Jump to content

User talk:RYSHR

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Shrawanroy)

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Shrawanroy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Supdiop (talk) 15:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Art of Being Human

[edit]

Template:The Art of Being Human has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nisha Sharma
added a link pointing to Nepali
Pratibha Ray
added a link pointing to Nepali
Sunil Pokharel
added a link pointing to Nepali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Shrawanroy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Agniko Katha) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Agniko Katha, Shrawanroy!

Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have removed the WP:COPYVIO from the first paragraph: it had been copied verabtim from [1]. Please also note that as per WP:COPYQUOTE, 'extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited.' I have therefore removed the second and third and third paragraphs also, which consisted entirely of quotations. Note that you are free to rephrase the material and replace it, but it needs to be fundamentally rewritten into your own words. Please see WP:CLOP for further information on this. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 13:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Shrawanroy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content you included in the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/14738833.Anuja_Ghosh/blog or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Taj Mahal & My Love for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Taj Mahal & My Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Taj Mahal & My Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:48, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suman Pokhrel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Every Morning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Films Played by Asha Parekh

[edit]

Template:Films Played by Asha Parekh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Kailash29792 (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2001 in literature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Shamsur Rahman
2010 in literature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ju

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. Thank you, DPL bot. Shrawanroy (talk) 04:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Shrawanroy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chitra Mudgal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chenai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Master Mitrasen article renaming

[edit]

You recently moved Master Mitrasen Thapa Magar to Wikipedia:Mitrasen citing "Wikipedia guideline" - presumably MOS:HON regarding honorifics. Unfortunately you moved the article out of the article namespace into the Wikipedia: namespace, which seemed inappropriate. There is a discussion to move it back to article namespace, although not necessarily to the old title. You may wish to add comment at Wikipedia talk:Mitrasen#Requested move 2 February 2019. Dl2000 (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhanubhakta Acharya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepalese language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Odia-language authors

[edit]

Hello, RYSHR,

Thanks for creating List of Odia-language authors! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Internal links.

[edit]

Hello. I reverted the internal links you added. We should use them very sparingly, normally on first reference. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Nepali translators

[edit]

Hello, RYSHR,

Thanks for creating List of Nepali translators! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flag

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your work on Nepal-related articles. Please note that flags are generally not included in infoboxes, with some exceptions granted for sportspeople. Tony (talk) 12:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of Nepalese poets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is pretty much a duplicate of List of Nepali poets. What reason is there to have a separate article?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


....................

Thank you for your concern, noq.

Yes, this article seems a duplicate of List of Nepali poets at this moment, but it is not.

Because, List of Nepali poets consists of poets who write in Nepali language who may either be of Nepali nationality or any other.

Where as, List of Nepalese poets consists of poets of Nepali nationality who write in any of 123 languages spoken and/or written in Nepal or, even in other languages (eg. English). However, it have to be extended yet.

In conclusion, List of Nepali poets refers to - poets who write in Nepali language For example; Rajendra Bhandari, Kamala Sankrityayan, Iman Xin Chemjong are Nepali language writers/poets form India and List of Nepalese poets refers to - poets with Nepali nationality who write in any languages spoken in Nepal For example; Ganesh Lal Shrestha, Siddhidas Mahaju are Nepali poets who write in Nepalbhasha.

In other example, these lists are like List of Spanish-language authors and List of Spanish women writers

More poets who write in other languages to be included. It takes time.

Hope, this clarify your concern.

Thus this article should not be deleted.

RYSHR (talk) 03:38, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of translators of William Shakespeare, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RYSHR, Greetings. Pls note that stand alone lists do need independent, reliable sources to support the content claimed - see Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists. Once you have provided the inline citations (see referencing for info and instructions) then resubmit the draft for review. thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
List of translators of William Shakespeare, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Agam Singh Giri

[edit]

Hello RYSHR,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Agam Singh Giri for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

HagennosTalk 04:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fever (poem) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fever (poem) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fever (poem) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 15:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tree (poem) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tree (poem) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tree (poem) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 15:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Children (poem) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Children (poem) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children (poem) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talkcontribs) 15:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of You are, as You are for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article You are, as You are is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You are, as You are until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool TALK  09:58, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heat (poem) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heat (poem) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heat (poem) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool TALK  10:00, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Every Morning (poem) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Every Morning (poem) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Morning (poem) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool TALK  10:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of A Story of the Setting Sun and The Moon for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Story of the Setting Sun and The Moon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Story of the Setting Sun and The Moon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool TALK  10:03, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shoonya Mutuko Dhadkanbhitra for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shoonya Mutuko Dhadkanbhitra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoonya Mutuko Dhadkanbhitra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool TALK  10:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manpareka Kehi Kavita for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manpareka Kehi Kavita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manpareka Kehi Kavita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool TALK  10:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aandhibehari for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aandhibehari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aandhibehari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool TALK  10:31, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Books by Suman Pokhrel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:37, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Suman Pokhrel

[edit]

Template:Suman Pokhrel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Usedtobecool TALK  08:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your contributions seem to be related to Suman Pokhrel and related subjects. Most of those edits give the impression of an intent to use Wikipedia to promote him. Many of your article creations were on non-notable subjects, also related to Suman Pokhrel. I am not aware of any disclosures you have made regarding your conflicts of interests. Please declare your connections to the subjects you have contributed to; specifically, please do not make any further edits before you answer whether you are being paid to promote someone/something via wikipedia. I will drop a templated message regarding paid editing which will have all the links on informations and instructions on how to handle your COI/PAID statuses. I strongly advise you to read those and take necessary steps before you continue to edit. Please also read WP:V and WP:RS. Continuing to add material cited with inappropriate, non-reliable sources, or creating articles on non-notable subjects are serious long-term issues with your edits, as far as I can tell, and persistence with these could get you blocked or banned. Regards! Usedtobecool TALK  10:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]
Information icon

Hello RYSHR. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RYSHR. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RYSHR|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Usedtobecool TALK  10:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bibliographies of Nepalese writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Poetry by Suman Pokhrel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:36, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nepalese books by writers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalpna Singh-Chitnis for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalpna Singh-Chitnis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalpna Singh-Chitnis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

- RichT|C|E-Mail 11:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:People from Biratnagar

[edit]

Template:People from Biratnagar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]