User talk:Shikari 123

Nice name. Enter Shikari is my favorite band ever! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfett831 (talk • contribs) 05:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shikari 123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shikari 123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Zone (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:26, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Enter Shikari has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please do not copy the same wording as a copyrighted source such as the BBC. You copied and pasted wording from this page: http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/329f95db-f02e-40bf-a5f7-0dea11529ce3 Binksternet (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? I have never seen that webpage in my entire life... And if you'd actually checked the page you linked to, you'd realise that the Enter Shikari biography on the page is actually copied and pasted from Wikipedia... I am being wrongly accused of copyright infringement; please tell me where you're getting this incorrect information about me from. Shikari 123 (talk) 16:48, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, you are correct. The BBC clearly copied Wikipedia word-for-word.

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memoirs of a Madman (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diary of a Madman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 26 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the Eagles (band) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the Bat Out of Hell: Live with the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the 3 Bats Live page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eagles Reference Removal

I see you have been here for just a very short time, with a little over 300 edits. By making the disputed edit, you are not improving the article. In fact, you are making it worse. And by continuing to make the bad edit, you are entering the realm of edit warring. Please refrain from removing referenced material and breaking citations from the article, but please feel free to add referenced content to improve it. Cheers. Doc talk 23:39, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus is to just have "Rock" displayed in the infobox, and rock only. If you want any more genres added, discuss on the talk page. I am not in the wrong, I am simply reverting edits back to the agreed revision. And those cite errors are not my fault. An editor ignores the consensus by adding genres attached to sources. These sources leave error warnings when they are reverted. It is not my problem to sort out. If the editor hadn't ignored the consensus in the first place, there wouldn't be any errors to resolve! I don't know how I can make that any clearer. Shikari 123 (talk) 00:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not care about genres at all. I care about cite errors. You seem intelligent enough to figure out how to remove what you think is inappropriate without causing cite errors. So you are responsible for edits that create cite errors, no matter who made the prior edit, for whatever reason. If there were no cite errors before, and your edit caused them, it's on you. We want articles without cite errors, and if you caused them you must clean them up. Cheers :) Doc talk 07:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But it's a blatant chain of events, caused by the editor who refused to obey the consensus. Shikari 123 (talk) 20:39, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFC you may be interested in

Previously, you participated in an informal discussion at Talk:Eagles (band) regarding genres in the infobox. Due to a recent dispute, a formal RFC has been opened on the matter. Please feel free to comment as you see fit. --Jayron32 23:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating this helpful RFC, I've now signed it. Shikari 123 (talk) 23:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the interest of keeping the peace, can you undo your recent reversion of our genre-warrior friend? The RFC is done in lieu of edit-warring, and it would be best to avoid editing the article while the RFC is still an open question. When you change the article to favor your own vote in an RFC while the RFC is active, it really doesn't look good. Let the article be for a few days. Please, just undo yourself and let it alone; when the RFC is complete then we can implement the change. And it will then carry the force of consensus, and make it unassailable. Right now it just looks like more edit warring, and we don't want that. --Jayron32 00:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, done Shikari 123 (talk) 00:23, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A gift

[1] Martinevans123 (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What a fantastic video, thanks for sharing! Shikari 123 (talk) 23:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Golden Oldies (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

by the current line-up as of 2012: [[Thijs van Leer]], [[Pierre van der Linden]], Menno Gootjes]], and [[Bobby Jacobs]].<ref>http://www.cherryred.co.uk/shopexd.asp?id=4574</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genre General

		The Music Barnstar
		Shikari 123 is hereby awarded the Barnstar of Music for proven diligence in fighting genre warriors on many song, album and artist articles, especially by working with sources to correct or strengthen genre references. Binksternet (talk) 23:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Whereabouts

The article The Whereabouts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, self-sourced, PR device

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bogger (talk) 07:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TwentyThirtyThree

