User talk:Simon John Pearce

May 2015

Hello, I'm Saturn star. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Saturn star (talk) 14:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Entwistle railway station. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Please see WP:Citing sources (or if you find that too complex, Help:Referencing for beginners). What we need are titles, authors, year of publication - something that will precisely identify the source; also the page number or something else which will precisely identify the place within the source (for example, maps (other than atlases) don't have page numbers but usually have sheet numbers and grid squares). Things like publisher and town of publication are nice to have, but not essential.

We do not need to know which library you used; given an adequate reference, others should be able to locate the same material in another library, such as those at Manchester or Blackburn - even London or Oxford. Putting "at Bolton Central Library" is about as useful as saying that you rode there on the 541 bus from Canon Slade School. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Is this an attack page?". Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 20:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TURTON STATION (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TURTON STATION and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Simon John Pearce, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:TURTON STATION

Hello, Simon John Pearce. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "TURTON STATION".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]