User talk:Shiroisnowflake

Welcome!

Hello, Shiroisnowflake, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Line Madder, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Largoplazo (talk) 23:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Line Madder

The article The Line Madder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book published through an on-demand publisher. The synopsis is a copy-paste from elsewhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 23:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: The Line Madder

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The Line Madder, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.justfiction-edition.com/catalog/details/store/pt/book/978-620-2-48918-8/the-line-madder?search=madder, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Line Madder and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, The Line Madder, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Line Madder. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:The Line Madder with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:The Line Madder saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Largoplazo (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Line Madder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Line Madder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Line Madder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 23:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies about The Line Madder

I must apologize for having posted this article over at the talk page for ACTRIAL, as It seems that dozens of editors have pounced on it as a result. A trial has just been instigated that prevents non-autoconfirmed users (less than 10 edits and less than 4 days since account creation) from creating new articles. You started writing your article before ACTRIAL went live, but submitted it afterwards. As a result I asked about this oddity over at the project page, which several hundred editors are watching, and it seems that it has brought down a lot of scrutiny by a number of them onto your article. Sorry! — InsertCleverPhraseHere ^{(or here)} 00:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shiroisnowflake (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for a) having a promotion only page, and b) sockpuppeting. I have done none of these things. Though it is believed by the blocker that I have only made the page The Line Madder, I actually made minor edits to pages with names and references to mythology. That was not promotion. That was adding to the page in a way that the pages were intended for. Secondly, the reasons I am aware of that I was pegged for sockpuppetry are as follows. I have a similar name to another user (the offending matter is that the names included shiroi and kuroi, black and white. This is coincidental.) and there are other accounts that used the same IP to edit the page (and that IP belongs to a public computer). I am guilty of none of the offenses for which I have been banned from editing, and I would appreciate if I could be unblocked. I understand that many users are displeased with the page I created, but simply disliking a user and pulling invalid reasons out of a hat are not acceptable grounds for blocking someone. I have no more intentions of creating pages. I only want to edit current ones to make them better. However, I cannot do that due to this one user's bias. As well, I was not given even a single warning, though I've known of users in the past to get multiple for far worse offenses than mine. Thank you for your time. I hope you consider my request for unblocking so I may be able to contribute positively to Wikipedia.Shiroisnowflake (talk) 20:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I took a look at your "minor edits": The Line Madder and The Line Madder. All your edits, excepting three to a project talk page, were related to promoting that book, and you clearly collaborate with the author in doing so. And you're telling us it's entirely a coincidence that all the people who argued that article should be kept, new editors with no other interests but this book, came from the same IP address? Sorry, I don't believe that. Huon (talk) 23:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was the blocking admin at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Shiroisnowflake. I think it was the easiest duck case I have ever come across. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The sockpuppetry has now been technically confirmed. Even if this were a public computer, any coincidence can be ruled out. User has admitted to making an offense. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]