User talk:SirBrahms
Welcome!
[edit]Hi SirBrahms! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! gobonobo + c 17:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
gobonobo + c 17:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina aethiopica has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)AfC notification: Draft:Trichorhina acuta has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina acuta has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina amazonica has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~Liancetalk 13:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina anophthalma has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
bonadea contributions talk 07:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina argentina has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
bonadea contributions talk 09:42, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Species drafts
[edit]Hi SirBrahms, I'm Bonadea, known from such talk page posts as "Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina anophthalma has been accepted". Thank you for creating these species drafts! Since there are usually no issues with them, there is no real reason for you to create them as drafts to be submitted and reviewed by other editors – you are welcome to create articles without going through the Articles for Creation process, though you may of course keep using AfC if you prefer. Personally, when I create a new article (which is not very often), I first create it as a draft in my sandbox and move it to encyclopedia space when I think it's ready for that.
One thing I wanted to mention, which many editors are not aware of, is that when you cite a journal article, the "page" parameter should be the page(s) where the information is supported. It is by no means a major issue if the parameter shows the range of pages for the article in the publication, the way references in journal articles do, but it's better to use the parameter correctly since that helps the reader locate the information more quickly! More information here. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! I will make sure to update my articles.
- I will probably be moving off AfC soon (especially with your suggestion, thank you!!), but I still have some articles that are in the AfC-system.
- Best, SirBrahms (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Trichorhina atlasi has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ratnahastin (talk) 09:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)WoRMS references
[edit]Hi @SirBrahms. Our paths seem to have crossed, whilst working on the genus Iais. I note that you have posted the same question on three fora asking for help with templates, admittedly you were redirected twice. The first time you asked the question, you provided examples of what you regarded 'good' - Iais chilense and 'bad' - Janiridae. I have looked at these pages, and whilst they both access the WoRMS database, they do in different ways: 'Good' uses the right way with {{Cite WoRMS}}; 'Bad' attempts to do the same thing using {{Cite journal}} which is probably not supported and definitely not advisable.
So, I would say WP:be bold and change it yourself. As long as you follow the syntax in Template:Cite WoRMS and make your edits in good faith, you are doing the right thing and improving the encyclopaedia. I make corrections like this all the time. Here is how I changed it (although, that was from {{cite web}} but you should get the idea). I hope that answers your question, if not; I hope the fora come through for you! Big Blue Cray(fish) Twins (talk) 20:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! While this doesn't fully answer my question, it does provide a way to correct faulty links. - SirBrahms (talk) 09:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Hollywood Boulevard Commercial and Entertainment District GA Nomination
[edit]I updated the lede and am pinging you as you requested. Thanks!!! Gb321 (talk) 06:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Changes made! Notifying you as requested. Gb321 (talk) 20:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Hollywood Boulevard Commercial and Entertainment District GA Nomination 2
[edit]Not sure if you noticed my messages that I made the changes
Thank you for participating in the October 2024 GAN backlog drive
[edit]
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Your noteworthy contribution (5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC) |