User talk:SkepticSalmon

Article protection

e your edit comments in Hassan Rouhani and 2017 Desert Diamond West Valley Phoenix Grand Prix . Please stop asking for article protection in edit summaries. If you want to ask for protection do it properly at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. And we don't protect articles just because they are new, or because they are about politicians. Meters (talk) 17:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2017 Desert Diamond West Valley Phoenix Grand Prix . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. And since your edits to both of these articles were vandalism, here's your warning. Meters (talk) 17:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, SkepticSalmon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 15:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

May 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Elias Beckingham, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

SkepticSalmon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18359 was submitted on May 23, 2017 22:05:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SkepticSalmon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

According to my block report, this is a sock-puppet account. This is not, in fact, a sock puppet account, as I am using it for legitimate editing, not anything malicious SkepticSalmon (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account was technically matched to several other accounts. You have to explain that is you want ti be unblocked. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you're saying you have used multiple accounts for legitimate purposes, please identify all the accounts you have used. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

SkepticSalmon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18396 was submitted on May 31, 2017 03:04:05. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]