Jump to content

User talk:SilverProf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello there, I am a university professor doing an A+F edit-a-thon with my senior undergraduate students. Our focus is on Canadian feminist filmmakers, but we're also selecting some personal faves!

Studio D (National Film Board of Canada), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Studio D (National Film Board of Canada)

[edit]

Hello, SilverProf,

Thank you for creating Studio D (National Film Board of Canada).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article is meticulously researched, interesting and largely well-written, but its tone is slightly too favorable to the subject slightly to comply with Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines, in addition to having some minor WP:MOS discrepancies such as not following the correct section heading capitalization scheme and improperly including external links in the article body.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 23:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits completed by SilverProf

[edit]

{{Re|Rosguill}}Thank you for the feedback. I removed some of the content that was identified as having a bit of "tone" and added more content critical of Studio D. I fixed the section headers and external links.

--SilverProf (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)SilverProf[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Todd Hénaut (September 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, SilverProf! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dorothy Todd Hénaut

[edit]

Information icon Hello, SilverProf. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dorothy Todd Hénaut, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]