User talk:Sirhewlett

December 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Bad Guys (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tube·of·Light 05:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They did nearly fall to their death and Foxington was a hypocrite. So wouldn't that actually be me adding facts? Sirhewlett (talk) 17:42, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding poorly sourced material

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Hoffstad (comedian) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Erik Hoffstad (comedian), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. Silikonz💬 19:06, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erik Hoffstad (comedian) (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Silikonz was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Erik Hoffstad (comedian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Silikonz💬 19:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sirhewlett! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Silikonz💬 19:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm WaterExplorer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vox Media, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WaterExplorer ^talk 20:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm Magical Golden Whip. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nickelodeon‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fandom can't be used as a source, since your edit has been reverted a few times already it maybe time to take it to the talk page. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MGW, Nickelodeon only brung back the splat logo for idents and Nick Productions only. Sirhewlett (talk) 22:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kesha. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flamin' Hot (brand) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Flamin' Hot (brand), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The article was written by "AI" per creator at TeaHouse and at least one fact is false as shown by LATimes

Slywriter (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

American Psycho (franchise) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to American Psycho (franchise). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 21:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you are using ChatGPT or a similar tool (large language model) to assist you in creating content. Are you aware of the associated risks? —Alalch E. 10:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

" There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Apache287 (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)"[reply]

The file File:Blue Peter's New Logo.webp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Incorrect format, has been replaced with image in correct format and been removed from only article where used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Apache287 (talk) 15:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalization or we will block. Apache287 (talk) 01:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, edit wars. Sirhewlett (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, you are repeatedly editing unsourced, conspiratorial material into this site repeatedly despite being told to stop several times by several people. If you do this again I will report you (and your IP that you also use) to the vandal incident board asking for a permanent block. Apache287 (talk) 01:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Peter's New Logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blue Peter's New Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 02:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Erik Hoffstad (comedian)

Hello, Sirhewlett. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erik Hoffstad (comedian), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Flamin' Hot (brand)

Hello, Sirhewlett. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Flamin' Hot (brand), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Erik Hoffstad (comedian)

Hello, Sirhewlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Erik Hoffstad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:22, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:American Psycho (franchise)

Hello, Sirhewlett. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American Psycho (franchise), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:American Psycho (franchise)

Hello, Sirhewlett. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Psycho".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]