User talk:Sarty72

December 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nathan Fillion. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Please arrive on one location for your discussion, refrain from any further reverting and get this matter resolved. Your slow edit warring is disrupting this article and all the other Firefly-related articles where it's taking place. --Drmargi (talk) 14:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I don't want to be blocked.

I beg you and everyone else please forgive me. I was just trying to alter a category on certain actors I loved as the category "Jewish American actors" sounded better without the edition of "male". And I guess I was getting into an edit war with Edenc1, I guess my own personal preferences do not apply to the policies of the site and I should know it by now. I give an sincere apology and hope I can be understood. And if you want I can pass this apology to Edenc1 as well. --ShortTermer (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HIVE post

Hi there, saw your note on the HIVE article, please note that 2 unregistered users (or one using multiple IPs) were routinely changing my edits with no explanation. One of them explained, after several reverts, that the issue was with my source, so rather than reverting the edit I re-did it with a Wikipedia acceptable public source. I did not simply revert it. No one seems to have an issue with it now that the source has been changed. No edit war was intended, this worked out, as far as I can tell, as intended with us collaborating to correct an issue.JamesG5 (talk) 20:34, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noted that you changed the HIVE text again. I reverted it not because of the changes in text but because of the change you made to the reference link. As mentioned, it was pointed out to me that the IMDB is not an accepted source so I redid it to an acceptable one. The text you changed is another discussion, but please leave the acceptable source link.JamesG5 (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Blood In Blood Out because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Elizium23 (talk) 02:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Cristin Milioti

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cristin Milioti. Musdan77 (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]