akocsg (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My signature of course. You not only imitated a previous message that I left on your talk page, but you put my signature in instead of yours. I don't think it's right to just copy a previously message on your talk page, and put it in the one who gave you the message. You have to be more careful. Slasher405 (talk) 01:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what the issue is mate. All I did was answer your message and put it also in your talk page, so you notice it. What's the problem with this? Akocsg (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom line is, at first, you copied a message that I put on your talk page, and put it on my talk page, with my signature instead of yours. That really is not allowed. I'm no admin or any sort of op, but, you still could get in trouble just for posting something that copies or imitates another message, even if it has someone else's signature. Slasher405 (talk) 01:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't get what the problem is about that, but ok, I won't do it again. So please delete that message on both noticeboards, because as they are now they are misleading. Regards, Akocsg (talk) 01:30, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please reconsider your message on that admins noticeboard? It's really misleading this way. I'm not doing "foul play", if you would check my edit history. And this forgery thing is obviously just a misunderstanding. It was a common practice to just copy text to the other users' talk pages. Many other users also do this. I didn't intend to "imitate" or something.

And btw, in the edit-warring noticeboard that IP account is obviously doing some witch hunt based on personal reasons, since there is no edit-warring going on in that article. Regards, Akocsg (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Slasher405. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kearse

Mistake.--Yankees10 22:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, it's all right. We all make mistakes. It was a good edit, and that's all that matters. You have been quite a veteran on Wikipedia, knowing a lot about football and baseball. Every editor has a right to voluntarily help out and type up what exactly what was true in the past games. In the meantime, just about every edit has to cite a reliable source and reference in the aftermath, so it reflects on those events properly. Slasher405 (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Plot tags

Please be more careful. In at least one case you removed a Plot tag claiming the summary looked like it was between 400-700 words, when it was over 800 words. It should be easy enough to get a word count before de-tagging, but please let me know if you need assistance. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:09, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly reverted edit on John Boyega's Wiki

He wasn't born in Peckham, the other editor was correct in removing it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HuUnJHf6yk (4:00) —Lunaeria (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Rodgers

Aaron Rodgers doesn't play for the browns. Chadmccoy47 (talk) 14:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Lauren Shehadi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! BilCat (talk) 22:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SPI tags

Hi there I'm just wondering why are you messing with SPI tags after a clerk has dealt with them? Specifically here after a SPI clerk, Sir Sputnik tagged it and Ponyo positively confirmed via Checkuser that this is a sock? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At first, I saw that the block was only three months, and then there was confusion. I'm so sorry for all this misunderstanding, but thanks for your concerns. Slasher405 (talk) 21:33, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:33, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Edelman

I don't what went wrong, but you added a reference saying the title was Julian Edelman suspended 4 games. At least the article I can see has the headline Julian Edelman facing four-game suspension for PEDs. I don't know if the article at one point had that headline, but the actual reference URL itself, which you used, says ....article/julian-edelman-facing-fourgame-suspension-for-peds . If that was a deliberate replacement of the title with one you preferred, please don't do that, it creates confusion. Tarl N. (discuss) 01:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Slasher405. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Slasher405, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Meatsgains^(talk) 01:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Brandon Workman

Hi - please do not add "World Series Champion" to players who were not on a World Series roster, such as Brandon Workman in 2018. Such designation is specific to the players who were on a team's World Series roster, as listed in applicable Templates, such as Template:2018 Boston Red Sox. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 21:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit comment

On a recent edit, you said Removing unnecessary vandalism. I agree with the edit, but was quite amused by the comment - implying the existence of necessary vandalism.

For future reference, a better edit comment would have been "remove unnecessary defamatory statement". Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 03:30, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mick Thomson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Robert Trujillo. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:56, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Robert Trujillo. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the article in the Spanish Wikipedia. I don't know why you are leaving messages like this on my talk page space, but it seems that you're trying to bait me into a plethora of trouble. If you look at the full name of Trujillo on the Spanish Wikipedia article, you just might have my permission to post it on this English Wikipedia. But, if you still think it is libelous or violating the BLP policy, you could be on the wrong avenue anyhow. But I will let it go this time, so that we can avoid committing an edit war. Slasher405 (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jaws 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please be more careful with your edits. Your changes to this article introduced multiple grammar errors. DonIago (talk) 02:05, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Odell Beckham Jr., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 01:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sam Darnold, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The same applies to every other page that you edit. Please start adding sources, because your edits are disruptive as of now and other editors must clean up after you. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dashes

Hi, when you enter a score (ex: 14–7), use an endash instead of the dash on your computer. The endash (–) key is located just to the right of the insert thing at the bottom of the page.

Enter your dashes like this: 14–7. Not like this: 14-7

LaDanian1000000 (talk) 06:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

bruh u also need to put a source after your edits

Ex: During Week 15 against the Los Angeles Rams, Pollard finished with 131 rushing yards on 12 attempts, including a 44-yard touchdown as the Cowboys won 44–21.^[1]

LaDanian1000000 (talk) 06:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Cowboys render coin toss mix-up moot, throttle Rams 44-21". www.espn.com. December 15, 2019. Retrieved December 15, 2019.

A. J. Bouye

Hi, I started a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League#Pending_trades_and_signings regarding how to proceed with all of these official but maybe not official transactions. I pinged you, not sure if you saw. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jags said the Bouye trade is official, so no issues here now. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Just wanted to understand all this to avoid a public relations issue. You see, even those who don't know these transactions (and at what time it will occur) can be somewhat difficult on those who are part of WP:NFL. Bit nevertheless, there is now more understanding now. Thank you. Slasher405 (talk) 20:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rocky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pet shop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Some were unnecessary cosmetic changes that were counterproductive, and another had grammar issues. Several IP editors have also added the "impaled by a Triceratops skull" to the plot summary just as you did, but this has been discussed on talk and removed from the article multiple times. Discuss further on the article's talk page if needed. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 19:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging user pages

It's really not your place to be tagging socks, only the blocking admin or an SPI clerk/CU should be doing the tagging. Also tags such as this are incredibly unhelpful, because (a) the user isn't banned, and (b) it's bringing the troll the attention they crave. Some vandals revel in the idea of their userpages getting tagged; see WP:DENY, so all you're doing is giving them what they want. If a sock doesn't have a tag, that's almost always intentional. I know you mean well, but these tags are unhelpful and often inaccurate, and there are so many other ways you could be spending your time, so I suggest you give tagging userpages a rest. Sro23 (talk) 02:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, what Sro23 said. I came here from my watchlist entry for the page they linked to tell you the same thing. Please don't tag socks like this without a reason; as Sro23 said, it's almost always on purpose that they're not tagged. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 03:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just for reference, I've deleted all of the similar user pages you created for IP users; apart from the (still valid and relevant) concerns noted above, none had edits that were anywhere near recent enough to warrant tagging. None had edits more recent than two years ago (User:165.24.246.245), and one had edits that dated back to more than thirteen years ago (User:70.48.244.88). Please don't do this again. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 06:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Cowboys render coin toss mix-up moot, throttle Rams 44-21". www.espn.com. December 15, 2019. Retrieved December 15, 2019.

[1]