User talk:Silicone barbie
Silicone barbie, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Silicone barbie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC) |
RHOA Tables
[edit]Please leave the order of housewives as they are. First season housewives start at the top and the new housewives to the bottom, each in order of first season. Zhyboo (talk) 23:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Also don't add any information, unless officially confirmed. Zhyboo (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit]
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. livelikemusic talk! 01:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Real Housewives of Orange County. I don't know how many times you have to be told to stop adding information that is not confirmed; consider this your final warning on this issue. livelikemusic talk! 00:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Livelikemusic: I'm struggling to understand why did you use this template and warning. I reviewed his edits and those in my opinion don't constitute vandalism. And you yourself admit that it is an unsourced situation. If anything that would be disruptive editing which is not vandalism. But I don't think that was disruptive editing either. I'm puzzled why he got blocked when you didn't even try to inform him previously what was he doing wrong in your opinion, you just posted unrelated warnings. A summary edit is not a proper way to inform an editor. WP:ES states that "An edit summary is a brief explanation of an edit to a Wikipedia page... this helps others to understand the intention of your edit." Maybe he didn't even have the page in his watch list or wasn't watching his watchlist. Thinker78 (talk) 06:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
March 2017
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 19:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Silicone barbie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didnt do anything wrong, I included confirmed information into my edits. everything i edited into the Housewives of Orange County has been confirmed, why the fuck have I been blocked?Silicone barbie (talk) 20:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Let's take your latest edits. I don't see any reference cited for those changes. For example, "A new woman named Peggy has also been spotted filming as well." - spotted by whom? Reports who? How can our readers verify that? Huon (talk) 20:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Silicone barbie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I edited the cast in general and added that all women from last season have been confirmed, season 12 has been confirmed so why delete all that if it has been confirmed prior to me making any edits. As for the Peggy section I dont know how to add something frm twitter to here but it has been seen so there you go. All my edits that have actually had reason/links/description have always been deleted. Its bullshit.
Decline reason:
You have to provide citations (see WP:CITE) using reliable sources (WP:RS) for all of your edits. Twitter is not a reliable source. If this is your only source, you should not be adding that information. Yamla (talk) 01:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Silicone barbie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
it is a reliable source when there are clear pictures. Why should I provide citations when everything included had been confirmed on that page? I just added it to the cast slot. Doesnt make sense COMPLETE BULLSHIT
Decline reason:
Zero evidence that you understand what was wrong with your edits, or that you have read the relevant policies on reliable sources. If you continue adding unsourced material when this block expires, you will likely be blocked indefinitely. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Once again, you did not provide a source at all for this edit. In your earlier unblock request, you stated you had a twitter source. I've pointed out that twitter wouldn't be a reliable source, even if you had included it. Which you hadn't. So far, you are showing no evidence you have read and understood WP:CITE and WP:RS. You are likely to see your block extended to ensure you take the time to read and understand these core policies. --Yamla (talk) 02:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. livelikemusic talk! 01:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve The Real Housewives of Atlanta (season 10)
[edit]Hi, I'm Boleyn. Silicone barbie, thanks for creating The Real Housewives of Atlanta (season 10)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for several issues, and is in danger of being redirected/deleted unless sources are added to verify its information and show it meets WP:GNG.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Boleyn (talk) 07:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Silicone barbie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)