User talk:Sirberus

Welcome

Hello Sirberus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for signing up. Here are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Best of luck. Have fun! --Electric Eye (talk) 02:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Resolving ambiguity (example:Welcome)
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Peer review

I have requested that the FSU article be peer reviewed to help ensure it meets the highest standards of Wikipedia.Sirberus 13:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for being unable to help with the overhaul as I have been extremely busy at work. I would like to congratulate you on doing such a wonderful job as I know that the reworking (especially the referencing) had to be a task of biblical proportions. To make it up to you I will give a much needed overhaul of the Spanish-language FSU entry in the future. ¿Esta bien? Mike850 00:40, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Florida State University GA Review

I will be happy to review Florida State University for GA status. Majoreditor 14:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post a note on my talk page once the article is nominated and I will start the review. Thanks. Majoreditor 14:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I selected the article and am beginning the review. Majoreditor 15:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is looking good; I will try to complete my review tomorrow. Majoreditor 02:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Florida State University has passed GA Review. The article has room for improvement -- see my comments on the talk page -- but has benefited from your many helpful contributions. Keep up the good work. Majoreditor 03:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Changes

I've been through FAC a couple times, so as soon as I saw the state of Florida State University, I went through it and fixed several, several problems. I have no idea how the article managed to get GA in the state it was in, but it's somewhat worthy of its rating now. It could still use some better prose, and certain sections need references. If you have any questions about the changes, leave me a message. Oh, by the way, I also categorized all FSU images I came across into Category:Florida State University. Ideally, all of the free ones will be moved to commons:Category:Florida State University at some point. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 22:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

I am curious about the discrepancies in UF and FSU founding dates. I have intimate knowledge of how and when these were changed by FSU as I was an employee of the school at the time and have spoken at length with TK Wetherall about the change. Additionally I have access to archived UF documents from 1905 which state the founding as 1853. How would one go about making these available and getting the appropriate dates changed.

Wikiproject FSU!

Invite

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Florida State University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Florida State University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Addbot (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jccort (talk) 19:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Narcomey

I was developing the article on David Narcomey and unfortunately you deleted it.

Narcomey is important as he is a central figure in the FSU American Indian controversy and is quoted a number of times in articles on the subject in Wikipedia.

I believe that someone so instrumental in a controversy should have some background information available (i.e. an article), especially one so in the forefront of a sensitive matter. Such material helps the reader establish the relevance of the person in the controversy which leads to better interpretation of the controversy. I plan to further develop the article with sourced materials.

Would you kindly undelete the article?Sirberus (talk) 21:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain which of the criteria at WP:BIO he meets? Please also note WP:BLP1E. Stifle (talk) 21:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you consider these criteria on WP:BIO I believe Narcomey is sufficiently notable to warrant an article in Wikipedia:

Basic criteria> Any biography > Narcomey has been mentioned in numerous articles as having made widely recognized contributions to his field, in this case to discrimination events concerning American Indians. He has been quoted multiple times in many articles on many different events, including the controversy at Florida State University. I can list the articles if you want, but a Google search produces a fair number of individual articles wherein Narcomey is mentioned and/or quoted. Narcomey is apparently held by the media at large to be a reliable source of information such that his coverage spans years, multiple media sources and events. Clearly, Narcomey is mentioned in many different articles that are independent of him, verifiable and reliable.

A weakness to my argument is that Narcomey has yet to be found to be the subject of a published writing, but I believe this may be overcome by the fact that without Narcomey and his remarks there would be little of interest in the matter covered that is the subject of the original writing. In other words Narcomey is apparently regarded by multiple, independent media writers to be intimately integral to the subject of discrimination and American Indians. To not include Narcomey in his own right would be like saying Malcolm X was unworthy of his own Wikipedia article during the time of his most active work in the area of race relations, simply because no one had yet put pen to paper and created the work. Sirberus (talk) 00:28, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A further thought is to simply make the page the page a stub for now. Sirberus (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and restore the article and AFD it. Stifle (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thanks. Sirberus (talk) 16:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 23:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Gainesville, Florida - in the planning stages, if you're interested. Yeah, I know, but it wouldn't be during a home-game weekend, if that'll help. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could this be used?

