User talk:ShortTermer

Eidt warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Princess Leia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Thank you. Sarty72 (talk) 01:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Subterfuge

Can you guys stop redirecting Yellow Subterfuge? At this point its not too soon cause it airs in 2 days and i will expand it after it airs. Thanks. Koala15 (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppett?

It is obvious from your edit history and pattern that you are also posting with the account 2602:306:37EB:49E0:477:2801:FC7D:21E2. you better take a look at WP:SOCK and pay close attention to the "Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts" section because this can get you banned. I have seen at least 3 different accounts that you post under. I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't know this information but if it continues, I WILL report you and have you banned. Sarty72 (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you just don't learn

I warned you back on December 11, 2013 to stop using sock puppets and yet you continue to do so with the IP:2602:306:37EB:49E0:9D47:5B3:EBCA:B7D6. Well as I told you then, that was your only warning. I am now opening a sock puppet investigation against you and there is a good chance of you being blocked. Don't say I didn't warn you

January 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Leonard Nimoy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Please use the most specific category (Category:Jewish American male actors) when categorizing actors. Admr Boltz 06:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leonard Nimoy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please use the most specific category possible. Admr Boltz 06:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Groucho Marx. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please STOP changing categories with out consensus. Admr Boltz 06:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of CastellanetaFan (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]