User talk:ShugSty

ShugSty, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi ShugSty! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Allen McKnight, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 10:50, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Allen McKnight, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:21, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul McGugan

The article Paul McGugan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul McGugan

The article Paul McGugan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gold Standard 03:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Gold Standard. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Paul McGugan, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Gold Standard 03:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Paul McGugan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Arctic Kangaroo 03:42, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lex Baillie. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 17:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul McGugan

The article Paul McGugan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established per WP:GNG. Most of the references contain little more than a passing mention of the subject. No significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gold Standard 04:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 17:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sandy Jardine

Thanks for your edits. If we are able to expand the text of the article by at least 5x from where it was yesterday, it would be eligible for WP:DYK. I think his winning the SFWA player of the year award at 37 would be a good hook for that (or, alternatively, being named in the 1974 World Cup team of the tournament). Jmorrison230582 (talk) 16:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

I would appreciate it if you a) didn't go around harassing me by undoing my edits and b) didn't violate WP:BLP in doing so. The material (unrefernced and about a BLP) has been challenged and removed; it should NOT be restored unless accompanied with a reliable source to verify it. Giant Snowman 12:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(oh dear - I'm on the naughty step... again!)

Response to finally providing a citation for Steve Purdy stats;

Thank you! Giant Snowman 12:43, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I get told off for being for being naughty, but at least I get a "thank you" when i'm good! :)

Honours

Please ensure the honours list is fully referenced before removing from User:Macosal/BLP e.g. Dominique Da Silva. Giant Snowman 18:32, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Martin O'Neill

I don't know if you're a new contributor or an established one; I wanted to stop by and say thanks for helping us out. See ya' round Tiderolls 12:50, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Honours

Hey ShugSty, Just wanted to thank you for all the good work on the Macosal/BLP list. I've been adding references to the honours sections of the players as well and appreciate like-minded editors who try to add references first before deleting Wiki material. Keep up the good work and hopefully we will soon have all the honours referenced rather than deleted! Cheers. Rupert1904 (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I got into one of those arguments myself about the whole thing and that's how I ended up working on that list haha. It's a shame that so few editors are willing to add the references as often times all it takes is a quick look at Soccerway or the club's website to find the proper references. It's great to know though that at least I'm not the only one out there though. Please let me know if you ever need help finding references for the obscure honours or anything else. I'll be more than happy to help you. Rupert1904 (talk) 18:21, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 2 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Sergiu Buș page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Danny McGrain

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Danny McGrain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of Celtic F.C. (1994-present)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of History of Celtic F.C. (1994-present), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.wiki2.org/wiki/History_of_Celtic_F.C..

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Danny McGrain

The article Danny McGrain you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Danny McGrain for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 21:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well what a waste of effing time THAT turned out to be. I dunno why I bothered (and I won't again). I'm not really surprised the article got failed for GA, but I did hope for more in depth analysis and pointers on how to IMPROVE the article other than being told the lead was too long. Ah, well............ ShugSty (talk) 00:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hun/sectarian

Personally I agree that the notion of the use of the term "hun" is sectarian is dubious but there has been long and tedious discussion of this at the talk page so you must achieve consensus before changing the wording. Please read WP:BRD if you are not familiar with it. Continuously reverting without consensus will be viewed as warring so please either leave the matter or engage on the talk page. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flybe

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Flybe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amido Baldé

Hi there, from Portugal,

only wanted to contribute too in this article, I see that it is not possible, sorry for the inconvenience. However, two questions before we part wiki-ways: 1 - why some clubs are allowed to be written in full, and others are not (Hapoel)? 2 - why the constant repetitions of total appearances for a club in storyline? I thought that's what the charts were for. Last but not least, I tried to diminish the presence of the word "Baldé" in the storyline, after the first instance "he" or "the player" suffices, surely I'm not worsening the article by doing that, I think (in a related approach, I don't think we have to say "appearances" all the time).

Attentively (I still made a minor adjustments to the ref you added for his Vitória debut, maybe you'll allow that to stay) --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:00, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick and kind reply. By "constant", I meant you added the number of games he played for Celtic and Hapoel, adding a ref which is only a link (Soccerway) whilst repeating what is already present in the charts below (X games/Y goals). Also, I am a fan of writing the names in full in the first instance (wikilink) so, for coherence purposes, I have unpiped them all (except Hapoel, which should be presented as "Hapoel" Tel-Aviv FC" not "Hapoel Tel-Aviv" in the first instance, because I see you will revert me). Cheers --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:59, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newsflash: Soccerway is wrong, he did not play in SIX Taça de Portugal games for Vitória, but SEVEN. Both www.zerozero.pt (OK, this one is user-generated, i'll give you that) and www.foradejogo.net (this one is not) are Portuguese like him and attest to that. Plus, I think it's neater to avoid repeating the infobox, so I have reinstated the bit with his overall total for Vitória instead of only the leagues games (and Soccerway, albeit with only 99,99999999999% of accuracy due to the cup games discrepancy, still sources it so I have not damaged your work I think).

