User talk:Shiva2586

Welcome!

Hi Sir, Help me for new creation of article, please sme can do work for wikipedia are not or shall i withdraw from wikipedia... please suggest me ... am irriated by the way you all are makeing me discourage for my evevry work and stopping me from my aim to do... please guide me .. or shall i be away from wiki .. so can i stop to work for wiki ..

Hi! I'm sorry, I know this is very difficult for you, and that English is not your first language. I'd like to help, but you don't listen to advice. I'd be sorry if you left wikipedia. Two ideas: find someone who knows more English than you, ask him to help you with your edits here; or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject India, perhaps someone there can guide you. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ya sure i will make my edit in good quality. will try to give my thoughts in english in good phrases, and will try to give my article to satisfy you in good.. am good in english .. but because of tension and irritation i coudnt do my work properly .. so from now will do it sir... and help to edit a new article in name of my guru ji a legend Pandit Krishna Ballesh sir and Pandit jagannath sir... help me....

Krishna Ballesh

Hello Shiva2586,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Krishna Ballesh, may be copied from http://www.wikigrain.org/?req=Krishna+Ballesh. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 03:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC

Nameste.. this article "Krishna Ballesh" i personally contributed for wikipedia in "Krishna Ballesh" article previously and was working on also. because of some confusion on user name it was removed. so am re-constructing it again, please re- consider and help me to work on this. it will be heart-felt thanks to you. if you help me. so their is no coprights issue here, and my article was copied in http://www.wikigrain.org/?req=Krishna+Ballesh. from my work.

Hello, Shiva2586, and thank you for your contributions!

Hi MadmanBot (talk),

please keep helping me to work on this article. thanks you once again.. please give me any mark

This Indian music-related biographical article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

.. because this article about a upcomming shehnai player

and hindustani vocalist.. please encourage me for my work..................

Speedy deletion nomination of Krishna Ballesh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Krishna Ballesh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MER-C 08:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. As you know, the page which you keep on re-creating has been the subject of a discussion, in which consensus was decided that the subject does not satisfy Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. Trying to unilaterally overturn consensus at such a discussion by simply ignoring it and repeatedly re-creating the deleted page is unacceptable. Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by individual editors ignoring what everybody else thinks and continually trying to force their view through. You have now created the page at least five times, under at least three titles, using at least two accounts. You are welcome to contribute to the encyclopaedia, but please do not continue your attempts to use Wikipedia to publicise Krishna Ballesh. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have looked at the history of this talk page, and was concerned to see the number of messages you have received about various problems with your editing. I started composing a message to you, with suggestions on how to avoid further problems. In the course of preparing to do so, however, I discovered various further problems, including the fact that you had chosen to ignore not only repeated warnings on this page about conflict of interest, but also a discussion on that subject at the conflict of interest noticeboard. (You have made 97 edits to S. Ballesh your first warning about conflict of interest, and 47 since you were informed of the discussion at the conflict of interest noticeboard discussion.) I also see that concern over your use of multiple accounts was mentioned in that discussion. I then discovered that while I was preparing a message warning you about my concerns, you used yet another account to yet again re-create the article that I warned you about above. The combination of all the problems with your editing, combined with the evident fact that you have no intention of taking notice of warnings about those problems, has led me to block this account indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shiva2586 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi JamesBWatson Sir, Shiva Shankar here, am advocate personally my age 47 and also learning shehnai from tansen academy of music chennai from my master Shri Krishna Ballesh and guruji legendery Shri Pandit. S. Ballesh, they are indian classical hindustani musicians and shehnai players, who also play shehnai for film recordings for maestro illayaraja and oscar winner ar. rahman, JamesBWatson am disciple of Krishna Ballesh sir not only me nearly 300 students are unser Krishna Ballesh sir learning music and nearly 60 members are learning shehnai only. so we are creating the article on our guruji's that is our masters because am student of Krishna Ballesh sir, i have been blocked for my contribution. am dedicated musicians of shehnai i dont know the reason that why i have been blocking always. come to an discussion with me, lets discuss and i wanna a clear all your doubts from my side, that am not abusing wikipedia rules or am not creating any offence by contributing. some articles am editing or contributing for wikipedia, they dont have any information because they are great legends of music in india, who are musicians of india history. for some article which am creating is very tough job to find source in online but they are real musicians like pandit Jagannath Mishra shehnai player, ustad nayyar hussain shehnai player and ustad nazim hussian great tabla player and ustad mumtaz hussain great shehnai player and shri krishna ballesh disciple of ustad bismillah khan. all are shehnai players of india and disciples of ustad bismillah khan the shehnai is rare instrument, so we students of academy contributing on them. but we are not getting any help from wikipedia for furthur talks, because they are stopping my work not helping me to create or not allowing me to edit or not permitting me time limit for my work, hope you understand how tough to contribute to wikipedia, but your block and by your attack on us de-movitates us feel waste of my personal time, feel rubbish my way. being a advocate and musician think of it their is no reason for blocking my user id and my IP Address too. please unblock me and if u feel am good please allow me to go furthur i feel i should contribute to wikipedia then please release my account and unblock me. take it as my personal request. thanking you sir.Shiva2586 (talk) 8:50 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shiva2586 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Yunshui, please help me on this,ya sure, i got understood and y am blocked, from no i will work for wikipedia and i will not create any unwanted damage to wikipedia. from now i will try to be a good editor and will contribute for you. please unblock my account and unblock my IP Address Shiva2586 (talk) 10:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No clear explanation of understanding of block reasons and what behaviors will change, and the apparent issues with multiple accounts. only (talk) 15:28, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am afraid that you will need to provide more information before an administrator will be willing to unblock you. You will need to show that you understand why you are blocked, by explaining the reason in your own words. You will also need to explain what you intend to write about if you are unblocked - this will need to be more specific that "I will make good contributions." Before you can be unblocked, we need to be sure that you understand what you did wrong, and that you won't do it again - unfortunately, simply saying, "I understand what I did wrong and I won't do it again," without any further explanation is not very convincing. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:26, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a case of WP:COMPETENCE, as in English language competence. The first unblock request is barely comprehensible. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:27, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that any reviewing admin should also look at User talk:Krishnaballesh. Peridon (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Shiva2586 (talk · contribs), Krishnaballesh (talk · contribs) and Brubksptr (talk · contribs) are Technically indistinguishable. —DoRD (talk) 14:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shiva2586 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, encourage me for being with wikipedia, am a good advocate personally, but love to work for wikipedia as an editor and am a good lover and good learner of music wannacontribute for wiki. but am just started learning how to work but after block i came to know how to work and what to contribute and what sources should be added for the work. so now please help me request you please unblock me. thank you. waiting for your kind reply.. Shiva2586 (talk) 18:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I just declined one of your other accounts too. A block applies to a person across the entire project D P 18:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.