User talk:Silverwhistle
Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics!
You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.
Here are some helpful links:
- Wikipedia:Merge, for information about merging, renaming and moving pages.
- Wikipedia directory is also quite useful.
- Meet other new users You may want to add yourself to the Wikipedia new user log.
- Assign edits to your username from before you registered.
- Be Bold!
- Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
- Play nice with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
- How to upload files and image copyright tags.
By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.
Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!∞Who?¿? 10:45, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Montferrat
[edit]Hi Silverwhistle, you are probably more knowledgeable about this subject than I am, so hopefully you can help out: someone recently created Count of Montferrat, which is actually just the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica article, although we already have info about that at the Montferrat article, including the list of marquises. Should we just get rid of the new Count of Monferrat article and redirect it to Montferrat, or should we create a new Marquis of Montferrat article (since that was their title, not Count) and move all the medieval info and the list from the Montferrat article? Or some other suggestion? Adam Bishop 22:49, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Mr. Silverwhistle,
I wanted to thank you for asking us of the Piedmontese wikipedia to translate the article. I started the translation | Corad dël monfrà, and wanted to inform you about it. --Bertulot 10:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Hulloo!
[edit]Obnoxiously heritage-obsessed American wannabe historian reporting! --Benn M. 01:29, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hi! I've never used the Talk pages before! This looks fun!
Silverwhistle 00:34, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Crusade factions
[edit]Hi Silverwhistle, yes, I've noticed that as well - I learned about court/noble factions and this is always repeated in the older scholarship, but newer research like Hamilton talks about it much differently. I just came back from a crusade conference and it really shattered everything I thought I knew, including these factions. I'm not sure what to do with all these Wikipedia articles now, except perhaps start over from scratch... Adam Bishop 18:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- By the way, the court/noble division of the factions is still prominent in the Kingdom of Jerusalem article (since I, unfortunately, put it there). If you have time, could you fix it there too? I haven't had time to work on that lately, and you probably have a better understanding of the newer research than I do. Adam Bishop 07:19, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! I wish I could help out with these articles more, but I suppose I should finish classes first (and I can't connect to Wikipedia at home at the moment anyway). For images, click "upload file" in the toolbox on the left, and follow the steps from there. Adam Bishop 02:05, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- By the way, now that I have been thinking about how much I used to think I knew and how little I actually do know, I was reminded of something that always seemed incredible - Sibylla's re-marriage to Guy. Does anyone question the accuracy of that episode? Raymond et al. would have had to have been pretty stupid not to see that coming, or so it seems to me (but of course, in hindsight...) Adam Bishop 03:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- I remembered something else I haven't had a chance to look into yet...maybe you will know. We currently have a stubby article at Battle of Jacob's Ford, but what is the proper name of this battle? Is it Jacob's Ford, or the Ford of Jacob's Daughters? Is it the same as the Battle of Marj Ayun? (I can't remember what "marj" means but I think Ayun is Jonah, obviously not Jacob...) Are they just different engagements in the same campaign? Where was Baldwin of Ibelin captured? Adam Bishop 05:59, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
William Longsword
[edit]Interesting. I merely figured that, as a figure predominant in what is today Italy, he was preponderantly the interest of Italian historians whose work would have been one of the sources for many English works on him and his family. So what's the Latin? Do you know? Srnec 18:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Baldwin IV
[edit]Hi. I think you think it was me who amended the article to add the bit about him being noseless, but it wasn't. I just made a very tiny spelling amendment. Interesting point, though. Deb 17:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Sibylla and Agnes
[edit]Hello! I wished to say I really do like the additonal information on these pages! And the image of the marriage of Sibylla is fantastic! I have a simular image i wish to add too, but have not yet added it.