The article TwentyThirtyThree has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bogger (talk) 07:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ayreon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Anthony Lucassen]]. Ayreon's music is described as [[progressive metal]] and [progressive rock]]<ref>{{cite web |author=Huey, Steve |title=Ayreon biography |url=http://www.allmusic.com/artist/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I Don't Care (EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I Don't Care (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Don't Care (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Euryalus (talk) 12:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TwentyThirtyThree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TwentyThirtyThree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TwentyThirtyThree until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Euryalus (talk) 11:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I Don't Care - The Whereabouts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Don't Care - The Whereabouts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Klaatu (band). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Radiopathy •talk• 18:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert on Doom metal

You have reverted my edit on Doom Metal. Please read this. It tells you when to use reverts. And since I have started a discussion on the talk page, you are expected to wait for the result of the discussionbefore you apply changes or reverts. -- Zz (talk) 15:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melodic rock

It is used in the prose as a description, on the left hand side of the article you will find genres

Release Date September 30, 2014

Duration43:49

Genre

Pop/Rock

Styles

Adult Alternative Pop/Rock

Pop

There is no melodic rock here, if you find a source for the genre to be included please do if not it should be left out. Murry1975 (talk) 19:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AllMusic's genre sidebar is not a reliable source on Wikipedia. The review clearly mentions melodic rock. Shikari 123 (talk) 20:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It clearly describes it as melodic rock. Could you link the RS discussion on the allmusic side bar cheers. Murry1975 (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources Shikari 123 (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Magentalane

added a link pointing to Vibes

On Air – Live at the BBC Volume 2

added a link pointing to Tomorrow Never Knows (album)

Sir Army Suit

added a link pointing to Bells

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:12, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ref name

You can reduce the code clutter by using ref name function, see this. It is rather simple; instead of repeating the same ref many times, you add name=blah to the first one (so it becomes <ref name=blah>ref text</ref>), and all others can be just <ref name=blah/>. 115.164.53.229 (talk) 13:04, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to use cite template like this. However, if there's two same links on Reference section, you need to use ref name in this case. 183.171.182.189 (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Cheers, and keep up the good work. 183.171.183.117 (talk) 07:46, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Whereabouts.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Whereabouts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Back to Front: Live in London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page O2 Arena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Mindsweep

added a link pointing to Sorry You're Not a Winner

Two Hands, One Mouth: Live in Europe

added a link pointing to Sunday Mail

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

Hello, Shikari 123. The article List of best-selling music artists in the United States is specifically "the list of the top 100 best-selling music artists in the United States only based on certifications of albums by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)." The only source that is usable for this list is RIAA certifications, not sales as the artists put on their own sites. For that reason, I have restored the verifiable version of the article. If you would like to change the focus of this article, please feel free to discuss this at the article's talk page, but please do not restore it to the incorrect version. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:04, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking more closely at your note when you reverted me, I suspect that you may not have realized that your reversion of my edit introduced errors into the article. I did not revert because of your genre changes. I don't care what the genre says, within reason. I reverted because of vandalism prior to your change that messed up the order of the list. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:09, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Queen II may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Badfinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enter Shikari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rat Race. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not add original research to articles as you apparently did to Blur (Blur album). Please cite a reliable source directly related to the topic of the article, which is often found through research of the most reliable sources on the topic. Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm assuming you found the source you cited here by Googling "Blur" and "art rock". Either way, the source is not directly related to the topic of the article, i.e. the album Blur. Dan56 (talk) 03:53, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I see what you mean, this is not how I went about finding the source. I came across it while reading reviews. I've actually never listened to the album. Shikari 123 (talk) 14:57, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Babymetal#Wikipedia.27s_core_content_policy_of_Verifiability

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Babymetal#Wikipedia.27s_core_content_policy_of_Verifiability. Thanks. 77.4.148.157 (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected of sock puppetry

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrwallace05. Thank you.—indopug (talk) 06:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Enter Shikari - Live in the Barrowland.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Enter Shikari - Live in the Barrowland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ES Live at Milton Keynes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ES Live at Milton Keynes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ES Live at Rock City.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ES Live at Rock City.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ES Live in London.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ES Live in London.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]