User talk:Simon1811

Welcome!

Hello, Simon1811, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 18:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis

I have undone an edit you had made to a paragraph I had written, on the article 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis as I believe that it is unconstructive, and may harm the neutrality of the article. To refute your edit comment "anti-maduro is not used so neither should pro-maduro", pro-Maduro is perfectly acceptable, but rather than "anti-Maduro" (which is a violation of neutral tone in itself), we instead use "pro-Guaidó". The phrase "pro-Maduro" is important to the meaning of the sentence, and if removed (as you did), should've been replaced by a synonym instead. Uses x (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis

Hello, I'm Jamez42. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 14:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Guaidó

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Juan Guaidó, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamez42: What are you talking about? Simon1811 (talk) 23:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] --Jamez42 (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamez42: As previously stated that piece of information is not relevant to Guaido's domestic policy.Simon1811 (talk) 23:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but next time make sure to explain the issue in the talk page, knowing how controversial it is. Also, the message is because it does have to do with his policy. Quoting from the last version of the article: "As of 1 February 2019, Guaidó has announced a National Assembly-approved amnesty law for police, military and authorities who help restore constitutional order; announced a sector-by-sector plan, called Plan País, for the revitalization of the country considering the crisis in Venezuela, with attention to the most poverty-stricken; secured a promise of humanitarian aid from the US and announced plans for international shipments and convoys" (bold added). The domestic policy section further explain this and even has a sub section called Humanitarian assistance. The military defection and humanitarian aid have been one of the two main policy proposals by Guaidó. --Jamez42 (talk) 23:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treaty of Coche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coche (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Crisis in Venezuela

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Crisis in Venezuela. --Jamez42 (talk) 11:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Apollo The Logician, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Jamez42 (talk) 15:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]