User talk:Simonfanultimate

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anarchyte was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Simonfanultimate/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Anar chyte 05:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Simonfanultimate, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Anar chyte 05:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Simonfanultimate/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Simonfanultimate/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Anar chyte 05:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Donner60. An edit you recently made to James Hingston Tuckey seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to New York with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shay Carl, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Shay Carl was changed by Simonfanultimate (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861765 on 2015-08-24T03:23:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:35, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and while you are allowed to blank messages on your talk page, we'll know about it and will regard it as a sign that you've read the message. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Cause I am the hacker Simon or what the hell his name is hasn't been on here for a while and idc what happens to this account...

You're not a hacker, you're just another kid who doesn't know how to use the site. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Try me

I bet you can't even delete system32 on your computer. You probably buy into all those warnings like the other non-hacker sheeple. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, Simonfanultimate. Tropicalkitty (talk) 03:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your privileges to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. — MusikAnimal ^talk 04:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]