I recently went to the FSU Wake Forest game and was able to snap off a few shots. I'm not sure if this could be used in any of the FSU article but I figured your be the person to ask so do with it as you see fit.

FSU Guy (talk) 02:50, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow - nice work! Thanks for making it available. You might consider also posting your work on the FSU talk page.

Sirberus (talk) 02:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:FSU protest Tallahassee rc01458.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FSU protest Tallahassee rc01458.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:16, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:N LOGO.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:N LOGO.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pr20747.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pr20747.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 03:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment of Florida State University

I have done a GA Reassessment of the Florida State University article as part of the GA Sweeps project. My review is here. It is my opinion that the article does not meet the current GA Criteria. There are several dead links, areas of the article that need to be referenced, and a general tone to the article that does not appear neutral. I have placed the article on hold for a week and I am notifying you as the primary editor. Please contact me on my talk page should you have questions. H1nkles (talk) 21:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, I'll check back in a week and if you need more time then I can extend the hold. If you would like to discuss particulars of the review please list your thoughts on the article's talk page and I'll respond there. Thanks. H1nkles (talk) 01:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just checking in on this review, I don't see much work done yet. I can extend the hold if necessary. Please advise. H1nkles (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - Please do extend the hold. I have not been able to direct my energies to the work yet. Thank you for working with me, real life has a way of interfering with priorities on Wikipedia. :-) --Sirberus (talk) 13:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand completely, I'll push it out to the first of September and check back in then. H1nkles (talk) 21:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help re: FSU uniforms

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Florida_State_Seminoles_football#Uniform_Combinations There is debate about whether to show every possible combination of FSU uniforms or just the ones that have been used. Basically this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fsuunis.jpg versus this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ACC-Uniform-combination-FSU.PNG User Kevin W claims that he is seeking "uniformity" with other college football pages that show every possibly combination, without regard for their actual use. I disagree. Why show combinations that have not and will not be used? As a contributor to the page I am asking for more input and help as others are now agreeing with me but Kevin won't stop. Thanks. AriGold (talk) 20:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chem Bldg Picture: FSU Campus

The new chemistry building at FSU is not called Abele Building (filename of photo is misleading/incorrect). The official FSU abbreviation is CSL for Chemical Sciences Building. See e.g., http://www.chem.fsu.edu/featured-headliners.php?type=Department&status=1 . Agora2010 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks! --Sirberus (talk) 00:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject SUSF

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject State University System of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the State University System of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

NorwalkJames (talk) 21:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Albert A. Murphree statue on FSU campus

Sirberus, I wanted to compliment you on your recent photographic addition to the Albert A. Murphree article. I had been questing for a photograph of the Murphree statue on the FSU campus, but having been unable to find anything on any of the official FSU or other related websites I was beginning to doubt its existence. When you took the digital photo you added, did you take any images of the inscription, statue base or related plaque that provides details regarding the statue's origins, the artist or Murphree himself? I would love to add more details to the caption or a footnote . . . . Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. When I took the photograph I read the plaque at the base but found the inscription unremarkable. It provided the basics about Murphree but little else. When I next visit campus I'll look for artist or other originating information. --Sirberus (talk) 21:00, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I was on campus the other day and re-examined the Murphree statue. I did not find any information about the artist. The plaque provides some details about Murphree, but nothing we don't already know. --Sirberus (talk) 23:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Tbuf_rc01381.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tbuf_rc01381.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Tbuf_rc01386.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Tbuf_rc01386.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:N LOGO.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:N LOGO.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 06:40, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FSU Seal P CMYK.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FSU Seal P CMYK.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

Thank You for starting the wiki page on David Narcomey and thank you for fighting to keep the page from being deleted. He is an outstanding Indigenous activist and a very reliable friend and colleague. He has a long history with the American Indian Movement and is definitely worthy of a wiki article. I will do what I can, when I can to assist in improving the article. Chi Miigwech SheaSandy (talk) 01:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Sirberus (talk) 04:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:900 MHz (FSU).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:900 MHz (FSU).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 17:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Rhodes Scholars