In regards to the edits, Benard Hamilton, in his artical on the Queens of Jerusalem, states Baldwin of Ibelin was in Byzantium. But maybe he was referring to Eroll's account. I will review that portion of the book again. But the other editing, I removed the section that said that it was way to fantastic to beleive Eurol's account. But down the paragraph there is a sentance that says Raymond was indeed attepmpting to wed Sibylla to Baldwin. So there 'may be' a kernal of truth to the 'fantastic tale'. We don't honestly know how Sibylla may have felt towards Guy. She might just have easily been his prisioner in 1184 as his accomplice. Clearly I kept the spirit of your additions.Drachenfyre 09:45, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- by the by, hehe, why are the de Montferret's your 'favorite mideival family'Drachenfyre 09:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Joscius
[edit]Hey Silverwhistle, I just wrote Joscius, Archbishop of Tyre...I don't know if you have easier access to the Third Crusade sources than I do, but I'm sure there is more information in them if you feel like expanding it (my sources are currently limited to what I can find strewn about the floor of my room!). Adam Bishop 03:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Henry (VII)
[edit]Hey, that business of the leprosy is pretty cool. It certainly adds a new element to his story, particularly a motivation for his suicide. Choess 20:59, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hard to say. The natural contumacity of the Hohenstaufen may have been enough. What blows my mind is that, AIUI, there had been no suspicion whatsoever of leprosy until they examined his remains — it must have been a secret in his own time. The polemical value of the son of that unfaithful servant of Christ's Vicar, Frederick II, falling prey to the curse of Gehazi would have been immense. His symptoms, if any, before his revolt and captivity, must have been readily concealed — of course, as leader of a revolt, it wasn't in his interests to let it be known, either. Choess 00:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Tidying up
[edit]Hi! I saw you copyedited Henry Vi, Holy Roman Emperor... of course it was written by somebody who, like me, is not of English mothertongue. Can I ask to do the same with Malatesta Baglioni and Roger of Lauria? Let me know. Attilios 22:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
Re: Link to user page
[edit]Linking to a user page from an article is a self-reference, which is something that should be avoided. Linking to an article about yourself would be okay, but keep in mind that writing an article about yourself (since one doesn't appear to exist currently) is strongly discouraged. Ardric47 23:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
How did you do that note?
[edit](copied from User talk:Andrew Dalby) --
...on the page for Conrad of Montferrat? I wanted to expand it, referring to Choniates (better source on this than Roger), but can't see how to when I went into 'Edit'. Silverwhistle 14:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- It's the only way I know how to do them. The text of the note appears embedded in the relevant paragraph, surrounded by ref ... /ref. At the foot of the article you type the single full word, references / (each of these surrounded by angle brackets). Open an edit page for the whole article and you'll see. Does that answer the question?
- True, Nicetas has good information including the description of Conrad already quoted in the text. He should be added to the note, I agree. But Roger seems well informed on the Montferrats and includes the detail that Christian was left in Boniface's care. He also lists the three places where Christian was successively held, but since I can't interpret these names I did not include them. Can you? 1. In castello quod vocatur Sanctus Flavianus; 2. in roca Venais; 3. apud Eghependant (spellings as in the very old edition I have). All the best Andrew Dalby 15:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
de Amendolea
[edit]I don't object to the emendation — Amendolea seems to be the form preferred for the place at present — but William and his family seemed rather flexible about its spelling. Check the index of Röhricht: William and some of his relatives (one Perrotinus sticks in my head) appear under various appellations, and I think "Mandelee" or something like that is one of them. Choess 00:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
Hi, and welcome to the Biography WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of biographies.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Our article structure tips outlines some things to include.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every biography article in Wikipedia.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! plange 16:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for the link at the foot of Philip of Cognac, which taught me that a lot of the Rolls Series is available at [1]. Andrew Dalby 18:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Cut-and-paste moves
[edit]Hello! Please don't use cut-and-paste moves, like it looks like you did on Blondel, which I've attempted to sort out. When you change a page's name by cutting-and-pasting, it breaks the page's history, meaning other people who have contributed don't get proper attribution for their edits. In the future, please use the "Move" tab, or if there's a redirect in the way, ask at Wikipedia:Requested moves or just ask a nice administrator (like me). For more information see Help:Moving a page. I see you're interested in troubadours, so I thought I'd give a quick plug to check out Trobairitz, which I started. Cheers, Mak (talk) 23:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Fine, you win
[edit]I'm sorry I acted so hostile toward you in the talk pages. I realised too late that you can delete edits faster than I can make them. But please look at my arguments once more. To me Richard's homosexuality isn't a liberal thing, or a 'new age' rendition of things - it's a probable fact.
