User talk:Shooboo23

November 2024

Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Samuel Hoare, 1st Viscount Templewood have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please stop your changes. You have previously been told to get consensus before continuing. You have ignored that, and ignored my previous message. Your behaviour is disruptive. DuncanHill (talk) 20:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not disruptive at all. makes 0 sense to have 'secretary of state' in front of some cabinet roles and just 'home secretary' instead of 'secretary of state for the home department' only on that department. Shooboo23 (talk) 20:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does make sense because that is how the English language works. You need to stop. DuncanHill (talk) 20:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

buddy the english language has nothing to do with this. my edits are conforming with other pages and making wikipedia a more logical encyclopedia. your opinion has no relevance and it is frankly depressing that you feel the need to go through every single one of my edits to revert it. Shooboo23 (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to David Maxwell Fyfe, 1st Earl of Kilmuir. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. The title 'secretary of state for justice' did not exist until 2007 so cannot be used for someone who died in 1967. Erp (talk) 03:51, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a notice

STOP HARASSING MY FUCKING PAGE.

KIND REGARDS UNITYGUARD Unityguard (talk) 21:07, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Shooboo23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Erp (talk) 03:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Foreign Secretary" or the longer title discussion

I've started a discussion on whether to use "Foreign Secretary" or the longer title in infoboxes at Talk:Foreign_Secretary Erp (talk) 15:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very thoughtful Shooboo23 (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello Shooboo23. Can you explain your edit here? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Cambial — foliar❧ 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 22:16, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]