User talk:Sigsmund

Welcome

Hello, Sigsmund, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! LuckyLouie (talk) 14:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Die Glocke

Unfortunately, comments posted on webnews pages are not considered verifiable reliable sources. The newspaper site you cited includes a disclaimer (in Polish) that specifies that "comments are personal opinions of users" and not subject to editorial oversight. Also, the comments appear to be a transcription of a conversation regarding rumored German atomic research in the Wenceslas mine area, and do not bear any direct relation to the subject of the article. We can only include "speculation" published by reliable sources. We are not permitted to synthesize material to create our own unique or novel speculative conclusions. - LuckyLouie (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can "communicate" at the article Talk page, here. - LuckyLouie (talk) 03:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Thorium

The "Thorium Bomb" section you added appears to contain too much speculation and not enough verification, so I have removed it and started a discussion on the talk page: Talk:Thorium#Thorium_bomb.3F I encourage you to comment there if you have more information/references. -- Limulus (talk) 18:45, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]