User talk:Sillygrin

Welcome!

Hello, Sillygrin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Joelito (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock}

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing.
You were blocked by Samuel Blanning for the following reason 
(see  our blocking policy): 
Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used 
by "Peaking at 1871 at 531". The reason given for Peaking at 1871 
at 531's block is: "vandalism".
Your IP address is 202.156.6.54.

It seems to be possible to block unlogged-in users from a certain IP address without blocking logged-in users from the same address; pls consider this type of block with IP addresses with many users.

Hey -- I checked, and all autoblocks from that block have already been undone, so you should be okay to edit. Mango juice^talk 14:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aiden's comments on talk:evolution

Recently Aiden posted yet another attempt to characterise the evolution article as NPOV. I tried out the idea of moving off topic and pointless discussion to talk pages and moved it to Aiden's talk page. Aiden reverted the move claiming that it was "censorship". The post is now developing into a nice little time waster on the evolution talk page. Not sure what conclusions to draw. Perhaps I did this too early. Perhaps Aiden is unreasonable. Perhaps I am. Never the less its an interesting little piece of empirical evidence to consider when thinking of the off topic posting problem. Barnaby dawson 17:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thanks, always good to know my edits aren't hated by everybody.

As to my comment on science and faith: it was a short comment on a topic on which entire volumes have been written, so I hope you can excuse my rather ignorant statement. From the most liberal point of view (of which John Paul II is a good example) I agree with you that science does not contradict religious faith (as science must be agnostic on the existence of God). However, read John Paul II letter about evolution. It is written in an excellent manner: it shows that evolution is the best theory we have, but still manages to somehow indicate that the Catholic Church was right all the way through the conflict.--Roland Deschain 03:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hated by everybody - bear in mind that people generally only reply when they don't like what you've written. if they like it (or don't care!!!), they don't object.

I read the letter a while ago. Catholic Church was right all the way through the conflict: the Catholic Church didn't really have a position, other than:

1. evolution is an issue for science, and is outside the competence of the Church (hence the deliberate vagueness)
2. Catholics should therefore take their own positions, provided that they recognise i) the existence of God, ii) original sin, iii) and the existence of souls.
3. points i), ii) and iii) are outside the competence of science.

I hope you can excuse...: the whole debate is dominated by the Dawkinite/Dembskiite views. most people don't realise that there are other tenable positions.

JPII liberal: :-D !!! I like him a lot. he really messes with some of these categories/sterotypes.

Sillygrin 05:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:32Ppot.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:32Ppot.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sibu 3.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sibu 3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:17, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Schottbot.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Schottbot.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sweetlip.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sweetlip.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Sibu_2.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Sibu_2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 00:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parakeet.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parakeet.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 20:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]