Dear Messers Sirberus and Levineps,
If you care to examine the talk page history of this page, you will see that this discussion has been held before. You will see that you have, like I did, advocated the use of "notable" in the page name. However, I was "over-ruled". It will be interesting to see if you are.
FYI, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Fountain Landis0320 (012).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fountain Landis0320 (012).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:FSU MedSchool 0043 (067).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FSU MedSchool 0043 (067).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attacks

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Flagship and Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/U.S._Flagship_Universities. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. You were already warned about this on prior occasions by ElKevbo, Cuchullain, and myself. Thank you. 173.170.235.213 (talk) 11:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Knock this crap off. You aren't being attacked, but your references and representations are. I would also have much more good faith if you weren't using an anonymous IP as what appears to be a sockpuppet editor on a controversial article. Sirberus (talk) 11:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the proper response to a post about improper behavior (which you've been warned about by three separate editors) is to call the warning "crap", accuse me of being a sockpuppet, and state that the reason for your violation of WP:AGF is due to my being an IP editor (please read WP:HUMAN). Regardless, please remain civil and refrain from personal attacks in the future. Thank you. 173.170.235.213 (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see above for response. Sirberus (talk) 17:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on U.S. Flagship Universities

Hello, Sirberus! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about U.S. Flagship Universities.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/U.S. Flagship Universities. Huon (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flagship Reversions

Hello Sirberus - I saw that you recently reverted edits at Flagship due to an AfC being worked on elsewhere for a subsection of that subject matter. The AfC has no deadline and Wikipedia doesn't have restrictions against improving related pages during the weeks or months that the AfC is being drafted. Per WP:DRNC, please don't revert any edits that can be verified and would be an improvement to a page simply because you disagree with it. If it added unsourced or poorly-sourced information, try to find said information yourself, or failing that, note that in the revert summary. If it made the presentation of material awkward, edit to make the presentation less awkward. If it added a biased statement, try to find a way to recast it into a neutral mode. If it added instructions on how to do something, explain that Wikipedia is not a manual. If it removed content with no explanation or an unconvincing one, note that you are restoring valid content, and why the explanation is unconvincing (if the edit summary box is too small for this, continue on the talk page). Thank you. Eidolonic (talk) 13:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eidolonic, I really don't know why you and anonymous 173.170.235.213 want to push this contentious material so quickly forward. You are essentially asking for the AfC process to be ended and I don't think it is anywhere near ready yet. Further, I am not confining my work in this area to one subsection. This is now twice you two have short-circuited a resolution process set forward by an administrator and WP:DRNC isn't Wikipedia policy, by the way. I don't see what is gained by it as Wikipedia has no deadlines (See: WP:CHILL for more non-Wikipedia policy) and is operated on a consensus basis and by unpaid volunteers (like me). You seem to have a deadline and an agenda and I have to wonder if it has anything to do with the 2013 Florida Legislative Session which ends on May 2. But let's do it your way - we'll abandon the AfC process and I will note your request on the various talk pages. Sirberus (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This whole thing where you accuse anyone who argues with you of having an agenda is getting pretty old. How am I trying to push the AFC forward quickly / how do I seem to have a deadline? I voted with you AGAINST 173's request for the AFC to go live and said that the article wasn't ready. How have I "short-circuited a resolution process set forward by an administrator?" 173's edit to the flagship page added a few parts for both views and filled a gap in what was left. There was no reason to revert it, and that in no way signals my abandonment of the AFC process. Please be mature. And what's going on in Florida's legislative branch that has any bearing on this? Eidolonic (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dude - chill out. This is Wikipedia. Go see what I am writing in the flagship space. I think you'll like it. We can make this good - and stable. P.S. Please tell your bud to get a friggen user name. BTW - the Legislature passed the preeminent universities bill by a wide margin. Sirberus (talk) 18:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Sirberus! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:30, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to a Wicnic in Gainesville on Saturday, June 22nd

Greetings!

