User talk:SirSamvi

Welcome!

Hi SirSamvi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GPL93 (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SirSamvi! Your additions to Draft:Hashim Al-Witry have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hashim Al-Witry (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jenyire2 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires more sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hashim Al-Witry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hashim Al-Witry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jenyire2 20:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SirSamvi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jenyire2 20:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Sayyid Hashim Al-Witry draft

Hi - happy to help with your draft. The subject is clearly notable. There are three areas to work on: the references, the infobox and the text. I'll make some changes in each area and leave some notes here. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Goldsztajn, that is perfectly fine, there is a lot of work that I need to do on this article and many more sections to write about that I still haven't started, I want to make sure that there are enough sources to translate properly without missing out any important mentions. Any ammendments made to the draft would incredibly help out as I'm hoping to replicate the layout later on to write more articles about other notable subjects. Regards SirSamvi (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hashim Al-Witry

Hello, SirSamvi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hashim Al-Witry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hashim Al-Witry has been accepted

Hashim Al-Witry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 23:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'e acepted itk bu not all the material is appropriate for aWP article. Please do not restore what I've deleted. DGG ( talk ) 23:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DGG, Thank you for accepting the article, may I ask for the reason of removing a big chunk of the honouring section of the article as it included important historical events such as the presence of the poet who recited his panegyric in front of the Royal guests and Ministers? I'll be writing a few more articles of reputable people from Iraq, so it'll be a good learning curve to know what to avoid. SirSamvi (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A WP article is intended for the general reader who may have heard of the name, and wishes to find out something about the person and their work. They are not likely to be interested in poetry recited at the funeral, a funeral oration, and information about the poet; if they should be, a reference or an external link is enough. "Important historical events" in the persons background should be covered in articles about those events. Extensive information about heir family is not appropriate: the names and occupations of the parents is sufficient. If anything, there's still too much of the historical and family background. What the reader cares about is the part of his biography relevant to his notability , which is as a physician. DGG ( talk ) 19:48, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]