User talk:Sinaamasa

You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.

Welcome

Hello, Sinaamasa, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RevEye

The article RevEye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSOFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sam Sailor ^Sing 09:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Baahubali does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Raghusri 10:22, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rev Eye Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rev Eye Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danish Khan

The article Danish Khan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Danish Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Danish Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Danish Khan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Danish Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Manam Motion Poster Video.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manam Motion Poster Video.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:12, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danish Khan.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danish Khan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 08:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Deccan Chronicle paper Sunday's article are now enabled with Motion Print by Rev Eye.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Deccan Chronicle paper Sunday's article are now enabled with Motion Print by Rev Eye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mobile (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@DPL bot: Thanks for your comments.

Nomination of Danish Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danish Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danish Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WOWSOME for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WOWSOME is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOWSOME until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 13:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message

Thank you for your message on my user talk page. I'm not sure what you mean by "should I close the alert" - you already removed the "advert" tag from the article. The Articles for Deletion tag must not be removed until the discussion is closed. As explained in the notice above this one, a deletion discussion goes on until there is a consensus. Normally, such a discussion stays open for seven days and is then closed by an uninvolved administrator who makes a decision whether to keep or delete the article based on all policy-based arguments in the discussion. --bonadea contributions talk 08:34, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's fine to remove the Advert tag - perhaps you took it off a little too early, but then the promotional text was edited out of the article. So don't worry about that. --bonadea contributions talk 08:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with WOWSOME. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page.

I'm sorry if my previous notice was unclear. The "Articles for deletion" template must not be removed until the discussion here has been closed. An uninvolved administrator will close and archive the discussion in due course. bonadea contributions talk 09:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sinaamasa. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:12, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:22, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Rev Eye App.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Rev Eye App.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of augmented reality software, you may be blocked from editing.

Please do not make any more edits related to WOWSOME. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bonadea, I've updated Manam Motion Print topic at Manam page and I request you to confirm me whether the information or link is kind of promotion/spamming or not. So that I would be more clear in my coming edits. Thank you!!

Speedy deletion nomination of WOWSOME app

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WOWSOME app, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above: Articles that have been deleted after an Articles for Deletion discussion must not be recreated. You have to go to deletion review and ask whether the decision in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOWSOME can be overturned.

However, as has been pointed out before, you should not make any edits related to Wowsome, since you have a clear conflict of interest in that your purpose in being here appears to be only to promote that product and the company behind it. If there should be an article about Wowsome app in the future, you can make suggestions for edits on its talk page, but you should avoid editing the article yourself. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 08:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with WOWSOME app. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 08:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Adding Wowsome to a list of applications might seem like a harmless thing; however, since you have been repeatedly asked not to make any edits related to Wowsome, it is disruptive. Once again: You can use the article's talk page to request that an edit be made to the article, and some uninvolved editor can then decide whether to implement the suggested change or not. bonadea contributions talk 08:24, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WOWSOME app

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on WOWSOME app, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 14:26, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page.

You may not recreate the article about WOWSOME app. I'm sorry if the note following your previous recreation of this article was unclear - here it is again:

Articles that have been deleted after an Articles for Deletion discussion must not be recreated. You have to go to deletion review and ask whether the decision in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOWSOME can be overturned.

However, as has been pointed out before, you should not make any edits related to Wowsome, since you have a clear conflict of interest in that your purpose in being here appears to be only to promote that product and the company behind it. If there should be an article about Wowsome app in the future, you can make suggestions for edits on its talk page, but you should avoid editing the article yourself. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 14:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Indian Luxury Expo

Hello Sinaamasa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Indian Luxury Expo for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BlogBeats

Hello Sinaamasa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BlogBeats for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TimothyJosephWood 13:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Despite the repeated warnings above, you have continued to create inappropriate pages. This is disruptive and wastes the time of the community to clean up. Accordingly, I have blocked your account from editing indefinitely. "Indefinitely" need not mean permanently. Before you'd be permitted to edit again, please fully read through and ensure you fully understand our policies on neutrality, notability, and promotional editing. Also, if you are being paid or employed to edit any article, or have been, please make the mandatory disclosures listed at the requirements for paid editors. After doing so, you may read the guide to appealing blocks which details how to request to have your account unblocked. If your unblock request does not show understanding of these problems and a plan to fix them going forward, it is unlikely to be successful. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sinaamasa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Team From now onwards we will not do the promotions content on wikipedia Kindly unblock the wikipedia editing page

Decline reason:

Group accounts ("we") are not allowed on the English Wikipedia - accounts are for individuals only. You would need to assure us that only one person will use this account, and also explain what else you wish to work on if unblocked. And you would need to comply fully with WP:COI and WP:PAID. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:20, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sinaamasa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Team,We are talking from the Team of Sinaamasa. It’s been a shock for our mates to see such a long list of warnings regarding the activities done from our end. As the usage of the account has been done in an immature manner and the seekers in our team were not being able to learn that it was going to become illegitimate, we had no clue where it was going. We request you with great genuineness that we have gone through many researches and found what are all the mistakes had we committed from the beginning. We hereby say it firmly that this is, and will be the final chance that we want to seek from you for being able to get the unblock request accepted. Please kindly notice the emergence of mistakes happened at the early stages of learning and unblock the account from editing. I and my team assure you that every conversation from hereon will be monitored and taken care seriously to avoid any such issues happening in future. Please consider the request of my team. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Obviously not. It looks like you didn't bother reading Boing!'s response above. Yamla (talk) 12:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sinaamasa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We seriously regret the matter which is the reason behind we repeatedly requesting for the approval. Earlier, it was the learners who didn’t explore the User’s Account well and it led to such a problematic situation. But now, we the heads of the team are involving in the context and also we take the responsibility of consequences of our further actions. We do a thorough research on the handles and their maintenance. We sincerely appeal to you that upon any irresponsible act from now on, we will not come to you with any request to approve the unblock request. And about the promotional activities made in the account, the doers had only one intention to place the hyperlinks but were not aware of all the spams that were happening. We sincerely say that it is still an unknown consequence but not an ignorant act. Kindly consider the request, we shall immediately make all the changes that are required. It is a promise. At this stage, all we can do is rectifying the mistakes and resolving all the problems. So please try to understand the situation and kindly cope with it. We shall definitely stand up to the right things. Request.

Decline reason:

As you are not addressing the reasons for the block, or even indicating that you have read the replies to your unblock requests here, I am declining this request. You will need to use WP:UTRS to request unblock, but you should only do so if you heed what you are being told here. If English is not your primary language, you may find it easier to edit the version of Wikipedia of your native language. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you are ignoring what you are being told and really just saying the same things repeatedly, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. The next reviewing admin can restore it without consulting me if they think it is wise. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]