User talk:Shlishke
Buzz Aldrin
[edit]Hi there
I saw your comments on Aldrin's page and have done my best to answer some of your queries - page refs etc. Re your query about the "too big an ego" quote from Hansen - I read through Chap 25 again which covers the 'first out' issue in great detail, and can't find that exact quote. The nearest thing is that Armstrong "had no ego" which is actually a quote from Chris Kraft in an interview with James Hansen. Not sure where to take that from here, but no doubt somebody else will chip in. I'll add a ref tag to the quote. UPDATE: just realised there's already a ref there, so a ref tag wouldn't make sense.
Cheers, Whoosher 10:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Cortot & Mannes
[edit]Hm, we probably know each other by our non-Wikipedia names (although I used to love shlishkes, before I cared about my weight). I attended Mannes 1975-79, and have taught in the Extension Division since 1982. I was deriving that list of faculty from people I knew who were teaching when I attended, and from going through old Mannes catalogs. I don't have access to them at the moment, but indeed, Cortot is listed on the faculty (admitedly in a "Master class" situation) around 1922. A lot of refugees taught there in the war years (I believe Szell is among them). I'll add more as time permits. kosboot (talk) 23:54, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, yes we know each other although I've forgotten what you look like. My pic is on my blog: http://raremusic.wordpress.com - go to the "about" page (soon to change). Getting that PhD at CUNY was a real killer. Even at the time I'm convinced they just want the money - seems like few other institutions treat the students with such disregard. I corrected the citation in the Shlishkes article -- but it was funny to see "Kiryas, Joel" as a name. :) So "Braham" is a Jewish name? -- kosboot (talk) 14:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Leonardo
[edit]The "whole perspective thing" is where it is because the main article on Leonardo is extremely long. There is no room in it to discuss perspective in detail. Leonardo was first and foremost a painter, so his painting is dealt with in that article in about as much detail as space will allow, which means trying to cover briefly as many as possible of his 15 most significant works. Perspective is just one of the scientific studies that he applied to painting. Also anatomy, botany, geology etc. Let me put it in a different way- if Leonardo was Piero della Francesca, then a section headed Perspective would probably feature in a biography, regardless of how many pages it took up. But while his study and application of it is significant, Leonardo was not the pioneer of linear perspective. So it jjust ttakes its place ammong hhis other fields of ennquiry.
Amandajm (talk) 01:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]Hi, nice to make your acquaintance. Looking at your music interests, I wonder if you've run across the work of my friend Jeannie Guerrero? She has published on multiple-perspective art and its influence on Luigi Nono and on Francesco (Landini)'s music, but not on perspective and Medieval music. Thanks for the contributions! Best, -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
time/meter
[edit]excellent excursus on time and meter- should be in the article on musical meter (assuming there is one), not buried in discussion page to article on "music in unusual time signatures"
l8r —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.61.2 (talk) 04:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I can certainly keep an eye on it, and may well dive in. You should also contact User:Dsmdgold , not very active currently, but who has done most of the illuminated Ms stuff we have, & is certainly knowledgeable. Johnbod (talk) 19:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Your note
[edit]Hi Shlishke, that image, as described in its image page, is a screenshot of the table in the Wikipedia article The War Against the Jews, which is a book by Lucy Dawidowicz. Thanks, Crum375 (talk) 11:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your message, and thank you also for writing the bibliographies article. I hadn't been aware it existed but now that I've added it to the template, it will be far more visible. There was some talk of creating a Hamlet Bibliography article (if you see what I mean) so one possibility to consider is that your article could evolve into that. Best wishes. AndyJones (talk) 08:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Oy, to be associated with an apostate. But thanks for the note. :) kosboot (talk) 08:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
I have approved you for use of AWB. Good luck! ScarianCall me Pat 16:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Cordier circular canon.gif
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Cordier circular canon.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Peer review idea
[edit]Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.
There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).