Seeing that once upon a time you requested notification should there ever be a Wikipedia Meetup in Gainesville, Florida, I'm inviting to the North Central Florida 2013 Great American Wiknic that will be on Saturday June 22, 2013, commencing at 1:00 pm, ten blocks north of UF campus.

If you're able and inclined to come, please RSVP at at this URL.

Type to you later, Vincent J. Lipsio (talk) 11:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florida State University, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Will and Estate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Asolo FSU Sarasota.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:26, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (emblem).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (emblem).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Color graphics for Infobox college football player

Sirberus, here's a sneak peel at how the revamped infobox is going: Template:Infobox college football player/testcases#Joe Cool (typical example). What do you think of the colors, graphics, and layout and design? In particular, how do you like the "college varsity stripe graphics?" Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks good! Thanks. Sirberus (talk) 11:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HeritageTower night 0142 (001).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HeritageTower night 0142 (001).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Mf0145.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mf0145.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rc01124.gif

A tag has been placed on File:Rc01124.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 12:09, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Symbol HeritageTower 0279 (048).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Symbol HeritageTower 0279 (048).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stadium 0279 (117).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stadium 0279 (117).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Westcott 8445.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Westcott 8445.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pc5917.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pc5917.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pr20747.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pr20747.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ringling pc5667.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ringling pc5667.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Strozier pc5919.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Strozier pc5919.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Westcott rc05025.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Westcott rc05025.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marching Chiefs rfc

Hey, I opened an rfc into an issue with the Marching Chiefs page. I was hoping you'd be willing to chime in.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sirberus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FSU & UF Founding Dates

Found this message buried in unrelated text:

I am curious about the discrepancies in UF and FSU founding dates. I have intimate knowledge of how and when these were changed by FSU as I was an employee of the school at the time and have spoken at length with TK Wetherall about the change. Additionally I have access to archived UF documents from 1905 which state the founding as 1853. How would one go about making these available and getting the appropriate dates changed.

I missed this question as it was buried in with other text. My apologies for my very slow response. I am curious as well and have been for years. Please note it wasn't President T.K. Wetherell that pushed for the FSU date change, it was President Sandy D'Alemberte. In my view, this date issue is a perfect example of Florida Politics - on the State and University level. I don't know why native Floridians get so worked up on this issue, but they do and have been doing so for well over 150 years. I think both FSU and UF share the same origin date of 1851 because they were both created by the same law, which has its origins in a Congressional plan articulated in 1823. What's interesting is that the city fathers of Tallahassee (including Francis Eppes and other area plantation owners) are the force behind the 1823 law. Eppes was a young man at the time and was apparently greatly influenced by his grandfather Thomas Jefferson (who founded the University of Virginia) who believed higher education as a driver of state wealth.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sirberus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Day meetup at University of Florida on January 15

Remember when you asked to be notified about the next Wikipedia meetup in Gainesville, Florida? Good news! I'm organizing a meetup to celebrate Wikipedia Day at the University of Florida Marston Science Library from 4pm to 7pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2019. You can find more about the event on its event page -- I hope you'll be able to join us!

If you wish to opt-out of future notifications, please remove yourself from the list of interested users. Alternatively, to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Thank you so much for your attention! -- Gaurav (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Art+Feminism editathon in Gainesville this Saturday, March 16, 2019

The Harn Museum of Art in Gainesville, Florida is organizing an Art+Feminism editathon this Saturday, March 16 from 11am to 4:30pm. You can find out more on their Outreach Dashboard or on the Harn's website.

If you wish to opt-out of future notifications, please remove yourself from the list of interested users. Alternatively, to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. -- Gaurav (talk) 00:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Florida State University

Florida State University has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I am interested. Thanks for the heads-up. Sirberus (talk) 13:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some of your requested updates. What else?Sirberus (talk) 10:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florida State University College of Applied Studies (July 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Florida State University College of Applied Studies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sirberus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No sweat - it was just a stub. Thanks for the heads-up. Sirberus (talk) 09:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]