User talk:Siobhan.mcmorran

Speedy deletion nomination of Hospitality Management Holding

Hello Siobhan.mcmorran,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hospitality Management Holding for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

11 Cadogan Gardens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chelsea

Hotels in London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chelsea

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:The lygon arms, from its old location at User:Siobhan.mcmorran/The lygon arms. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 12:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The lygon arms (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dlohcierekim was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It would be better to have more not local coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The lygon arms and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Siobhan.mcmorran, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:42, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Hotels (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Hotels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Siobhan.mcmorran. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Grace Hotels, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Hotels has been accepted

Grace Hotels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Your addition to Grace Hotels has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lygon Arms has been accepted

Lygon Arms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lygon Arms

On 20 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lygon Arms, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that both Oliver Cromwell and Kylie Minogue have stayed at the Lygon Arms (pictured)?" The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lygon Arms. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lygon Arms), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 02:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lygon Arms

Hello Siobhan, thanks for creating this article! The building clearly seems to be a notable topic, and I've filled out the article by citing the listing, linking to a Wikimedia Commons category and adding some categories.

However, I'm a bit concerned by the sourcing. Much of the information about the hotel's early history seems to have come from the hotel's own branding material, which presumably was not written by a professional historian or by a disinterested author. I've got to be honest, I've reviewed a lot of Wikipedia articles and such information is often misunderstood even if it's not wholesale fabrications. I notice that the listing dates the building to the seventeenth century with no mention of any earlier history, and this local history book dates it to the sixteenth.

Is there any chance we could have some more professional sources, in particular more details of what this 1377 document is and where it can be found, or references to specific biographies of Cromwell or Charles I which discuss their stays? Blythwood (talk) 17:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Siobhan.mcmorran: What is your connection to these hotels then? Hope you're well! —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 13:20, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The River Lee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The River Lee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The River Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 16:47, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Croke Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Croke Park, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2600:6C4E:580:46B:0:E653:2549:B879 (talk) 17:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grace Hotels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grace Hotels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Hotels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 17:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest warning

Hello Siobhan, thanks for joining Wikipedia! I notice that all your edits are on the topics of various hotels and their management companies, and this leads me to wonder if you have some connection, or "conflict of interest" with them, such as that you are an employee or contractor or being paid for editing Wikipedia to market them. I notice also that you were asked if you have any such connection in December 2017 and July 2018 and did not respond to either message.

If you are editing Wikipedia for commercial purposes this isn't necessarily a problem, but if this is so, you must immediately file a disclosure statement explaining any conflict of interest to ensure transparency-this is indeed a legal requirement that you have already agreed to under section 4 of the Wikimedia terms of service, which both you and your business could face legal action for failing to comply with. Here's an example of what a disclosure statement looks like - but let me know if you have any kind of questions about this, privately by email is fine if you’re having problems.

You should also ensure that all your edits are factual and could not be considered in any way promotional, and are backed up by citations to reliable sources demonstrating them to be true. Please respond to this message before editing Wikipedia further. An automated message explaining this more formally is added below. Hope this is OK, let me know if you have any thoughts or questions. Blythwood (talk) 20:34, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Siobhan.mcmorran. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.