User talk:Silvenapt

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Todor Vassilev. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Etrigan (talk) 09:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silvenapt, the sole author, blanked the page. This is commonly interpreted as a {{db-g7}} request. – Athaenara ✉ 09:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Template:BLP/doc has been reverted. You added the name "Todor Hristov Vassilev" in the middle of the template, which did not appear to have any constructive purpose, so presumably it was an error. Please check the results of your editing carefully, and use the [{WP:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any test edits or experiments. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Todor Vassilev does not yet indicate why he is significant enough to warrant an encyclopaedia article. I am not deleting the article yet, in order to allow you a chance to add such information. However, if you do not indicate why he is significant very soon then it is likely that the article will be deleted. Simply being a businessman is not enough. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Todor Vassilev

A tag has been placed on Todor Vassilev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010 (continued)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Todor Vassilev, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. You have now created this article three times. Please do not create it again unless you can address the issues which led to its deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Todor Hristov Vassilev

Template:Todor Hristov Vassilev has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Todor Vassilev

I have nominated Todor Vassilev, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todor Vassilev. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RL0919 (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]