- Again, I apologise for the stuff I wrote. I'm just crazy like that. Augustulus 23:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Helping out with the Unassessed Wikipedia Biographies
[edit]Seeing that you are an active member of the WikiBiography Project, I was wondering if you would help lend a hand in helping us clear out the amount of [unassessed articles] tagged with {{WPBiography}}. Many of them are of stub and start class, but a few are of B or A caliber. Getting a simple assessment rating can help us start moving many of these biographies to a higher quality article. Thank you! --Ozgod 22:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
aldebaran69
[edit]THANKS FOR YOUR CORRECTIONS, SILVERWHISTLE.
BUT IN SEVERAL WEBSITES, BONIFACE I OF MONTFERRAT HAVE 3 WIVES:
- HELENA DEL BOSCO -THE MOTHER OF HIS ELDER CHILDREN-
- ELEONORA DI SAVOIA -THE APPARENTLY UNEXISTEN WIFE-
- MARGARET OF HUNGARY, DOWAGER EMPRESS OF BIZANTYUM.
IN THE BIOGRAPHY, YOU POST 4 WIFES -BETWEEN HELENA AND ELEONORA-; YOU KNOW IS IDENTITY?...
SORRY FOR MY BAD ENGLISH -I'AM PERUVIAN BUT I TRIED TO LEARN QUICKLY-
THANKS AGAIN...
RONALD (ALDEBARAN69)
Aldebaran69
[edit]Hi Silverwhistle:
Thanks for the advice about my tipe of writing. Now, I hope you can help in one problem I had in one of the biographs i tried to fix: Alfonso VI of Castile.
None of the sources I consulted give a real solution about the exact numbers of wifes of this King; some say five, others say six, others even seven!
I had a list for you and, i hope you can check it and tell me how is the correct number:
1.-Agnes of Aquitanie, daughter of the Count William X of Aquitaine (some sources say IX). Married with the King ca.1069, the marriage was annuled (1077) because Agnes was sterile.
2.-Constance of Burgundy, daughter of the First Duke of Burgundy, Robert I and granddaughter of the King Robert II of France. After her marriage with Alfonso (1080), she had previously married with the Count of Chalon, Hugh II. Constance and Alfonso had -according to some sources- five children, but only the eldest, Urraca, survived nad finaly became Queen of Castile and Leon. I tried to all the ways to find the names or sex of this four siblings of Urraca, and his date of birth, but I can't. If you had any notice of this, please let me know.
3.-Berta of Maçon-Burgundy. Married ca.1093, she died ca.1096-97, apparently childless.
Here began the confussion:
4.-Zaida, muslim princess, baptised as Isabel and died ca.1107. She bore to the King two daughters (one of them Elvira, married with Roger II of Sicily) and the only son of the King, Sancho, killed in the battle of Ucles.
Some sources alleged she was only a concubine, but others say she was the legitimate wife of the King.
5.- An unknow Isabelle of France. I can't find the conection withe the Capetian Royal Family.
6.- Beatriz. His parentage is confuse; say she was of D'este family, others, of hte Ducal House of Aquitaine. she was the last wife.
Please of I was wrong, let me Know.
