User talk:Sillygostly/Ar3

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 01:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and you were right about the Wii version. If you'd like to re-add the information, feel free to. There are four sources you can use in my post here. Cheers, and sorry about this whole inconvenience. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 02:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, happy to help. My main goal was to try to avoid aggression and to keep everything friendly, so that we can settle this nice and easy. Anyway, it should be ok now. I'll also leave a note on his talk page about politeness. Oh, and one more thing; try to keep WP:3RR in mind next time, ok? Otherwise it gets problematic, as editors with good intentions sometimes get sucked in. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 02:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately. :) See ya around, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 02:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I left a few comments around; meanwhile, thank you for staying civil while dealing to him, and I'm sorry about his calling you "kid" and everything; that isn't fair. Thanks for keeping a cool head. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 04:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pectus Excavatum

Ha, I have a dent too! It's pretty minor though I think. I don't think I've met anyone else with one. I had no idea there was all that information on it. Nanobri (talk) 06:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JAF, eh?

Guy does good work, but man, what a dick. Congrats on (mostly) keeping your head cool in the whole Spore thing. - JNighthawk (talk) 07:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, he just edited the article for Red Faction: Guerrilla. I'm just hoping he doesn't try to get into an edit war with me about it :-) - JNighthawk (talk) 07:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. My only issue with using a quarterly identifier is that different companies use different fiscal quarters, so we'd have to identify what exactly THQ's fiscal calendar is in the article. Meh. I don't have enough of an opinion to change it one way or the other, I just wanted to fix the wrong information. - JNighthawk (talk) 08:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Template:Sim series. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 16:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Sims 2 Stuff Pack page

I noticed that there has been a major clean-up of the Holiday Party Pack on the stuff packs page. While it is appreciated, why did you remove the box art and a huge chunk of information? Since its release history is more complicated than the other stuff packs, I think it warrants the longer explanation. --Funnykidrian (talk) 05:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dial 'N' for Nerder

"Bart and Lisa are wracked with guilt when their prank goes terribly wrong they think they’re responsible for the accidental death of Martin Prince." As said, the press release clearly states that Martin dies (whether that actually happens or not). Gran² 11:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Odds are that he won't die, but that is what the press release says and stating otherwise would be POV. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 15:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're reading it in a different way, because the way I see it, Martin has been killed (probably not even by them) and Bart and Lisa think they're responsible. Gran² 07:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Meanwhile, Bart and Lisa go bike-riding in Springfield National Park, where they run into Martin Prince and play a prank on him. Bart and Lisa are wracked with guilt when their prank goes terribly wrong they think they're responsible for the accidental death of Martin Prince."

I interpret that as meaning he dies and they think they did it. Either way, we'll find out in a few weeks, then it won't matter, but for now we should leave it as it is. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 23:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Scorpion, the press release says he's dead and Bart and Lisa think they're responsible, not that they think he died, and note you have reverted me at least three times, I'm not going to revert you again, but I think you should discuss rather than continue to revert. The Dominator (talk) 23:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a message on the talk page of the article. The Dominator (talk) 23:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spore Creatures

Please refrain from further blanking-and-redirect of Spore Creatures. If you believe the article is inappropriate, you are free to nominate the article for deletion by following WP:AFD. However, blanking-and-redirecting the page is considered vandalism and may result in a block. --Yamla (talk) 15:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help at Spore (video game)

I've proposed a vote on the terminology debate at Talk:Spore (video game). JAF1970 wants to close it but I don't think all the major players in the discussion have cast their vote. Would you care to add your vote on the matter? Nanobri (talk) 18:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More on Spore

Thanks, I agree that JAF has been kind of ~~asinine (read: an ass)~~ difficult about the whole deal. I've posted a new comment regarding the matter of whether there really is a consensus or not. Dansiman (talk|Contribs) 16:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That will do

Please stop adding those Australian ratings to game related articles, they are better off without them. (This is what I called your "spam".) Besuto (talk) 22:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jonah Falcon

I declined the speedy because he actually was the subject of the article in Rolling Stone, so it easily passes the "asserts notability" test, and {{db-bio}} doesn't apply. You could take it to WP:AfD. Toddst1 (talk) 02:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's a strange article, but the article has to assert notability notability to not be speedied. Rolling Stone is WP:Reliable. Not sure how I'll weigh in on AfD. Toddst1 (talk) 03:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Morbid Curiosity

LOL, thanks, I needed that. :) Dansiman (talk|Contribs) 18:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison section of The Sims (video game series)

How is the "Comparison" section unencyclopedic and poorly written?. Mythdon (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Sims

The Sims

Hello, I have recognised your contributions to a The Sims related article. There is a WikiProject for the matenince of The Sims related articles.

If you would like to join the WikiProject add a WikiProject Sims Userbox. Also add your name to this list.

The WikiProject page is located at Wikipedia:WikiProject Sims.The SimsWikipedia:WikiProject SimsTemplate:WikiProject The SimsThe Sims articles

 S.T.H. ^{( P/T/C )}  21:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FreeTime creature

Genie is a NPC creature like Grim Reaper, and Zombie is the FreeTime playable creature without University. See Talk:The Sims 2#Zombie in FreeTime -- Iblis Trigger (talk) 07:48, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MySims (PC)

I noticed you merged the PC version of the game to the original page. I would like to argue against this decision.

-It is a game of itself. Even if you believe it to be nearly the same as the Wii version, I'd like a source that says that. MySims for PC will include many enhancements, not to mention the ability to play online. This is no minor release. This is a fairly major release, the type that deserves an article. How can MySims Kingdom, and MySims Party, which is pretty much a blank article, get an article, but MySims PC not? That does not seem reasonable.

Thanks. Johnnywalterboy (talk) 06:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Re: MySims

Hmmm... I see what you are saying now. It would be easier for readers. I know Wikipedia is not a game guide, but it IS a knowledge base. I;m still trying to deal with the orphaned screenshot that was on that page, I think I'll just add it to the MySims PC Section of MySims. Thanks! Good to clear this up! Johnnywalterboy (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Vinylg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Vinylg.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]