User talk:Sinwiki12

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HQ-16, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deutz and IDEAS. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transport Aircraft Comparison

Hello Sinwiki12, the WikiProject Aircraft has seen your comparison table in Military Transport Aircraft articles like Shaanxi Y-9 and Xi'an Y-20. We really like your table and think it had even a higher benefit if it is put to Military transport aircraft. Then readers of all military transports will have a link to it. Would you agree and move it there? --JuergenKlueser (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yes good

Great! So thank you in advance for moving the table! --JuergenKlueser (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CJ-10 to DF-10

Please find a source that supports the CJ-10 and DF-10 referring to the same missile before making the move. Then be sure to use that source to show that the designation has changed. For example, you can't attribute "DF-10" to Gormley or APA because those sources don't use that designation. For a similar reason, APA can't be used to support the claim that "the name of the missile family was finalised" as DF-10.

I hope you haven't been taking similar liberties with your other edits to missile articles. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. "Sources" does not mean any webpage that happens to contain the terms you're looking for. The sources you've used are of questionable reliability.

These two:

are blogs written by nobody of note and with no editorial oversight.

This one:

https://www.armyrecognition.com/china_chinese_army_missile_systems_vehicles/df-10_cj-10_dh-10_cruise_missile_surface-to-surface_technical_data_sheet_specifications_pictures_video_12301163.html

appears to be effectively self-published based on the about page of armyrecognition.com.

Please find appropriate sources. Otherwise, I'll revert the move.

Additionally, please read the section on where and how to place references (WP:INTEGRITY). In the article introduction, you have again attributed the use of the designation DF-10 to Gromley. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning:

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/realtime/china/story20180625-870031

This source appears to say that the DF-10A is part of the CJ-10 family, something that the article already has sources for. This doesn't support the claim that the DF-10 is the CJ-10.

In any case, there is another problem with just changing all uses of "CJ-10" to "DF-10" in the article. In the past, CJ-10 was used to reference an air-to-surface missile, whereas the DF-10 is supposed to be a surface-to-surface missile. Such changes muddle, if not outright mangle, what the sources actually say. If you do happen to find sources that can support the change from CJ-10 to DF-10, please open a discussion on the article talk page because it will require some thought to figure out how to integrate it.

Until then, I shall revert the name change. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 21:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SPI

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sinwiki12. Thank you. Estnot (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm RovingPersonalityConstruct. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Type 052D destroyer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 11:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at CJ-10 (missile), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. It's the same issue that you have years ago (#CJ-10_to_DF-10) - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 19:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from CNP / ACP nuclear reactors into Nuclear power in China. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your cut-and-paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give British expedition to Tibet a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into British invasion of Tibet. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Electric vehicle industry in China

added a link pointing to NCM

Lithium iron phosphate battery

added a link pointing to NCM

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of countries by military expenditures. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Also applies to recent edits to the YJ-83. Ensure that sources agree with what you add (WP:INTEGRITY). And as a matter of housekeeping, don't use bare URLs as references (WP:BAREURLS). You've been editing for 1.5 years; it's time to improve. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 15:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sinwiki12

Thank you for creating History of electric vehicle industry in China.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sinwiki12

Thank you for creating Semiconductor industry in China.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Sinwiki12

Thank you for creating Hua Hong Semiconductor.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. This applies to your edits since May. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 20:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tibet (1912-1951), you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at HQ-16. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 01:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to Mahayana seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! JimRenge (talk) 10:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using Youtube as a source

Try not to use Youtube links by themselves when sourcing stuff. As you probably know, Wikipedia is stupidly picky on it. For video sources, it's usually best to find the source of the video itself (such as a documentary). ADifferentMan (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fuxing (train).

06:30, 21 July 2023: Sinwiki12 (talk | contribs) triggered filter 869, performing the action "edit" on Fuxing (train). Actions taken: Warn; Filter description: Adding deprecated source to articles, you may be blocked from editing. 06:30, 21 July 2023: Sinwiki12 (talk Rastinition (talk) 06:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at China Merchants Group, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao (talk) 16:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Agency for Global Media

Reverted your contributions to U.S. Agency for Global Media as the new language is not supported by the cited sources. Please ensure additions match the source. -- dsprc ^[talk] 13:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GS notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Uyghurs, Uyghur genocide, or topics that are related to Uyghurs or Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Amigao (talk) 20:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to U.S. Agency for Global Media. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 22:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. cogsan • (give me attention) • (see my deeds) 19:33, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lourdes 06:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]