If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your fast response and for agreeing to help. The archive for this month is at Wikipedia:Peer review/March 2008, last month is at Wikipedia:Peer review/February 2008, and so on. My idea was that the volunteers could do one or two a month, so whenever is fine - if everyone tried to do one right now and then waited a month, we would have a big backlog of reviews with no responses, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of High Culture | |
| for making Eye Music interesting Vajrayosidbhagesuvijahara (talk) 06:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC) |
Augenmusik
[edit]Very fine indeed! Good work! I was going to recommend that you also ask Myke Cuthbert to have a look, but I see he's been on the talk page. Glad you got the Baude Cordier, Marenzio, Josquin, and some of the moderns like Crumb. I enjoyed the article; it's well-written and illustrated. I was about to pick through my three volumes of Einstein (coincidentally stacked up right next to me -- I was about to start working on madrigal (music) again) -- but I see you've used those as well. Hey, keep up the good work, and were you here I'd buy you a pint. :) Best, Antandrus (talk) 14:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- Btw -- not sure if I ever mentioned how much I'm enjoying seeing the article progress. It's really great; I hope to be able to make some contributions this summer (little things to a great article). Best, -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 21:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Image linking
[edit]I don't really understand it either tbh. I'm going to have a hunt around the village pump etc and see what i can find. The summation so far seems basically to be that it's not something that's been discussed before, but hopefully the village pump will let more experienced wikipedians, and critically admins, see it and have their say. I'm not hugely fussed either way. One thing I am pretty sure of is that linking to external pictures is a bad idea, because it almost certainly removes any effort to determine and demonstrate fair use. We shall see :) Ged UK (talk) 17:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Guilloche
[edit]Hi, how are you? I see you joined us recently! Welcome and good luck!
Now about the “pronunciation thingie” I’m no expert in pronunciation thingies but, Merriam Webster has this “gi-ˈlōsh”, “gē-ˈ(y)ōsh” here: [1],and a “thingie” to listen to it here: [2] , and for the other way they give , listen to that here: [3].
However, according to the guy who thought me most of what I know about this subject, the “thingie” should be something like this, “Gil-u-shay”, because of the thingie over the letter E, in the original way its correctly written (guilloché) .
Well, and the other thing about “Niels Bohr”, his mother was Jewish, that makes him a Jew, at least as far as Halacha is concerned.
Bloger (talk) 04:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
lauhgnig!
[edit]religious views of suicide
[edit]Hi,
I’m not sure what you mean, would you please care to elaborate?
Bloger (talk) 18:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- What do you mean by “backwards” , do you mean the way its put in writing , (it can be written better!) or do you mean that is a bit contradictory? If that’s what you mean, I can explain, although true one has to give ones life rather than transgress one of the three cardinal sins, its only if someone else takes your life from you if you don’t transgress, but to take one self’s life is not a option, for example if you know with certainty that you wont be able to withstand not transgressing because – let’s say - The fashion in which the forcer will take your life will be especially painful, but you are ready to take a suicide pill without pain rather then transgress, well that won’t be an option.
- BTW, what happens if someone couldn’t resist pain and transgresses, and if one needs at all to suffer severe pain (which can be harder then death in some cases, hence the capital punishment v prolonged imprisonment debate) rather then transgress, that’s a subject for itself, and should probably be added to self-sacrifice under Jewish law.
Request for Peer Review help
[edit]Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.
1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...
2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.
3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.
Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008
[edit]WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter June 2008
WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008
[edit]WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter July 2008
WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
[edit]|
The Judaism Newsletter
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||
.jpg)
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Leonardo da Vinci peer review
[edit]Hi there, I noticed your name on the list of peer review volunteers. I'd be very grateful if you'd take a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/Leonardo da Vinci/archive3. Thanks Papa November (talk) 14:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
The Judaism Newsletter
[edit]|
The Judaism Newsletter
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey, sorry you never got a response to your request for feedback on Hamlet (bibliographies). Did you still have any questions about it? If so you can always ask me on my talk page (about that article or any other), I'm always glad to try and help out. I'm going to go ahead and tag the section resolved, but definitely let me know if you need anything, or feel free to file another request. Peace, delldot talk 02:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Funistrada
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Funistrada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Not to worry. That article really piqued my interest and I've made it into an acceptable stub. Off to enjoy a bit of leftover funistrada! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 08:02, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Leonardo
[edit]- I notice your additions to the article. I will reword them slightly to do away with expressions like "by the same token".
- Naughty! Naughty! I don't think that you used the "Show preview" before you saved, or checked what you had done after you saved. Your entire edit had stretched itself for a million miles, and put itself in a box.
This is what happens if you add just one little space to the beginning of the sentence. If your edit is long enough, it will run itself right off the edge of your screen......