Happy start of week --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not 100% sure about this, but I believe the accessdates of references are to stay permanent (that date serves to show when was the source was retrieved from the web), you only alter the update. Keep up the good work --84.90.219.128 (talk) 00:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Celticfc100.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Celticfc100.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 09:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CelticCrest1977.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CelticCrest1977.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, ShugSty. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 19:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 19:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thelmadatter/Karamoko Kader Dembele

Hi! We are students of a Wikipedia group learning. We are not native english speakers, and we want to know your opnion about our article of the youn player Karamoko Dembele.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jort Fl (talk • contribs) 17:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ShugSty. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fraser Forster

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fraser Forster you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fraser Forster

The article Fraser Forster you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fraser Forster for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Davie Provan - squad photo (Celtic) 1984.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Davie Provan - squad photo (Celtic) 1984.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic F.C. Under-20s and Academy copyright problem

Some of the material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.scottish-football-historical-archive.co.uk/leagues.htm. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked your work and done a little more paraphrasing. If you could read it over and make sure I have not changed the meaning, that would be perfect. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Celtic F.C. in European football

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Celtic F.C. in European football you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 23:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Celtic F.C. in European football

The article Celtic F.C. in European football you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Celtic F.C. in European football for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 05:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Celtic F.C. players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bhoys from Seville

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Bhoys from Seville you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComputerJA -- ComputerJA (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Bhoys from Seville

The article The Bhoys from Seville you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Bhoys from Seville for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ComputerJA -- ComputerJA (talk) 17:02, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Barnstar

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Hi, congratulations for promoting The Bhoys from Seville to Good Article status! Your work in Celtic F.C.-related articles is greatly appreciated. It was a pleasure working with you. Cheers! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 17:04, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, not sure how many GAs you have, but I'd highly encourage you to take up a review sometime in the near future. I feel you have a good grasp of what it takes to promote a GA. We have a lot of backlog now and your review would be greatly appreciated. I usually try to do at least 3 reviews for every GA I nominate, but 1 for 1 is a good start! I'll be happy to take a look at one of your reviews if you ever need me. Thanks! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 17:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Davie Provan - squad photo (Celtic) 1984.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Davie Provan - squad photo (Celtic) 1984.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Davie Provan free kick 1985 Cup Final.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Davie Provan free kick 1985 Cup Final.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯ xplicit 00:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Celtic F.C. players FLC

Hi, ShugSty. For any article that goes through FAC or FLC, there needs to be a consensus for promotion among the reviewers, meaning that the article has received sufficient support during the process. In the (nearly) three months that this list was at FLC, it didn't attract any declared support, so us closers can't say that a consensus existed. I gave this FLC a relatively long run in an attempt to let the list attract some attention from the community, but sometimes pages get overlooked for whatever reason, and we can't leave candidates open indefinitely. Since it didn't look like there would be a consensus any time soon, I felt it would be best to close the list. You may renominate it when you wish, and I have a couple pieces of advice to help you. First, take a look at the questions you faced regarding source reliability; I'm not sure about FitbaStats or Vale of Leven myself, and I noticed a couple refs to a book published by Lulu, a self-publishing company. If reviewers see questions about sourcing, that can discourage them from digging into a given article; perhaps you could find higher-quality sources to replace some of these cites. Second, try your hand at reviewing others' lists. If people see you helping to move their lists through the process, they may take a look at your work. I wish you the best of luck with a potential second nomination, if you decide to go for it. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arveladze fee

Hey, if you're interested, I put a bit on the talk page of the football records article about this a while back. Didn't feel brave enough to remove the entry tho! You may be aware of all that already. Crowsus (talk) 12:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ShugSty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Lincoln Red Imps 1–0 Celtic. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I can see the strength of your convictions on this so I am going to back away from this. But I will say that what you said about me on your first edit description is not appropriate for Wikipedia as it is a violation of WP:NPA. I am not going to take this particular one to ANI however I would kindly ask you not to say something like that again please. Regards. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 13:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TFL notification

Hi, ShugSty. I'm just posting to let you know that Timeline of Scottish football – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 13. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1987 Scottish League Cup Final, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peter Nicholas and John Hewitt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ShugSty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celticfc100.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Celticfc100.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Celtic F.C. (1994–present), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hungarian, Ross County and St Mirren. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of Scottish football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Highland League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jimmy McGrory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International football.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Celtic F.C. managers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Mirren.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for non-free content policy violations and edit warring, as you did at List of Celtic F.C. players.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShugSty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing against by "block" as it without foundation: The reason given for my blocking appears to be my edits at List of Celtic F.C. players, where I had reverted several disruptive edits where material had been removed without valid reason. To be blocked abruptly without any genuine reason or warning appears disproportionate, and indeed an abuse of power (I note that the admin who has blocked me is the perpetrator of the disruptive edits at the article in question. However, I have seen how such disputes with the great & the good here have played out with other editors, so I am not holding my breathe on a positive (if any) response from you. ShugSty (talk) 12:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were violating WP:COPYRIGHT, WP:FAIRUSE, and WP:EW. The block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 13:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Replaceable fair use File:Alec McNair (1910 portrait).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alec McNair (1910 portrait).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]