Thanks
Aldebaran69 01:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikiproject Biography March 2007 Newsletter
[edit]The March 2007 issue of the Biography WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Mocko13 22:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007
[edit]The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. BetacommandBot 20:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Old World / New World
[edit]Regarding your edit summary for the Common Buzzard, I'd disagree that it is a patronising turn of phrase - it's fairly common to describe bird and other distributions in terms of New World and Old World (see New World vulture, Old World warbler, Old World flycatcher). More accurately you could use the more specific ecozone terms Nearctic or Palearctic, Afrotropical or Neotropical, but these aren't as widely understood and there is no ecotropical term that lumps Nearctic and Neotropical on the one side and Palearctic, Afrotropical and Indomalayan on the other. While the term may have Eurocentric connotations when discussing colonialism and history, it doesn't when talking biogeography. Sabine's Sunbird talk 23:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
[edit]
 Volume IV, no. 4 - September 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Congratulations to our 225 new members |
The newsletter is back! Many things have gone on during the past few months, but many things have not. While the assessment drive helped revitalize the assessment department of the project, many other departments have received no attention. Most notably: peer review and our "workgroups". A day long IRC meeting has been planned for October 13th, with the major focus being which areas of the project are "dead", what should our goals be as a project, and how to "revive" the dead areas of our project. Contribute to the discussion on the the new channel (see below) We decided to deliver this newsletter to all project members this month but only those with their names down here will get it delivered in the future. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned or post news on the next issue's talk page
Lastly, a new WikiProject Biography channel has been set up on the freenode network: Our thanks to Phoenix 15 for setting it up.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Complete To Do List
Suzanne Carrell • Mullá Husayn • John Gilchrist (linguist) • Thomas Brattle •
Assessment Progress
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 16:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .
Chinon Document
[edit]I have added a paragraph to the relevant articles and would welcome you opinion and advice. Mugginsx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Margraves/Marquis/Marquesses? of Montferrat
[edit]You seem to be inactive as of now, but considering your interest in the Montferrat family, perhaps you would be interested in the discussion I have had with Michael Sanders concerning his renaming of the rulers of Montferrat from "[Name] [Ordinal] of Montferrat" to "[Name] [Ordinal], Marquess of Montferrat". I have opened a discussion at Talk:Rulers of Montferrat. Srnec (talk) 03:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
George Johnstone
[edit]Hello. I noticed that some time ago you added a bit of information about the illegitimate children of George Johnstone and Martha Ford to his page. I am a Florida historian who is researching their relationship in the context of his governorship in Florida. I would love to "chat" with you about where you can by your information if you are so inclined. Thanks! DeborahLBauer (talk) 01:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)DeborahLBauer
William IX and the convent for prostitutes
[edit]Hi,
Can you please take a look at Talk:William IX, Duke of Aquitaine#Convent for prostitutes?
Thanks. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 06:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Elizabeth Shore.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Elizabeth Shore.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
File:Baldwin V of Jerusalem tomb.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baldwin V of Jerusalem tomb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chesdovi (talk) 10:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Silverwhistle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Floris and Blancheflour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Silverwhistle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Silverwhistle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello
You added a bit to this article a while ago: I have queried this (here), if you wish to comment. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Ivanhoe (1952 film)
[edit]Hello, Silverwhistle! I don't know if you're aware of the fact that your recent edit of the above film has been reverted by an editor called Frankaustx, claiming that it is 'unsourced opinion'. (He also reverted two of my earlier edits, claiming something similar.) You attempted to correct Miklos Rozsa's description of "Reis glorios" as a hymn. You can undo his his reversion by going on the page history, clicking the "Undo" button and following the instructions. If you do, I suggest that you add a reference for Rg. If you don't, I will gladly do it for you. Best Wishes. O Murr (talk) 21:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! Will have a look. It's an alba (dawn song): one just has to read the whole lyrics to see it isn't a hymn! Silverwhistle (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The file File:Catherine Cornaro by Bellini.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Superseded by c:File:Gentile Bellini 002.jpg.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:02, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
You have been pruned from a list
[edit]Hi Silverwhistle! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)