So you need to check after saving. The Show Preview is a very useful function.
- Given what you have written, I think perhaps we should leave the pic showing the internal organs, and make a note to indicate that it ties with what you have written.
- Or, on the other hand, do you think we should replace the pic with a really accurate drawing?
I think that the internal organs, however innacurate, is good, because it indicates a reality about Leonardo that people don't always want to accept- He was undoubtedly a genius, but that doesn't mean he always got it right!
Amandajm (talk) 09:53, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- OK! I reworded it a bit and included a direct reference to the drawing beside it. What we have now is a wiki-problem. This might seem all too obvious to you because you know your subject, however....
- The statement that lack of preservation methods probably/possibly contributed is what is labelled here a Original Research. In other words, regardless of how well you know it to be true, and what your qualifications are, you are not permitted to make that sort of explanation, unless you can back it up with a written source. It's terribly boring, and it drives people with expertise away, but that is how it is! Which means that either you or I will have to come up with some written source that can be cited.
- Also, please ignore my rather rude "edit summary". I get cross when experienced editors don't bother to look, but one makes allowances for newer editors because they often don't know what they have done to cause a formatting problem. There is a dear fellow who used to delete every single edit that I made, if the formatting wasn't right. After we'd come to verbal blows a few times we became good friends.
- Amandajm (talk) 10:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Leo and Music
[edit]According to Vasari, Leonardo had a beautiful singing voice. He created a silver lute in the shape of a horses head. It was so beautiful that Lorenzo de'Medici sent Leo as his ambassador to the court of Lud the Moor, taking the lute as a present. (I can't help wondering if it was in fact a lyre out of a goat or gazels skull which is a traditional symbol of Orpheus or Apollo). I don't know of any music that Leonardo composed. However, the portrait of a musician which is attributed to him could be one of three people, and is perhaps himself.
Lorenzo and Leonardo were the same age. I can fully understand why Lorenzo wanted Leonardo out of his way. If Vasari is to be believe, he was tall, very handsome, could perfom phenomenal feats of strengths, had a voice that charmed the birds down from the trees and was extremely entertaining. Lorenzo, on the other hand, was plain, with a nose like a ski ramp, an overbiting jaw and a grating voice. He was medium height with broad shoulders but skinny legs, (and the fashion for young men was for short tunics and hose). Leonardo wore short tunics most of his life, while Lorenzo went into longer garbs as soon as his status would allow him. Lorenzo's redeeming features were his magnificent large dark eyes and his irresistibly charming manner.
There is no way that Leonardo da Vinci would have lapped up the philosophies put forward at the Medici Academy. For a start, he was ineligible for university, being illegitimate, and never studied Greek. One would suppose that he had some grasp of church Latin. He relied all his life on primary sources rather than the written word. For all their talk about nature, this was not what the Academy was on about. I think Lorenzo saw Leonardo as his biggest rival. He sent him away, even though Leonardo had just received a very important commission. If the Adoration of the Magi had been finished, it would have been without doubt one of the supreme masterpieces of the Renaissance.
Amandajm (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Removal from PR Volunteer List
[edit]Due to extremely low editing in the project within the past six months, you have been removed from the list at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers. If you decide to return to editing Wikipedia, feel free to readd your name to this list. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
Montpelier / Dijon?
[edit]You congratulated me on my talk page for rewriting something in this area? I don't know what you're talking about. I checked my edits and still couldn't figure it out. Perhaps you got the name of the editor wrong? Cheers.DavidRF (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Randolph L. Braham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page City College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi there Shlishke! I've noticed you have yourself listed as a member of the Food and Drink Wikiproject. Unfortunately it looks like the project has been slowly sliding into inactivity except for a couple of people. That makes me a sad potato, and nobody likes a sad potato amirite?
If you'd like to turn my frown upside down, can you do two small things?
First off, go here and add {{Tick}} (
) next to your name if you're still part of the project.
Second, go to the project talkpage and participate in a discussion about how to make the project more active, and how to go about making articles in our area of interest a lot better.
You don't want to make me cry, do you? Potatoes have a lot of eyes you know. So come on, join in! :)
— The Potato Hose 18:28, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Shlishke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Shlishke. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
[edit]Hello Shlishke! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 22:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Shlishke. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Randolph L. Braham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gymnasium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |